Go Back   OzChess - Australia's Chess Forum > Discussions Not Related to Chess (Non-Chess) > Non-Chess Related Discussion
Connect with Facebook

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 10-29-2011, 02:52 AM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
antichrist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Byron Bay, NSW
Posts: 2,821
Default Dont Call Me Fat

Study Shows Why It’s Hard to Keep Weight Off
By GINA KOLATA
Published: October 26, 2011


For years, studies of obesity have found that soon after fat people lost weight, their metabolism slowed and they experienced hormonal changes that increased their appetites. Scientists hypothesized that these biological changes could explain why most obese dieters quickly gained back much of what they had so painfully lost.

GETTY IMAGES
But now a group of Australian researchers have taken those investigations a step further to see if the changes persist over a longer time frame. They recruited healthy people who were either overweight or obese and put them on a highly restricted diet that led them to lose at least 10 percent of their body weight. They then kept them on a diet to maintain that weight loss. A year later, the researchers found that the participants’ metabolism and hormone levels had not returned to the levels before the study started.

The study, being published Thursday in The New England Journal of Medicine, is small and far from perfect, but confirms their convictions about why it is so hard to lose weight and keep it off, say obesity researchers who were not involved the study.

They cautioned that the study had only 50 subjects, and 16 of them quit or did not lose the required 10 percent of body weight. And while the hormones studied have a logical connection with weight gain, the researchers did not show that the hormones were causing the subjects to gain back their weight.

Nonetheless, said Dr. Rudolph Leibel, an obesity researcher at Columbia, while it is no surprise that hormone levels changed shortly after the participants lost weight, “what is impressive is that these changes don’t go away.”

Dr. Stephen Bloom, an obesity researcher at Hammersmith Hospital in London, said the study needed to be repeated under more rigorous conditions, but added, “It is showing something I believe in deeply — it is very hard to lose weight.” And the reason, he said, is that “your hormones work against you.”

In the study, Joseph Proietto and his colleagues at the University of Melbourne recruited people who weighed an average of 209 pounds. At the start of the study, his team measured the participants’ hormone levels and assessed their hunger and appetites after they ate a boiled egg, toast, margarine, orange juice and crackers for breakfast. The dieters then spent 10 weeks on a very low calorie regimen of 500 to 550 calories a day intended to makes them lose 10 percent of their body weight. In fact, their weight loss averaged 14 percent, or 29 pounds. As expected, their hormone levels changed in a way that increased their appetites, and indeed they were hungrier than when they started the study.

They were then given diets intended to maintain their weight loss. A year after the subjects had lost the weight, the researchers repeated their measurements. The subjects were gaining the weight back despite the maintenance diet — on average, gaining back half of what they had lost — and the hormone levels offered a possible explanation.

One hormone, leptin, which tells the brain how much body fat is present, fell by two-thirds immediately after the subjects lost weight. When leptin falls, appetite increases and metabolism slows. A year after the weight loss diet, leptin levels were still one-third lower than they were at the start of the study, and leptin levels increased as subjects regained their weight.

Other hormones that stimulate hunger, in particular ghrelin, whose levels increased, and peptide YY, whose levels decreased, were also changed a year later in a way that made the subjects’ appetites stronger than at the start of the study.

The results show, once again, Dr. Leibel said, that losing weight “is not a neutral event,” and that it is no accident that more than 90 percent of people who lose a lot of weight gain it back. “You are putting your body into a circumstance it will resist,” he said. “You are, in a sense, more metabolically normal when you are at a higher body weight.”

A solution might be to restore hormones to normal levels by giving drugs after dieters lose weight. But it is also possible, said Dr. Jules Hirsch of Rockefeller University, that researchers just do not know enough about obesity to prescribe solutions.

One thing is clear, he said: “A vast effort to persuade the public to change its habits just hasn’t prevented or cured obesity.”

“We need more knowledge,” Dr. Hirsch said. “Condemning the public for their uncontrollable hedonism and the food industry for its inequities just doesn’t seem to be turning the tide.”
antichrist is offline  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2011, 03:23 AM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
The Seeing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 263
Default Answer

M.S.G
The Seeing is offline  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2011, 10:51 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Pablito15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 668
Default

Surely this is a nonsense.

Food has a set amount of content, it is not infinite. You can't make a banana 10 bananas because of your metabolism. And at the end of the day if you eat more than you act you put on weight, and if you act more than you eat you feel hungry, which is essentially the definition of dieting.

It is far healthier to assume responsibility for the actions you take. We're all presented with impulses every day- hunger is not a disease.
__________________
My Blog!
Pablito15 is offline  

Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2011, 11:55 PM   #4 (permalink)
SCTC
 
Jaydon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Queensland, Gold Coast
Posts: 1,101
ICC Handle: Aussieboy007
FICS Handle: Bermusia
Default

Originally Posted by Pablito15 View Post
Surely this is a nonsense.

Food has a set amount of content, it is not infinite. You can't make a banana 10 bananas because of your metabolism. And at the end of the day if you eat more than you act you put on weight, and if you act more than you eat you feel hungry, which is essentially the definition of dieting.

It is far healthier to assume responsibility for the actions you take. We're all presented with impulses every day- hunger is not a disease.
Oh yeah I see what you're sayi.. wait what?
Jaydon is offline  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2011, 12:05 AM   #5 (permalink)
SCTC
 
Jaydon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Queensland, Gold Coast
Posts: 1,101
ICC Handle: Aussieboy007
FICS Handle: Bermusia
Default

Originally Posted by antichrist View Post
The dieters then spent 10 weeks on a very low calorie regimen of 500 to 550 calories a day intended to makes them lose 10 percent of their body weight.
Also, stopped reading there
Jaydon is offline  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2011, 12:02 AM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
antichrist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Byron Bay, NSW
Posts: 2,821
Default

Originally Posted by Pablito15 View Post
Surely this is a nonsense.

Food has a set amount of content, it is not infinite. You can't make a banana 10 bananas because of your metabolism. And at the end of the day if you eat more than you act you put on weight, and if you act more than you eat you feel hungry, which is essentially the definition of dieting.

It is far healthier to assume responsibility for the actions you take. We're all presented with impulses every day- hunger is not a disease.
well where I grew up when they wanted to fatten cattle up for market they would first starve them, then feed them like pigs and they ate like pigs and put on tonnes, and got a top price at auctions they were just up from my place. Mr Gaukroger was the auctioneer on a friday afternoon.

I remember that much
antichrist is offline  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Go Back   OzChess - Australia's Chess Forum > Discussions Not Related to Chess (Non-Chess) > Non-Chess Related Discussion


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:



All times are GMT +11. The time now is 03:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Copyright © 2000-2010 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

The views and opinions expressed in posts on this site are exclusively those of the member who made them, and do not represent the views or opinions of OzChess or OzChess's owners. OzChess does not endorse any post, and makes no representations about the truth or accuracy of any matter contained in any post made by members of this site.