![]() |
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Reality Analyst
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,498
|
The price of free speech , is, unfortunately, posts like this one .
__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Reality Analyst
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,498
|
Originally Posted by antichrist
Whereas you simply just abuse the privilege !
__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Reality Analyst
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,498
|
Originally Posted by antichrist
No , i think that comes under the category of the freedom to grossly offend .
aha ! now we know your true motive !
__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom Last edited by Axiom : 08-23-2010 at 01:55 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) |
|
Reality Analyst
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,498
|
um...why in this thread though ?, ..obviously there is some deep rooted connection , but thought it as a sequitur to the bbc piece in the media thread - or more relevant to the fall of the republic thread .
I know all about pissed of americans , .. at least the ones that value freedom and the america that was once the freest and best free range serf farm the world has ever seen !
__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom Last edited by Axiom : 08-25-2010 at 03:05 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) |
|
Reality Analyst
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,498
|
Originally Posted by Axiom
But now -
None Dare Call It Tyranny Sheldon Richman Campaign For Liberty Aug 24, 2010 If you want to know what tyranny is like, look around. The national government — specifically the executive branch — can do pretty much what it wants. It could bomb Iran tomorrow without a declaration of war from Congress. It can — and does — conduct secret wars and covert operations against countries that have done nothing to us. Of course, they are secret only to the ignorant taxpayers who must finance them and perhaps suffer when the provoked retaliation occurs. It can have men behind PlayStation consoles in Nevada fire Hellfire missiles from aerial drones on people in Pakistan, Yemen, and elsewhere. This tyrannical government can send any foreigner picked up anywhere in the world to third countries known for torturing prisoners. It can hold people accused of nothing indefinitely in prisons in Cuba and Afghanistan and torture them into making false confessions. It can conduct a war crimes trial in a military kangaroo court for a man, Omar Khadr, held captive for eight years after he was picked up at the age of 15 during a U.S. assault on villagers near Kabul. His torture-induced “confessions” will be admissible. All this is in violation of commitments under the Optional Protocol on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict not to treat children in war as though they were adults. It can assassinate even American citizens abroad without a scent of due process. It is a government that can write its own warrants without judicial review — and call them national security letters — in order to conduct fishing expeditions in anyone’s electronic records. But that isn’t enough power for the present Progressive administration, which wants the freedom to examine our browser histories and email correspondents’ names. The Bill of Rights, like the Geneva Convention, has become “quaint” and obsolete. Like any self-respecting tyranny, it tries to keep the truth from its subjects. Comforting words camouflage the 50,000 armed and combat-ready troops that will remain in Iraq after “withdrawal.” Their “primary” mission is to train an army whose own general says won’t be ready for years. This gross deception follows on the heralded “surge,” which supposedly turned things around in Iraq. What “worked,” however, was not U.S. military prowess or Gen. David Petraeus’s brilliance, but the spreading of American taxpayers’ cash to buy off Sunni insurgents and the denouement of ethnic cleansing in Baghdad. And, again, like any self-respecting tyranny, it bridles at leaks of classified documents that tell the people the truth. Solemn administration officials condemn Wikileaks and its sources for supposedly jeopardizing U.S. troops and Afghan collaborators, while adding that nothing new had been revealed. With no sense of irony, the same officials find blood on the hands of Wikileaks’ Julian Assange, ignoring the rivers of blood their policies and weapons have produced in the Middle East and South Central Asia. Without those policies, there would be nothing to leak. Some call for the assassination of Assange, and for all we know he is on President Obama’s kill list. Meanwhile a courageous young soldier, Bradley Manning, who apparently leaked video of American troops committing cold-blooded murder in Baghdad, faces 52 years in prison. Now we are being softened up for the next war, against Iran. As in 2002 with Iraq’s phantom WMDs, the empire advance men tell us Iran is building nuclear weapons, and Obama and Secretary of State Clinton say “all options are on the table,” which phrase includes hydrogen bombs. Once again a Big Lie is repeated without proof. The reason is simple: all evidence runs the other way. The government’s own intelligence agencies say Iran has no nuclear-weapons program, and the International Atomic Energy Agency is on the scene. But no matter. If it suits the tyrannical administration or its partner in empire, Israel, bombs of some kind will fall. The consequences all around will be horrible. Can it really be tyranny if we get to vote? Yes. Thomas Jefferson warned of “elective despotism.” How valuable is your one vote when the government manipulates and distorts the flow of information, when Congress capitulates, and when the “adversarial” mainstream media act like government press agents, if not adoring lapdogs. The ugly truth is out there, but you have to want to know it.
__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Byron Bay, NSW
Posts: 2,548
|
about Iran building nuke weapons I would half expect it to put up scaffolding around all its nuke plants with thousands of kids and mothers camping there, so Israel wants to consider striking it would have to kill thousands of woman and kids. The killing part they would not mind but they may have second thoughts about the bad publicity - but can't ssecond guess Israel nor underestimate their stupidity for making shocking decisions and mistakes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) |
|
Reality Analyst
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,498
|
Freemasons Barter for Power in Australia
August 25, 2010 ![]() The attached photo appeared in The Australian newspaper online today in the following link: It shows Labor Party MP and Treasurer Wayne Swan and Independent MP Bob Katter exchanging Masonic handshakes in the presence of ex-Satanic lodge head , Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard. Since the recent election ended in a draw, six independent and Green MPs hold the balance of power. This handshake from Bob Katter (on the right with white hair) is a Masonic handshake. It is described in the following link as a "Shibboleth" handshake, although it does not precisely resemble the sketch displayed: Secret Masonic Handshakes, Passwords, Signs and Grips for the Entered Apprentice, Fellow Craft and Master Mason Degrees of Blue Lodge Freemasonry ![]() Notice the following: Both MPs are looking at their Masonic handshake and not at each other Wayne Swan is wearing a triangular cuff-link which shows affinity to the New World Order. Who wears triangular cuff-links??? You do realize, don't you, that opposition to the NWO is really starting to come together with great momentum. You guys there at Rense are bringing down the house. It's absolutely fantastic! Tony Blair & the Pope engage in Masonic handshake.
__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Byron Bay, NSW
Posts: 2,548
|
Ax, you fool. Katter is a Lebanese Maronite Catholic - one of my mob.
And yesterday he warned of having to knock sense into his electorate if necessary - warning he may see the same necessity in you and give you a mighty big thumping |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
|
Reality Analyst
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,498
|
Well , that's a relief , i was really worried there for a moment .
__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom Last edited by Axiom : 08-29-2010 at 10:51 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) |
|
Reality Analyst
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,498
|
Important Media Case Study
by Axiom (from media thread) There are those that say media is all about what sells . They say they love a salacious scandal as it sells copy , like politicians,sportspeople or celebrities misbehaving . Often the more salacious and the bigger the profile of the person , the bigger the story , the greater the sales/profits . True ? If so , then why wont the msm touch the larry sinclair story with a bargepole ? Is it because they have proved beyond question that larry sinclair is just a publicity seeking nutter ? (hasn't stopped them before !) If so why not a story in that ? I have heard larry speak online in radio interviews and he sounds very credible to me . He has written a book , and is regularly appearing in courts of law over his claims . None of this is news worthy ?? Extraordinary isn't it ? Could it be they don't want to embarrass the president ? Didn't stop them with bill clinton . Is it because this sheds far too much light on the class of criminal puppets that pose to represent us , so their media lackeys are told not to touch this story ? Is this the sword of Damocles or asset control mechanism used to control puppet obama ? This is a highly revealing and illustrative case for reality analysts .
__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|