Admin

[Today 07:41 PM] antichrist: just to say off surfing with usually including a quip about the board after having gone fru the threads
[Today 07:31 PM] Kevin Bonham: come on AC, you post and shout about yourself all the time (except when banned)
[Today 07:28 PM] antichrist: the limit should be 5 and non about oneself
[Today 07:24 PM] Kevin Bonham: and if people now and then make 11 or 12 or a row or once in a blue moon make 20 we don't care - it is a guideline
[Today 07:24 PM] Kevin Bonham: there are exceptions, for instance when answering questions asked by other shouters
[Today 07:24 PM] Kevin Bonham: there isn't a limit of 15, rather, posters are generally supposed to make not more than 10 consecutive non-chess posts unanswered
[Today 07:16 PM] antichrist: he already makes it a joke
[Today 07:15 PM] antichrist: if other people did as well the sb would be the biggest pile of bulldust immaginable
[Today 07:14 PM] antichrist: largely still often means umpteen posts of self centered monologues that should not be tolerated at all, not even 3, a limit of 15 unanswered is no limit at all
[Today 07:06 PM] Kevin Bonham: he has largely obeyed the restrictions we placed to curb that sort of stuff (monologues) - more than can be said for some
[Today 07:06 PM] Kevin Bonham: it is rare for him to post anything like twenty in a row
[Today 07:05 PM] antichrist: but he is worse, he posts up to twenty, or close to it, or in a row about nothing interesting to anyone else, and in pidgeon yankee, a complete turnoff to any sensible person who chess person are expected to be
[Today 07:03 PM] Kevin Bonham: he is not even our #1 shouter
[Today 06:58 PM] antichrist: just one person hogging the shoutbox mostly uninteresting and unconnected to other posters, just about himself, cannot be any good for the site
[Today 06:57 PM] Kevin Bonham: any number of posters here could have exactly the same effect. sprout may be odd but he is harmless
[Today 06:57 PM] antichrist: but if people got CC whilst in the middle of a sprouty explosion they will soon catch the first train outta dere
[Today 06:56 PM] Kevin Bonham: but when i use straight google.com i get CC fifth and this one sixth
[Today 06:55 PM] Kevin Bonham: in answer to your question J2G, when i use google.com.au i get the same thing - this forum first and CC second
[Today 05:56 PM] Just2Good: http://www.ozchess.com.au/showpost.p...0&postcount=70
[Today 05:56 PM] Just2Good: -
[Today 05:46 PM] Just2Good: So please visit FoxNews.com - Breaking News | Latest News | Current News at least once a day people, to honour Axiom's memory.
[Today 05:45 PM] Just2Good: Just letting everyone know, if Axiom were here - he would want us to be watching Fox News so we could all get informed!
[Today 04:17 PM] antichrist: AC gives a shoutout to Jesus Christ - Hi Jesus, are you still a virgin?
*Just2Good has reached 5250 posts!*
[Today 09:58 AM] antichrist: AC gives a Shoutout to KB, Hi KB

[01-30-2011 06:30 PM] Kevin Bonham: Further Response posted in thread...Admin notice
[01-30-2011 06:29 PM] Kevin Bonham: The Response posted in thread...Admin notice

Jaydon

The above comments are in no way endorsed by the SCT.
Do you hear that j2g? It's the sound of axiom turning in his grave

Ehm TO

LOL. Doesn't Ax like infowars?

__________________
Camel - Welcome to flavour country!

Just2Good

Hopefully it wakes him up so much, he comes back to OzChess.

__________________
.
"The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing."

~ Isaiah Berlin ~

Kevin

[Today 06:55 PM] Kevin : in answer to your question J2G, when i use google.com.au i get the same thing - this forum first and CC second
[Today 06:56 PM] Kevin : but when i use straight google.com i get CC fifth and this one sixth
[Today 06:57 PM] antichrist: but if people got CC whilst in the middle of a sprouty explosion they will soon catch the first train outta dere
[Today 06:57 PM] Kevin : any number of posters here could have exactly the same effect. sprout may be odd but he is harmless
[Today 06:58 PM] antichrist: just one person hogging the shoutbox mostly uninteresting and unconnected to other posters, just about himself, cannot be any good for the site
[Today 07:03 PM] Kevin : he is not even our #1 shouter
[Today 07:05 PM] antichrist: but he is worse, he posts up to twenty, or close to it, or in a row about nothing interesting to anyone else, and in pidgeon yankee, a complete turnoff to any sensible person who chess person are expected to be
[Today 07:06 PM] Kevin : he has largely obeyed the restrictions we placed to curb that sort of stuff (monologues) - more than can be said for some
[Today 07:06 PM] Kevin : it is rare for him to post anything like twenty in a row
[Today 07:14 PM] antichrist: largely still often means umpteen posts of self centered monologues that should not be tolerated at all, not even 3, a limit of 15 unanswered is no limit at all
[Today 07:15 PM] antichrist: if other people did as well the sb would be the biggest pile of bulldust immaginable
[Today 07:16 PM] antichrist: he already makes it a joke
[Today 07:24 PM] Kevin : and if people now and then make 11 or 12 or a row or once in a blue moon make 20 we don't care - it is a guideline
[Today 07:24 PM] Kevin : there are exceptions, for instance when answering questions asked by other shouters
[Today 07:24 PM] Kevin : there isn't a limit of 15, rather, posters are generally supposed to make not more than 10 consecutive non-chess posts unanswered
[Today 07:28 PM] antichrist: the limit should be 5 and non about oneself
[Today 07:31 PM] Kevin : come on AC, you post and shout about yourself all the time (except when banned)
[Today 07:41 PM] antichrist: just to say off surfing with usually including a quip about the board after having gone fru the threads

__________________
I like to make shouts in the OzChess Shoutbox and then reproduce those shouts as posts on the OzChess Forum!

Admin

[Yesterday 09:54 PM] Kevin Bonham: you give me milk instead of cream. say how you want me to [depart]
[Yesterday 09:54 PM] Iconoclast: piss off
[Yesterday 09:54 PM] Kevin Bonham: that's your theme. embroider it!
[Yesterday 09:53 PM] Iconoclast: piss off
[Yesterday 09:53 PM] Kevin Bonham: it would be interesting to know what %age of sweeney's deplorably few shouts on this site have been devoted to abusing me
[Yesterday 09:52 PM] Iconoclast: piss off
[Yesterday 09:52 PM] Kevin Bonham: anyone else want to raise the tone?
[Yesterday 09:51 PM] Iconoclast: piss off
[Yesterday 09:51 PM] Kevin Bonham: yep that confirms it. win by triple repetition for the premier team
[Yesterday 09:51 PM] Iconoclast: piss off
[Yesterday 09:51 PM] Kevin Bonham: oh dear looks like the poor insult-bot is jammed in a defective subroutine
[Yesterday 09:50 PM] Iconoclast: piss off
[Yesterday 09:50 PM] Kevin Bonham: rinse and repeat
[Yesterday 09:50 PM] Iconoclast: piss off
[Yesterday 09:50 PM] Kevin Bonham: practice what you preach sweeney
[Yesterday 09:49 PM] Iconoclast: Shut up. Go Away.
[Yesterday 09:48 PM] Kevin Bonham: you initiated this discussion by talking to me sweeney so do feel free to acquire some perspective
[Yesterday 09:48 PM] Iconoclast: Don't talk to me. You are a creep and I do not want to hear your whining here
[Yesterday 09:48 PM] Kevin Bonham: actually sweeney i want to dispose of excrement posted by others
[Yesterday 09:47 PM] Iconoclast: If you want to chuck shit, go and do it at Chess CHat
[Yesterday 09:46 PM] Kevin Bonham: practice what you preach sweeney
[Yesterday 09:46 PM] Iconoclast: Piss off Bonham
[Yesterday 09:46 PM] Kevin Bonham: for instance at the moment we have 272 guests for the last two hours compared to your 115 (+5 spiders) for the last four and a half hours
[Yesterday 09:45 PM] Kevin Bonham: no alex, your guest viewing numbers are nowhere near ours
[Yesterday 09:21 PM] Keaton Monger: Howdy Just2Good, Kevin Bonham, antichrist, et al.
[Yesterday 08:16 PM] Just2Good: Its about time
[Yesterday 08:16 PM] Just2Good: So you admit our guest viewing numbers are higher than CC's?
[Yesterday 08:12 PM] Kevin Bonham: it does increase the number of people who show up, take a quick look around and then leave
[Yesterday 08:12 PM] Kevin Bonham: actually you should know by now that no matter how many knobs you twiddle it makes relatively little difference to activity here
[Yesterday 07:58 PM] Just2Good: This of course will lead to a large influx of new members and forum activity
[Yesterday 07:48 PM] Just2Good: for those terms
[Yesterday 07:48 PM] Just2Good: 5th and 6th, me too Kevin. And that is a huge improvement for us because recently we were on page 5!
[Yesterday 07:43 PM] antichrist: all those top sb posters should have been limited ages ago

Admin

[Yesterday 10:03 PM] Iconoclast: Pab, I think I will go now
[Yesterday 10:02 PM] Iconoclast: piss off
[Yesterday 10:02 PM] Pablito15: PM him if you need to. It's equally pointless stuff that just cheapens the shoutbox
[Yesterday 10:02 PM] Kevin Bonham: if matthew had any brains he would
[Yesterday 10:01 PM] Iconoclast: piss off
[Yesterday 10:01 PM] Kevin Bonham: telling yourself to PO now?
[Yesterday 10:01 PM] Iconoclast: piss off
[Yesterday 10:00 PM] Kevin Bonham: gee i wonder if this one is going to get copied to a thread. i certainly hope so!
[Yesterday 10:00 PM] Iconoclast: piss off
[Yesterday 10:00 PM] Kevin Bonham: one shout says you're not conversing, the next tells me to PO
[Yesterday 10:00 PM] Iconoclast: piss off
[Yesterday 09:59 PM] Kevin Bonham: matty, feel free to just stop talking to me any time you like
[Yesterday 09:59 PM] Iconoclast: piss off
[Yesterday 09:59 PM] Kevin Bonham: it is because of certain superiorities that i have so many excellent "comebacks"
[Yesterday 09:59 PM] Iconoclast: Pab, if you are still there, please tell Kevy that I am not conversing with him
[Yesterday 09:59 PM] Kevin Bonham: ah no matt, you have it the wrong way round
[Yesterday 09:58 PM] Iconoclast: piss off Kevy
[Yesterday 09:58 PM] Kevin Bonham: and matt so much of your own abuse has that sort of language or more so, it would be a lapse if you omitted it
[Yesterday 09:58 PM] Iconoclast: He thinks that because he has a truck load of lame come-backs that he is morally superior
[Yesterday 09:57 PM] Kevin Bonham: what abusive tone?
[Yesterday 09:57 PM] Iconoclast: I honestly think that the odd "piss off" is not as bad as Bonham's abusive tone
[Yesterday 09:57 PM] Kevin Bonham: i notice the language in question still hasn't been removed
[Yesterday 09:57 PM] Pablito15: Personally, I take the view that any time spent dealing with this inter-forum sniping is sucked so deep into a vacuum that it will never return
[Yesterday 09:56 PM] Pablito15: hehe...
[Yesterday 09:55 PM] Iconoclast: I am just trying to let Kevin know what he is supposed to do.
[Yesterday 09:55 PM] Pablito15: ello there
[Yesterday 09:55 PM] Iconoclast: Hi Pab
[Yesterday 09:54 PM] Pablito15: Hello! This is supposed to be somewhere kids and parents can visit so the language probably just cheapens it.
[Yesterday 09:54 PM] Iconoclast: piss off

Admin

[Today 01:24 AM] Kevin Bonham: we banned him for breaching our rules
[Today 01:24 AM] Grant Szuveges: Hi David, hi Kevin
[Today 01:24 AM] Firegoat7: Grant I was thinking about some stuff with the club championship
[Today 01:23 AM] Firegoat7: and because you banned Moz your argument will always fail
[Today 01:23 AM] Kevin Bonham: more than once as i recall!
[Today 01:23 AM] Firegoat7: Hi Grant
[Today 01:23 AM] Firegoat7: you once banned Moz
[Today 01:22 AM] Firegoat7: this would seem a reasonable argument by you except...
[Today 01:22 AM] Grant Szuveges: And how are we all?
[Today 01:22 AM] Kevin Bonham: once again, it can't be paranoia when it is founded on demonstrated fact
[Today 01:21 AM] Firegoat7: or that you are paranoid
[Today 01:21 AM] Kevin Bonham: actually perhaps they do trust me. but for them to trust me and me not to trust them just shows they are dealing with a more reliable and better behaved person than themselves and they know it
[Today 01:20 AM] Firegoat7: which you use to discuss a site they are banned on
[Today 01:20 AM] Firegoat7: and becoming a member here
[Today 01:20 AM] Firegoat7: by letting you log into their shoutbox
[Today 01:19 AM] Firegoat7: but they demonstrate trust to you
[Today 01:19 AM] Firegoat7: and when pressed on the issue you say you cant post here because you dont trust these people
[Today 01:19 AM] Kevin Bonham: not "instead". those who were banned should have realised they brought it on themselves. instead they continue slagging off the umpire years after the fact
[Today 01:18 AM] Firegoat7: on a site that they are banned from
[Today 01:18 AM] Firegoat7: but instead you complain about a site you have banned and people you have banned
[Today 01:17 AM] Kevin Bonham: they can be just an attempt to set the public record straight or to hold others accountable for poor behaviour
[Today 01:17 AM] Firegoat7: but that is "normal"
[Today 01:17 AM] Firegoat7: well normally complaints are attempts to resolve a greivance of some sort
[Today 01:16 AM] Kevin Bonham: another non sequitur
[Today 01:15 AM] Firegoat7: therefore the logic of you making these CLAIMS is not to resolve anything
[Today 01:15 AM] Kevin Bonham: they have right of reply wherever they like. i do not have effective right of reply in threads here because of arbitrary undocumented editing and arbitrary bannings
[Today 01:15 AM] Firegoat7: so if the CLAIMS have merit they should be discussed in the appropriate way
[Today 01:14 AM] Kevin Bonham: and ditto for bogus puffery about this site supposedly being better than CC in ways it isnt
[Today 01:14 AM] Firegoat7: but they have no right of reply to your CLAIMS
[Today 01:14 AM] Kevin Bonham: if a person makes false personal statements in public they deserve to be called on it in any forum
[Today 01:13 AM] Kevin Bonham: the appropriate place is anywhere and everywhere
[Today 01:13 AM] Firegoat7: it just shows your true character
[Today 01:13 AM] Firegoat7: they allow you onto their site and you dont even have the decency to criticise them in the appropriate place
[Today 01:13 AM] Kevin Bonham: oooh errr, do tell the news of the world all about me being the gravest threat to public decency since topless male bathing
[Today 01:12 AM] Firegoat7: you continue to criticise their site in a place where they cannot respond
[Today 01:12 AM] Firegoat7: that they cannot reply to your criticism of them is because you behave immorally
[Today 01:11 AM] Firegoat7: ok cool
[Today 01:11 AM] Firegoat7: JAK-just put at the end
[Today 01:11 AM] JaK: yeah I read it and replied!
[Today 01:10 AM] Firegoat7: hey Jak in regards to your game
[Today 01:10 AM] Kevin Bonham: they can reply elsewhere. that they cannot reply on CC is their fault
[Today 01:10 AM] Firegoat7: Sweeney cannot reply, nor can Alex or Axiom even
[Today 01:09 AM] JaK: Full pictorial report of MCC Championship's Round One in the thread!
[Today 01:09 AM] Kevin Bonham: and we've been through that before as well
[Today 01:09 AM] Firegoat7: when there is no right of reply over there for the people you post about
[Today 01:09 AM] Kevin Bonham: again perfectly consistent. the link name is not blocked to prevent discussion of this site, but to discourage spamming attacks for this site
[Today 01:08 AM] Firegoat7: and yet you continue to post your objections to the site over there at Chesschat
[Today 01:08 AM] Kevin Bonham: we've been through this one before as well
[Today 01:08 AM] Firegoat7: it was banned before the ******** alex convo
[Today 01:07 AM] Kevin Bonham: hmmm, so i should expect another non sequitur any moment
[Today 01:07 AM] Firegoat7: The name link is banned
[Today 01:07 AM] Firegoat7: its a bit like your chesschat policy with Ozchess as a mod
[Today 01:06 AM] Kevin Bonham: non sequitur
[Today 01:06 AM] Firegoat7: in fact, if you really believed what you claim you wouldn't visit the site at all
[Today 01:06 AM] Kevin Bonham: if anyone disputes the evidence that alex has edited posts without attribution then they are wrong
[Today 01:06 AM] Kevin Bonham: of course i claim and i have been asked to provide evidence before and provided evidence before
[Today 01:05 AM] Firegoat7: but to other observers this doesnt seem to be true
[Today 01:05 AM] Kevin Bonham: don't you ever get bored repeating the same debunked claims after they have been dealt with over and over
[Today 01:05 AM] Firegoat7: so you claim
[Today 01:05 AM] Kevin Bonham: and again i am pointing out that it is not paranoia as it is based on clearly documented facts and patterns of behaviour. again we have been round this block rather too many times
[Today 01:04 AM] Firegoat7: Im just pointing out the obvious paranoia
[Today 01:04 AM] Kevin Bonham: no i don't trust him in the shoutbox, i just consider the consequences of what he might do there to be comparatively trivial
[Today 01:04 AM] Firegoat7: but not enough to post
[Today 01:04 AM] Kevin Bonham: all this has been explained a zillion times, if i get really bored i might release an FAQ
[Today 01:04 AM] Firegoat7: but you trust the site owner enough to interact in the shoutbox
[Today 01:03 AM] Kevin Bonham: yes because there are differences with the shoutbox because conversation in it is more ephemeral than posting
[Today 01:03 AM] Firegoat7: you then say it because of the site owner
[Today 01:03 AM] Firegoat7: you refuse to post under your own name, but you use the shoutbox in your own name
[Today 01:03 AM] Kevin Bonham: the reason for me not currently posting lies partly with alex but mainly with you
[Today 01:02 AM] Kevin Bonham: i refuse to post under my name
[Today 01:02 AM] Firegoat7: almost all this behaviour is irrational
[Today 01:02 AM] Kevin Bonham: i don't refuse to post on this site fullstop
[Today 01:02 AM] Firegoat7: you still post about this site on Chesschat
[Today 01:02 AM] Kevin Bonham: oh i've disposed of that furphy that i "moderate chesschat policy from this site". sometimes i explain CC mod policy on this site, usually in response to questions or false statements
[Today 01:02 AM] Firegoat7: you still refuse to post on this site
[Today 01:01 AM] Kevin Bonham: since what i am doing is reducing the extent to which the site just peddles nonsense
[Today 01:01 AM] Firegoat7: you still continue to moderate chesschat policy from this site
[Today 01:01 AM] Kevin Bonham: nothing inconsistent about that
[Today 01:00 AM] Firegoat7: regardless, you still log onto this site and use its facilities, whilst at the same time preach that it is a "...waste of space"
[Today 12:56 AM] Kevin Bonham: but that usage of rational thought is instrumental
[Today 12:56 AM] Firegoat7: let alone type in a language
[Today 12:56 AM] Firegoat7: you cannot even log in without employing rational thought
[Today 12:56 AM] Kevin Bonham: you wouldn't know - you are not me
[Today 12:55 AM] Firegoat7: its not an assumption its a fact
[Today 12:55 AM] Kevin Bonham: i like to rebut irrationality, but whether a person *desires* to rebut irrationality or not is not a matter of rationality itself, but one of activity preference
[Today 12:54 AM] Kevin Bonham: nah, that assumes that i just do everything according to reasoning and that whether i like to do particular things or not never comes into it
[Today 12:54 AM] Firegoat7: those reasons are irrational
[Today 12:53 AM] Firegoat7: Bonhams reasoning for the relationship are deduced from his own brain
[Today 12:53 AM] Kevin Bonham: well if that relationship was a closer one in the case of several posters here you'd never see me here
[Today 12:53 AM] Firegoat7: Bonham (observer) interacts on Ozchess (empirical fact)
[Today 12:50 AM] Firegoat7: I say that their is a relationship between the individual (observer) and the real world (empirical facts)
[Today 12:49 AM] Kevin Bonham: are you saying people choose their sports teams because they think about what they want in a team they support, then go out and find the team that best embodies that?
[Today 12:49 AM] Kevin Bonham: what i mean is why prefer one team over another
[Today 12:49 AM] Firegoat7: err you
[Today 12:49 AM] Kevin Bonham: taste doesn't even necessarily have anything to do with the properties of the object being favoured
[Today 12:48 AM] Firegoat7: err the football team
[Today 12:48 AM] Kevin Bonham: of course it is. what empirical fact underlines a preference for one football team over another, for example?
[Today 12:47 AM] Firegoat7: its not a generalisation
[Today 12:47 AM] Firegoat7: those reasons you have demonstrated in text
[Today 12:47 AM] Kevin Bonham: "tastes are still based on empirical fact" - massive generalisation there
[Today 12:47 AM] Firegoat7: the question is your reason for having the tastes that you do
[Today 12:46 AM] Kevin Bonham: who is to say either of these activities is "rational" or "irrational"
[Today 12:46 AM] Firegoat7: The question is not what your tastes are
[Today 12:46 AM] Kevin Bonham: some people like to rebut nonsense posted about them on the internet
[Today 12:46 AM] Firegoat7: but tastes are still based on empirical fact
[Today 12:46 AM] Kevin Bonham: some people like to go for walks in parks
[Today 12:46 AM] Kevin Bonham: and liking to do certain things is also like taste
[Today 12:45 AM] Firegoat7: a subjective preference is like taste
[Today 12:45 AM] Kevin Bonham: or a band, or a novel, an artwork, a film ... anything like that
[Today 12:44 AM] Firegoat7: no
[Today 12:44 AM] Kevin Bonham: name me a sport that interests you, if there are any
[Today 12:44 AM] Firegoat7: so you need to back track a bit in the conversation
[Today 12:44 AM] Kevin Bonham: why do you say that?
[Today 12:43 AM] Firegoat7: The idea that a subjective preference cannot be rational or irrational is obviously false
[Today 12:42 AM] Kevin Bonham: but since you maintain my reasons are irrational, what do you even claim that they are?
[Today 12:42 AM] Kevin Bonham: subjective preferences are typically neither rational nor irrational, they are simply what people prefer
[Today 12:41 AM] Kevin Bonham: but the claims of fact i make underlying my reasons for visiting are true
[Today 12:41 AM] Firegoat7: EVERYBODY knows that your reasons are irrational, which has been pointed out time and time again
[Today 12:41 AM] Kevin Bonham: reasons are subjective preferences
[Today 12:40 AM] Kevin Bonham: well it was certainly pointless for you to initiate it again and no doubt you were aware you might be doing so when you started it
[Today 12:40 AM] Firegoat7: but....why do you pretend you have RATIONAL reasons for visiting this forum
[Today 12:39 AM] Firegoat7: obviously it is going to be pretty pointless to have this conversation yet again..
[Today 12:35 AM] Kevin Bonham: firegoat being #3 in the line behind AC and sweeney, the second of whom was unsubtle and unimaginative even by his standards
[Today 12:35 AM] Kevin Bonham: actually i "returned" to reply to something alex had asked for confirmation of and then a string of yahoos wanted to start jumping in and having a go at me
[Today 12:18 AM] Heartbreak Kid: sveshnikov.. meh
[Yesterday 11:59 PM] Firegoat7: ......and HBK dodges another Pelikan challenge
[Yesterday 11:58 PM] Firegoat7: Axiom is sighted at a 7-11 next to Elvis
[Yesterday 11:57 PM] Firegoat7: AC is now reaching new lows in forum cross posting
[Yesterday 11:56 PM] Firegoat7: meanwhile Jaydon has yet to publish his cognitive recognition of the N+B ending
[Yesterday 11:55 PM] Firegoat7: and in more disappointing news Bonbot returns to Ozchess to preach his paranoia

