Iconoclast

Dude, I Rsphkd your vaccine Hg poisoning panic. I could do the same with F or the naphthal silliness.

Ax, I love you dearly, but, you are in a paranoia fugue. You need to learn to trust the people who have BOTH, knowledge and ethics.

__________________
The individual is hopeless without the group.
The group is hopeless without its individuals.

Axiom

no panic , just simply informing the uninformed . Which i successfully did in that instance by providing the evidence in the form of scientific research .
You , on the other hand went into a panic of ad hom hyperbole without actually confronting your initial error of unjustifiable guffawing .

yeah right go for it ..
i'm waiting for you .... come on .. you can do it ..



LOL
Now who might that be ?
The government ?
Corporate funded science ?
Corporate/govt funded academic institutions ?
The mainstream media ?
The manipulated mass consensus ?

I suggest you look outside your narrow little box , and start getting informed !


Educate and inform the whole mass of the people… They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty.
Thomas Jefferson

__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom

Iconoclast

Nup. ME!

__________________
The individual is hopeless without the group.
The group is hopeless without its individuals.

antichrist

Ax, do you ever feel youy are the bear that they tie to the village pole and everybody throws peanuts at you?

Axiom

i think you're thinking of the town truth teller !!

__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom

Axiom

"American business schools have all to often become fraud factories."

Manufacture profits with doctored accounting so the CEO can get the maximum bonus.

If you can do that, you'll never be lacking a job in the new corporate America.

But wait, there's more...

How much bigger is today's crisis than the Bush I Savings & Loan Crisis?

As big? Twice as big? Ten times as big?

Try forty times bigger - and the enforcement arm of the SEC is a mere shadow of what it was back then.

The great American fraud factory WATCH FROM THE 13TH MINUTE MARK : PROFESSOR K.BLACK .

Can you say "corruption AND conspiracy" ?

__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom

Axiom

Hannah Arendt Blamed Nazism on Conspiracy Theory

August 21, 2010

Review of Hannah Arendt's "The Origins of Totalitarianism." London:Andre Deutsch,1986.


by Guy Nicholls






Reading this book, I was struck by the many references to "conspiracy theories". I was inspired to learn that conspiracy theories were embraced by my forebears whom Arendt refers to scathingly as "the masses."


According to Arendt, by the late nineteenth century, the conspiracy-manic masses were showing furious interest in the so-called "supra-state powers" i.e. the Jesuits, Jews and Freemasons. A huge trade was done in what Arendt refers to quaintly as "backstairs political literature" on the triple-headed conspiracy that controlled governments, instigated wars and revolutions. The crux of her argument was that the seeds of totalitarianism and the "Holocaust" were laid when the Nazis managed to corner the conspiracy market with their emphasis on the Jews who ran the the whole triple- headed conspiracy.


Arendt signals her intention to debunk conspiracy. She attempts to sell us the idea that the Jewish state bankers lost their place to a new breed of "imperialistically minded businessmen".


"The intra-European Jewish element became an object of universal hatred because of its useless wealth, and of contempt because of its lack of power" (15).


She tries to debunk Disraeli's espousal of Jewish ethno-supremacism as highly eccentric and chimeral.


Firstly, Dizzy's Jewish ethno-supremacism seems less eccentric when set in the context of the phenomenon of British Israelism. As Christopher Jon Bjerknes has documented, this belief in Jewish Choseness had taken firm root among Britain's ruling class for centuries to the point where Victoria and her family saw themselves as King David's descendants.


Many Englishmen like Sir Isaac Newton (1643-1727) subscribed to the Cabalistic prophecies in the Zohar about Jewish Choseness for world rule. Disraeli was no anachronism in this respect. The ground for such beliefs had been previously laid among the English themselves in publications over centuries.


Secondly, if the power of the secret societies Disraeli warned about is so "chimerical," then what does Arendt make of the fact that totalitarians like Hitler modeled their movements and governments on the successes of these same (largely Jewish) secret societies?


In apparent self contradiction, Arendt clearly evokes the arrogance and God-like powers imperialists and totalitarians tend to evince. It seems that Baring and Rhodes shared the same appetite for secret power and expansion for its own sake that came to characterize the totalitarian dictators. So vivid is the picture Arendt etches of the power to which actors like Rhodes aspired that it seems to contradict her original argument re-the power of such societies being merely "chimerical". Indeed it is here that the up-to-now vague sceptre of the NWO heaves more clearly into focus.


PERSONAL DIMENSION


For Arendt the "Jewish Question" revolved around the personal trauma she suffered with the Nazi take-over in 1933. Nothing in her assimilated, liberal and socialist background steeped in Enlightenment values and principles prepared her for what then followed.


None of this had come about by accident. These WW1 outcomes were all the ones desired by those who had orchestrated the conflict.


It had all begun with the "permanent revolution" and perpetual war tactic initiated not so much by Trotsky as by another Rothschild agent called Parvus a.k.a. Alexander Helphand.


