![]() |
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Immoderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wollongong NSW
Posts: 2,302
|
Harassment: verb: to disturb persistently; torment, as with troubles or cares; bother continually; pester; persecute.
Manners: a. the prevailing customs, ways of living, and habits of a people, class, period, etc.; mores: b. ways of behaving with reference to polite standards; social comportment: Should "bad manners" be illegal? My personal opinion is that sexual harassment is "bad manners." Am I wrong? (Note: I have no pending court cases or axes to grind. This is purely an exercise.)
__________________
The individual is hopeless without the group. The group is hopeless without its individuals. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Reality Analyst
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,498
|
Originally Posted by Iconoclast
Yes.
I think you might find its a touch higher on the totem pole than that , hence the words "sexual" and "harassment" being used and not "sexual" and "bad manners". So it is beyond bad manners and into the realm of harassment . But where is this line drawn ? That's where the lawyers come in . Hope that has helped sort out any confusion.
__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom Last edited by Axiom : 08-13-2010 at 08:50 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
SCTC
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Queensland, Gold Coast
Posts: 1,101
ICC Handle: Aussieboy007
FICS Handle: Bermusia
|
Yeah I'd say sexual harassment is a little worse then bad manners.. bad manners is speaking with your mouth full at the table, although that could leave psychological damage I'd say it would occur a little more in cases of sexual harassment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Immoderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wollongong NSW
Posts: 2,302
|
Exactly!
Are we allowing the courts, manipulated by lawyers skills, to draw the line for us? Have the courts become the the law makers rather than the law appliers? Court rulings set presidents which become quasi law. Relating this to the topic at hand, have courts made "bad manners" - eg "Geez you got got a rack worth worth buying dinner for" repeated ten times - into something that requires legal action rather than a threat of castration.
__________________
The individual is hopeless without the group. The group is hopeless without its individuals. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Immoderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wollongong NSW
Posts: 2,302
|
Originally Posted by Jaydon
Manners is more than talking with your mouthful. It is everything from knowing when to shake hands to when to STFU, what time of the day to ask someone out that night to when to stop asking them out.
Being inept or uncultured or rude or inappropriate, ought not be something, I think, that must be handled by the law. Such ordinary transgressions ought to be handled by ordinary people.
__________________
The individual is hopeless without the group. The group is hopeless without its individuals. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
SCTC
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Queensland, Gold Coast
Posts: 1,101
ICC Handle: Aussieboy007
FICS Handle: Bermusia
|
Originally Posted by Iconoclast
Sure but it usually becomes illegal either because the harasser is very rich... or because things get out of hand. Not because they wont stop asking you out but because perhaps they keep trying to grab at something they shouldn't or if they are acting very intimidating, perhaps even suggesting that if they don't do something for them then that could have a negative impact. Plus you are using sexual harassment as a general term but not knowing when to stop asking someone out wouldn't apply to a situation where the victim is 9 years old.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Immoderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wollongong NSW
Posts: 2,302
|
Jaydon, you make many very good point here. (Highlighted)
Originally Posted by Jaydon
I agree with all the highlighted. So what does a photo of Miss XYZ from "New Idea" placed on the notice board qualify as? Sexual harassment? The courts say yes.
__________________
The individual is hopeless without the group. The group is hopeless without its individuals. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
SCTC
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Queensland, Gold Coast
Posts: 1,101
ICC Handle: Aussieboy007
FICS Handle: Bermusia
|
Well yes I think cases like that are completely stupid and the victim only has a problem with it because they'll get some good money out of it. People say you shouldn't undermine their situation because they were told how attractive they were a few too many times and it really hurt their feelings
Of course a few million should fix the immense scarring caused by something of such a horrific nature
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Byron Bay, NSW
Posts: 2,821
|
I was sexually harrassed by about 30 girls once for a year and I loved it (then I woke up). But I know if unwanted the victim can become quite depressed and repel from a work situation and therefore lose will to work etc. So a strong response is necessary.
But some cases where a hot female teacher took on a 16 y o male student (whom loved it) I think the reaction is overboard, in spite of lack of trust etc that has been breached. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Reality Analyst
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,498
|
I was once taken advantage of by a marauding gang of highly sexed gerbils .
__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Reality Analyst
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,498
|
you're thinking of Goebbels.
and whats more , you should be disgusted in yourself for coming up with such a depraved notion ![]() ...actually , ....you might have just sexually harassed me then .
__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom Last edited by Axiom : 08-15-2010 at 04:14 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Byron Bay, NSW
Posts: 2,821
|
I remember years ago when a groups of American girls locked up some evangaelising Mormons and somehow managed to rape them, they were locked up in prison, they were just to bring the silly guys out of the clouds and down to earth. Figuratively and literally.
The Mormons not just proved that they were not just stupid for being Mormons but also for complaining about the girls. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Byron Bay, NSW
Posts: 2,821
|
I am going to arrange for a female friend of mine to join the same co as myself, than I agressively sexually harrass her, she gets a fortune and we split the loot - and her enjoying every sec of my harrassament. Beauty
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Reality Analyst
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,498
|
Originally Posted by antichrist
yep , that's worthy of a Reality Analyst award .
![]() ![]()
__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|