JaK

A very interesting (yet irrelevant) point was made by me at 1.09 please check it out!

Kevin

antichrist: all those top sb posters should have been limited ages ago
Just2Good: 5th and 6th, me too Kevin. And that is a huge improvement for us because recently we were on page 5!
Just2Good: for those terms
Just2Good: This of course will lead to a large influx of new members and forum activity
Kevin Bonham: actually you should know by now that no matter how many knobs you twiddle it makes relatively little difference to activity here
Kevin Bonham: it does increase the number of people who show up, take a quick look around and then leave
Just2Good: Its about time
Just2Good: So you admit our guest viewing numbers are higher than CC's?
Keaton Monger: Howdy Just2Good, Kevin Bonham, antichrist, et al.
Kevin Bonham: no alex, your guest viewing numbers are nowhere near ours
Iconoclast: Piss off Bonham
Kevin Bonham: for instance at the moment we have 272 guests for the last two hours compared to your 115 (+5 spiders) for the last four and a half hours
Kevin Bonham: practice what you preach sweeney
Iconoclast: If you want to chuck shit, go and do it at Chess CHat
Iconoclast: Don't talk to me. You are a creep and I do not want to hear your whining here
Kevin Bonham: actually sweeney i want to dispose of excrement posted by others
Kevin Bonham: you initiated this discussion by talking to me sweeney so do feel free to acquire some perspective
Iconoclast: Shut up. Go Away.
Iconoclast: piss off
Iconoclast: piss off
Kevin Bonham: practice what you preach sweeney
Kevin Bonham: rinse and repeat
Iconoclast: piss off
Iconoclast: piss off
Kevin Bonham: oh dear looks like the poor insult-bot is jammed in a defective subroutine
Kevin Bonham: yep that confirms it. win by triple repetition for the premier team
Iconoclast: piss off
Kevin Bonham: anyone else want to raise the tone?
Iconoclast: piss off
Kevin Bonham: it would be interesting to know what %age of sweeney's deplorably few shouts on this site have been devoted to abusing me
Iconoclast: piss off
Kevin Bonham: that's your theme. embroider it!
Kevin Bonham: you give me milk instead of cream. say how you want me to [depart]
Iconoclast: piss off
Pablito15: Hello! This is supposed to be somewhere kids and parents can visit so the language probably just cheapens it.
Iconoclast: Hi Pab
Iconoclast: I am just trying to let Kevin know what he is supposed to do.
Pablito15: ello there
Pablito15: hehe...
Iconoclast: I honestly think that the odd "piss off" is not as bad as Bonham's abusive tone
Kevin Bonham: i notice the language in question still hasn't been removed
Kevin Bonham: what abusive tone?
Pablito15: Personally, I take the view that any time spent dealing with this inter-forum sniping is sucked so deep into a vacuum that it will never return
Iconoclast: He thinks that because he has a truck load of lame come-backs that he is morally superior
Iconoclast: piss off Kevy
Kevin Bonham: and matt so much of your own abuse has that sort of language or more so, it would be a lapse if you omitted it
Iconoclast: Pab, if you are still there, please tell Kevy that I am not conversing with him
Iconoclast: piss off
Kevin Bonham: ah no matt, you have it the wrong way round
Kevin Bonham: it is because of certain superiorities that i have so many excellent "comebacks"
Kevin Bonham: matty, feel free to just stop talking to me any time you like
Iconoclast: piss off
Iconoclast: piss off
Kevin Bonham: gee i wonder if this one is going to get copied to a thread. i certainly hope so!
Kevin Bonham: one shout says you're not conversing, the next tells me to PO
Iconoclast: piss off
Iconoclast: piss off
Kevin Bonham: telling yourself to PO now?
Iconoclast: piss off
Kevin Bonham: if matthew had any brains he would
Pablito15: PM him if you need to. It's equally pointless stuff that just cheapens the shoutbox
Iconoclast: Pab, I think I will go now

__________________
I like to make shouts in the OzChess Shoutbox and then reproduce those shouts as posts on the OzChess Forum!

Pablito15

I'm on the verge of making a thread titled "inter-forum-knobbery". The purpose of this thread will be to hold all of this sniping, forum number discussion, "he said/she said" stuff etc. far away from the shoutbox where people who actually want to discuss chess or be social can do so.

__________________
My Blog!

Iconoclast

Sometimes I get the urge to engage with Kevin in the same way as FG does. A simple pointing out of his injustices and incongruities. However, I quickly slap myself across the face and scream, No No No! I will not try to convince a sociopath that they should care about people. It is a waste of time.

__________________
The individual is hopeless without the group.
The group is hopeless without its individuals.

antichrist

who is the picture of?

Kevin

I wish for shouts to be reproduced here as posts, so there is a record and its not hurting anyone. If someone doesn't like the shout history, no one is forcing them to read this thread.

__________________
I like to make shouts in the OzChess Shoutbox and then reproduce those shouts as posts on the OzChess Forum!

Igor Goldenberg

Indeed, how dare you to interfere in such an important discussion!!

__________________
For private coaching email IgorGoldenberg@bluebottle.com
Computer tells you what to play, a good coach explains why.

The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.
H. L. Mencken