Parvus helped finance and orchestrate the Donmeh Crypto-Jewish seizure of state power in Turkey in 1908. The genocide against the Armenian Christians that followed in 1915 ensured their key positions in the army and bureaucratic elite were filled by Donmeh. Ataturk himself was one.


The Nazi leadership right up to Hitler himself were also of the Crypto-Jewish variety and backed by the same Jewish bankers. It was these Sabbatean Jews who would unleash the genocide known today as the "Holocaust." Rationalized as the fulfillment of OT prophecies re-the need for Jewish atonement for past sins this genocide targetted Orthodox Ostjuden and assimilated Jews who had no interest in going to Palestine as its prime victims.


Naturally the Sabbatean apostasy and the schism it wrought within Judaism from the seventeenth century on remain taboo in Arendt's Holocaust narrative. Given that one of her great friends was Zionist religious historian Gershon Scholem who was the first to give due weight to Sabbateanism within Jewish history, one wonders how she could have remained unaware of it.


Ironically when Arendt comes to write about the Jewish role in her book, "Eichmann In Jerusalem," she seems not to have noticed that Adolf Eichmann had Zionist contacts in Palestine, had visited in 1937, and spoke Yiddish and Hebrew was himself a full Jew! In Origins no mention is made of these Nazi-Zionist contacts that led to the Transfer Agreement of 1936 that Edwin Black had laid the basis for the economic infrastructure of the nascent Israeli state.


Again, since Arendt came to settle in New York, one wonders how she failed to notice it was home to the CFR not to mention the UN where Sabbatean Jews and Zionists had established bases of international reach and power.


Though Arendt makes no real attempt to trace what she calls the totalitarian "virus" to its real source among the Cabalist bankers and NWO globalists with whom conspiracy researchers are familiar, her description of totalitarianism in power (389-459) leaves the abiding impression that Hitler and Stalin were indeed both merely front-men for these manipulative elites.


For Arendt, the masses cannot understand that the "fortuitousness" that pervades reality is the real driving force of history (352). In the final analysis, this familiar "cock-up theory" of history puts her at odds with conspiracy theorists who view history as the product of elite manipulation.


Yet before we discard Arendt as just another establishment historian, there are enough clues in Origins to suggest that the Twentieth Century was but a dress rehearsal for the NWO. Indeed Arendt does leave us with one final insight:


Were it not for the fact as she notes that education has not been the means to instill convictions in us but rather to destroy our capacity to form any, we might by now have noticed that the left/right paradigm for political action is now utterly redundant (468,442).


"The politically most important yardstick for judging events in our time is...whether they serve totalitarian domination or not" (442).


This call to eternal vigilance is one with which conspiracy researchers today will likely readily concur.



Bibliography



http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/SAID-chap5.pdf


http://www.jewishracism.com/Jewish_G...e_Enlarged.pdf

__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom

Axiom

Watch This Bizarre Interview, Where Swedish Prosecutors Claim Rape Charge Against Wikileaks Founder Was Normal Procedure

__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom

Iconoclast

The wikileaks dude has been immunised by this contrived dirty trick. Now every time an organisation tries to nail him, it will look like a stitch-up. Good luck to him. He fights the good fight.

__________________
The individual is hopeless without the group.
The group is hopeless without its individuals.

Axiom

if he is totally legit ,he should stay away from the scottish highlands , ski slopes and light plane travel .

__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom

antichrist

and he should stay away from conspiracy theorist coz they will stuff his mind right up

Axiom

might have saved their life !!!

__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom

Axiom

Albert Einstein: Plagiarist and Fraud

by Ian Mosley



Albert Einstein is today revered as “the Father of Modern Science”. His wrinkled face and wild hair has become a symbol for scientific genius and “his” famous E = mc^2 equation is repeatedly used as the symbol for something scientific and intellectual. And yet there has for years been mounting evidence that this “Father of Modern Science” was nothing but a con man, lying about his ideas and achievements, and stealing the work and the research of others.

The most glaring evidence against Einstein concerns “his” most famous equation. One website notes “The equation E=mc^2, which has been forever linked to Einstein & his Theory of Relativity was not originally published by Einstein. According to Umberto Bartocci, a professor at the University of Perugia and a historian of mathematics, this famous equation was first published by Olinto De Pretto …two years prior to Einstein’s publishing of the equation. In 1903 De Pretto published his equation in the scientific magazine Atte and in 1904 it was republished by the Royal Science Institute of Veneto. Einstein’s research was not published until 1905… Einstein was well versed in Italian and even lived in Northern Italy for a brief time.”

It is unheard of to pass over the original inventor of an equation and to give credit to someone, who claims to have derived it AFTER the equation and its derivation have been published. The equation “E=mc^2″ should be called the “De Pretto Equation” not the “Einstein Equation.”

