Go Back   OzChess - Australia's Chess Forum > Discussions Not Related to Chess (Non-Chess) > Non-Chess Related Discussion
Connect with Facebook

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 04-27-2010, 09:45 AM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Hayek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 93
Question Free Market Capitalism

Keeping with the strong political theme in this section, I thought I would start this thread. I am a strong supporter of free market capitalism, but over the past couple of years (especially with the whole financial crisis) I have found that there is a lot of misinformation out there about free markets. Just wondering if there are any doubters of free market capitalism here (maybe someone who even thinks the recent crisis was the result of free markets?) who wanted to discuss the matter in a civil manner.
Hayek is offline  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 03:09 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
antichrist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Byron Bay, NSW
Posts: 2,821
Default

Originally Posted by Hayek View Post
Keeping with the strong political theme in this section, I thought I would start this thread. I am a strong supporter of free market capitalism, but over the past couple of years (especially with the whole financial crisis) I have found that there is a lot of misinformation out there about free markets. Just wondering if there are any doubters of free market capitalism here (maybe someone who even thinks the recent crisis was the result of free markets?) who wanted to discuss the matter in a civil manner.

you have got to be joking. You don't think the resident conspiracy theoriest we have here would ever believe that markets are free - it is all a conspiracy and that was revealed in weekend SMH as well. The market is full of paid inside informants - info wars in a different context but just as important to some money poeple. The whole market is contaminated - see what happened to Lehmann and Goldman Sachs? All crooks from go to oh (oh dear there goes my money so from oh to go as well)
antichrist is offline  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 03:11 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
antichrist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Byron Bay, NSW
Posts: 2,821
Default

The markets currently decides that a surrogate mother in India for Aussie male homosexual couples going over wanting a baby fathered by one or bother of them is about $40,000 - is this fair value?
antichrist is offline  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 04:25 PM   #4 (permalink)
Tin Cup Champ 2004
 
Just2Good's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cairns
Posts: 6,233
ICC Handle: Advantage
FICS Handle: Advantage
Default

Originally Posted by antichrist View Post
The markets currently decides that a surrogate mother in India for Aussie male homosexual couples going over wanting a baby fathered by one or bother of them is about $40,000 - is this fair value?
For the baby or for the couple?
__________________
.
"The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing."

~ Isaiah Berlin ~
Just2Good is offline  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 05:13 PM   #5 (permalink)
Immoderator
 
Iconoclast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wollongong NSW
Posts: 2,302
Default

Originally Posted by antichrist View Post
The markets currently decides that a surrogate mother in India for Aussie male homosexual couples going over wanting a baby fathered by one or bother of them is about $40,000 - is this fair value?
It is commodification of humans (children.) It shares the same ethics as slavery i.e. ownership of humans (children) for money. 100% immoral, with no up-side.
__________________
The individual is hopeless without the group.
The group is hopeless without its individuals.
Iconoclast is offline  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 08:42 PM   #6 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Firegoat7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Getting owned by White in the Dragon and trying to recover lost positions from shock paralysis OTB
Posts: 2,044
ICC Handle: guest
Default

Originally Posted by Hayek View Post
Keeping with the strong political theme in this section, I thought I would start this thread. I am a strong supporter of free market capitalism, but over the past couple of years (especially with the whole financial crisis) I have found that there is a lot of misinformation out there about free markets. Just wondering if there are any doubters of free market capitalism here (maybe someone who even thinks the recent crisis was the result of free markets?) who wanted to discuss the matter in a civil manner.
Interesting choice of names for a new poster. Are you a hydra account?


Nevertheless,I don't believe in "free market" as a concept. I am also willing to debate almost anything about capitalism. So feel free to begin a civil discussion.

cheers,
__________________
"...What I meant?

Dear Mr Ian Rout (ACF news publisher) could you please put Ozchessforum in the next news letter! There is no reason to hide this forum from the Australian chess public.

What they meant?

Sorry, No english!- Amir Karibasic


Firegoat7 is offline  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2010, 12:12 AM   #7 (permalink)
MOZ
Volunteer
 
MOZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ozchess is the marginalised cyber-spot where cc-Mods choose to engage with cc-banned posters.
Posts: 3,541
Default

Originally Posted by Firegoat7 View Post
Interesting choice of names for a new poster. Are you a hydra account?


...
I can see no evidence of that.
__________________
FReedom though Fischer-Random chess to enjoy the whole game.
MOZ is offline  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2010, 05:54 AM   #8 (permalink)
Member
 
Hayek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 93
Default

Originally Posted by antichrist View Post
you have got to be joking. You don't think the resident conspiracy theoriest we have here would ever believe that markets are free - it is all a conspiracy and that was revealed in weekend SMH as well. The market is full of paid inside informants - info wars in a different context but just as important to some money poeple. The whole market is contaminated - see what happened to Lehmann and Goldman Sachs? All crooks from go to oh (oh dear there goes my money so from oh to go as well)
What happened to Goldman Sachs and Lehman is the result of moral hazard, it is completely explainable and in fact, expected considering the free insurance government provided.

As for the conspiracy comments, I am not sure what you are getting at and I don't really know who the resident conspiracy theorist here is since I just joined.

Originally Posted by antichrist View Post
The markets currently decides that a surrogate mother in India for Aussie male homosexual couples going over wanting a baby fathered by one or bother of them is about $40,000 - is this fair value?
What relevance does this have to free markets?

Originally Posted by Firegoat7 View Post
Interesting choice of names for a new poster. Are you a hydra account?
Not sure what "hydra account" means exactly, but I am a real person and this is my sole account if that helps.


Originally Posted by Firegoat7 View Post
Nevertheless,I don't believe in "free market" as a concept.
Care to explain why?
Hayek is offline  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2010, 09:45 AM   #9 (permalink)
MOZ
Volunteer
 
MOZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ozchess is the marginalised cyber-spot where cc-Mods choose to engage with cc-banned posters.
Posts: 3,541
Default Need assistance from Mod or Admin

Issue #1
There is a post by the poster named Hayek constructed in response to the post at #5 in this thread.

The Hayak post is not viewable to the general posters atm.
It cannot be seen by Hayek.

He has PM'd me to ask if it has been moderated.

Could an authorised moderator, or Admin please investigate and make public why this post is on IGNORE atm.

Issue #2

I am unable to respond to Hayek's PM.
Can it be explained why this is blocked?

tks
MOZ*
__________________
FReedom though Fischer-Random chess to enjoy the whole game.
MOZ is offline  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2010, 11:28 AM   #10 (permalink)
Member
 
Hayek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 93
Default

Oh sorry about that MOZ, I thought you were an admin

edit: also weird is that this post shows. I guess I'll try writing up another post with what I was saying. Ok, just made another post and that one doesn't show either. I got a chance to read the thank you for posting message though and now I know it is because the posts are being moderated. Why only some are and not all, I have no idea.

Last edited by Hayek : 04-30-2010 at 11:43 AM
Hayek is offline  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2010, 03:00 PM   #11 (permalink)
Tin Cup Champ 2004
 
Just2Good's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cairns
Posts: 6,233
ICC Handle: Advantage
FICS Handle: Advantage
Default

Originally Posted by Iconoclast View Post
It is commodification of humans (children.) It shares the same ethics as slavery i.e. ownership of humans (children) for money. 100% immoral, with no up-side.
The child will not grow up in poverty. That's an upside. Its still immoral, admittedly, but there is an upside.

Originally Posted by MOZ View Post
The Hayak post is not viewable to the general posters atm. It cannot be seen by Hayek. He has PM'd me to ask if it has been moderated.
It was caught by the spam filter because he has less than ten posts, and 'homo' along with related words that start with those 4 letters, is a spam key word. So when he quoted AC, the filter did its job and mod queued his post.
__________________
.
"The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing."

~ Isaiah Berlin ~
Just2Good is offline  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2010, 04:27 PM   #12 (permalink)
MOZ
Volunteer
 
MOZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ozchess is the marginalised cyber-spot where cc-Mods choose to engage with cc-banned posters.
Posts: 3,541
Default

Originally Posted by Hayek View Post
What happened to Goldman Sachs and Lehman is the result of moral hazard, it is completely explainable and in fact, expected considering the free insurance government provided.

As for the conspiracy comments, I am not sure what you are getting at and I don't really know who the resident conspiracy theorist here is since I just joined.

What relevance does this have to free markets?

Not sure what "hydra account" means exactly, but I am a real person and this is my sole account if that helps.



Care to explain why?


Originally Posted by Just2Good View Post
The child will not grow up in poverty. That's an upside. Its still immoral, admittedly, but there is an upside.
Originally Posted by Just2Good View Post

It was caught by the spam filter because he has less than ten posts, and 'homo' along with related words that start with those 4 letters, is a spam key word. So when he quoted AC, the filter did its job and mod queued his post.
Thanks J2G.
I knew a real Admin would know the answer.
__________________
FReedom though Fischer-Random chess to enjoy the whole game.
MOZ is offline  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2010, 04:51 PM   #13 (permalink)
Tin Cup Champ 2004
 
Just2Good's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cairns
Posts: 6,233
ICC Handle: Advantage
FICS Handle: Advantage
Default

Originally Posted by MOZ View Post
Thanks J2G.
I knew a real Admin would know the answer.
__________________
.
"The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing."

~ Isaiah Berlin ~
Just2Good is offline  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 12:47 PM   #14 (permalink)
Member
 
Hayek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 93
Default

Any skeptics care to share their concerns with a capitalist system?
Hayek is offline  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2010, 04:29 AM   #15 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Firegoat7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Getting owned by White in the Dragon and trying to recover lost positions from shock paralysis OTB
Posts: 2,044
ICC Handle: guest
Default

Originally Posted by Hayek View Post

Care to explain why?
IMO The term "free market" is an oxymoron.

In my life experience , I have NEVER been able to purchase goods at a market for free. On the rare occasion where I have been a the seller in the marketplace, I have always insisted on being compensated with money. I have heard on good authority that printing your own money for free is an illegal act, punishable with a prison sentence.

cheers,
__________________
"...What I meant?

Dear Mr Ian Rout (ACF news publisher) could you please put Ozchessforum in the next news letter! There is no reason to hide this forum from the Australian chess public.

What they meant?

Sorry, No english!- Amir Karibasic


Firegoat7 is offline  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Go Back   OzChess - Australia's Chess Forum > Discussions Not Related to Chess (Non-Chess) > Non-Chess Related Discussion


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:



All times are GMT +11. The time now is 12:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Copyright © 2000-2010 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

The views and opinions expressed in posts on this site are exclusively those of the member who made them, and do not represent the views or opinions of OzChess or OzChess's owners. OzChess does not endorse any post, and makes no representations about the truth or accuracy of any matter contained in any post made by members of this site.