This raises the question: “What sort of man was Einstein?” Is there evidence that he may have been prone to unethical behavior? One website reports “Einstein… was still far from the ideal husband. A year before they married, Maric gave birth to a daughter, Lieserl, while Einstein was away. The child’s fate is unknown – she is presumed to have been given up for adoption, perhaps under pressure from Einstein, who is thought to have never seen his first born. After the marriage, Mileva bore two sons but the family was not to stay together. Einstein began an affair with his cousin Elsa Lowenthal while on a trip to Berlin in 1912, leaving Mileva and his family two years later. Einstein and Mileva finally divorced in 1919, but not until after Einstein sent his wife a list of ‘conditions’ under which he was willing to remain married. The list included such autocratic demands as ‘You are neither to expect intimacy nor to reproach me in any way’. After the divorce, he saw little of his sons. The elder, Hans Albert, later reflected ‘Probably the only project he ever gave up on was me.’ The younger, Eduard, was diagnosed with schizophrenia and died in an asylum. Einstein married Elsa soon after the divorce, but a few years later began an affair with Betty Neumann, the niece of a friend… Accusations of plagiarism aren’t limited to Mileva – it’s also been claimed that Einstein stole the work of a host of other physicists. One question which may remain moot is quite how much Einstein drew from the work of Hendrik Lorentz and Henri Poincare in formulating the theory of special relativity. Elements of Einstein’s 1905 paper paralleled parts of a 1904 paper by Lorentz and a contemporary paper by Poincare. Although Einstein read earlier papers by the two, he claimed not to have seen these later works before writing the 1905 paper. One apparently damning fact is that the 1905 paper on special relativity had no references, suggesting that Einstein was consciously hiding his tracks.”

One source notes “David Hilbert submitted an article containing the correct field equations for general relativity five days before Einstein.” Another source notes “Einstein presented his paper on November 25, 1915 in Berlin and Hilbert had presented his paper on November 20 in Göttingen. On November 18, Hilbert received a letter from Einstein thanking him for sending him a draft of the treatise Hilbert was to deliver on the 20th. So, in fact, Hilbert had sent a copy of his work at least two weeks in advance to Einstein before either of the two men delivered their lectures, but Einstein did not send Hilbert an advance copy of his.” Apparently Hilbert’s work was soon to become “Einstein’s work.”

The historic record is readily available and the truth is known to many scientists and historians, even if they are afraid to say anything. The idea that light had a finite speed was proven by Michelson and Morley decades before Einstein. Hendrik Lorentz determined the equations showing relativistic time and length contractions which become significant as the speed of light is approached. These gentlemen along with David Hilbert and Olinto De Pretto have been airbrushed out of the picture so that Einstein could be given the credit for what they had done.

Einstein appeared to latch onto his first wife, a much more talented student three years his senior, to compensate for his own limited abilities. Another website notes: “…in 1927, H. Thirring wrote, ‘H. Poincare had already completely solved the problem of time several years before the appearance of Einstein’s first work (1905). . . .’ Sir Edmund Whittaker in his detailed survey, A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity, Volume II, (1953), included a chapter entitled ‘The Relativity Theory of Poincare and Lorentz’. Whittaker thoroughly documented the development of the theory, documenting the authentic history, and demonstrated through reference to primary sources that Einstein held no priority for the vast majority of the theory. Einstein offered no counter-argument to Whittaker’s famous book. . .”

Einstein was a minor contributor at best and in any case an intellectual thief and pretentious braggart. Einstein was still alive when Whitaker’s book was published and he said NOTHING about it. No libel suit, no refutation, no public comment at all.

Einstein was the first great fraudster and idea-thief in modern science. His theft of Olinto De Pretto’s equation E = mc^2 gave him considerable scientific credibility which he built a career on. De Pretto was not a career physicist and spent his life as an industrialist, passing away in 1921. De Pretto had published his equation twice before Einstein and was no doubt amazed that someone could claim credit for his work. Einstein used and eventually discarded his first wife, Mileva, who was a much more brilliant student than Einstein and is suspected of writing much of Einstein’s early work. (She may have been reluctant to expose Einstein since he was still the father of her children.) David Hilbert’s work on the equations for Special Relativity was submitted for publication before Einstein and was sent to Einstein as correspondence. Einstein claimed credit for the equations which Hilbert derived. (David Hilbert passed away in 1943.)

Some university professors have stolen work from their graduate students and it would be interesting to see if any of Einstein’s students complained of such thievery. A plagiarist seldom stops plagiarizing especially when he keeps getting away with it. Complaints against Einstein however seem to disappear down the Orwellian memory hole. Einstein is clearly a sacred cow to many. A few have even used the word “heresy” to describe serious well-documented criticism and charges of plagiarism against Einstein. The truth eventually wins out and Einstein will someday be best known as a great fraud instead of a great physicist.

__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom

antichrist

As wekk Ax, I have it on reasonably authority that the Devil actually wrote the Bible

Axiom

Gareth WIllams: Riddle of murder spy's money trail | Mail Online

__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom