Go Back   OzChess - Australia's Chess Forum > Discussions Not Related to Chess (Non-Chess) > News & Contemporary Issues
Connect with Facebook

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 02-01-2009, 11:39 PM   #31 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
AzzX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 109
Default

I agree climate change doesn't just constitute global warming though. There are a number of factors and contributing elements and as Jaz mentioned, things like orbital and solar variations. Human induced climate change is what we have to worry about in the short term.
Colonisation of other planets just seems like a fairy tale.
__________________
azzx.org
ozsource
AzzX is offline  

Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 05:00 PM   #32 (permalink)
Tin Cup Champ 2004
 
Just2Good's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cairns
Posts: 6,056
ICC Handle: Advantage
FICS Handle: Advantage
Default

Originally Posted by AzzX View Post
Colonisation of other planets just seems like a fairy tale.
Clearly the science isn't there yet to make this a reality, but I do think eventually it will become achievable.
__________________
.
"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete."

~ Buckminster Fuller ~
Just2Good is online now  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2009, 06:28 AM   #33 (permalink)
Jaz
Member
 
Jaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 87
Default

I don't think worrying ever helped anyone and I think its the same with climate change. The first thing should be finding out if it is induced by humans. The truth is that nobody knows. Furthermore we don't know if we can stop it and then how to stop it, but we are already collecting carbon taxes, banning plasma tv's, are (talking about) killing cows and other cattle, because they fart too much and contribute for more CO2 in the atmosphere. It is not a joke.
Jaz is offline  

Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2009, 01:33 PM   #34 (permalink)
Tin Cup Champ 2004
 
Just2Good's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cairns
Posts: 6,056
ICC Handle: Advantage
FICS Handle: Advantage
Default

Originally Posted by Jaz View Post
...we are already ... talking about killing cows and other cattle, because they fart too much ... It is not a joke.
Well, it sounds funny!
__________________
.
"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete."

~ Buckminster Fuller ~
Just2Good is online now  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2009, 03:59 PM   #35 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Axiom Support Group's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Laku, Ishmaelia
Posts: 137
Default

Originally Posted by Arrogant-One View Post
Well, it sounds funny!
Haha I had a yummy hamburger today for lunch and didn't even think about the killing the cow part
Axiom Support Group is offline  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2009, 01:06 PM   #36 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Simon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 162
Default

Originally Posted by Axiom Support Group View Post
Haha I had a yummy hamburger today for lunch and didn't even think about the killing the cow part
That makes you a vegan
Simon is offline  

Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2009, 01:42 AM   #37 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Firegoat7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Getting owned by White in the Dragon and trying to recover lost positions from shock paralysis OTB
Posts: 1,924
ICC Handle: guest
Default more doom and gloom....

Hi,

This latest global warming news from New Scientist is quite disturbing.
Here is the link....How to survive the coming century - environment - 25 February 2009 - New Scientist


I found this quote quite bemusing "...Humans are in a pretty difficult position and I don't think they are clever enough to handle what's ahead. I think they'll survive as a species all right, but the cull during this century is going to be huge," he says. "The number remaining at the end of the century will probably be a billion or less."

I can just hear those religous peckerhead types ranting....repent the end of the world is nigh....

cheers,
__________________
"...What I meant?

Dear Mr Ian Rout (ACF news publisher) could you please put Ozchessforum in the next news letter! There is no reason to hide this forum from the Australian chess public.

What they meant?

Sorry, No english!- Amir Karibasic


Firegoat7 is offline  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2009, 02:20 AM   #38 (permalink)
Reality Analyst
 
Axiom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,498
Default

Originally Posted by Firegoat7 View Post
Hi,

This latest global warming news from New Scientist is quite disturbing.
Here is the link....How to survive the coming century - environment - 25 February 2009 - New Scientist


I found this quote quite bemusing "...Humans are in a pretty difficult position and I don't think they are clever enough to handle what's ahead. I think they'll survive as a species all right, but the cull during this century is going to be huge," he says. "The number remaining at the end of the century will probably be a billion or less."

I can just hear those religous peckerhead types ranting....repent the end of the world is nigh....

cheers,
Certainly great PR for the eugenics agenda
Axiom is offline  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2009, 11:49 AM   #39 (permalink)
Tin Cup Champ 2004
 
Just2Good's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cairns
Posts: 6,056
ICC Handle: Advantage
FICS Handle: Advantage
Default

Originally Posted by Firegoat7 View Post
I found this quote quite bemusing "...Humans are in a pretty difficult position and I don't think they are clever enough to handle what's ahead. I think they'll survive as a species all right, but the cull during this century is going to be huge," he says. "The number remaining at the end of the century will probably be a billion or less."
To be fair there is a school of thought that says the world is probably over populated, including countries like Australia which should have around 15 million people at most. The Malthusian theory already stated that human death would result from things like food shortages, climate change, etc, so that concept is not really very novel.
__________________
.
"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete."

~ Buckminster Fuller ~
Just2Good is online now  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 04:36 AM   #40 (permalink)
Jaz
Member
 
Jaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 87
Default

Australian Government Spends 17 million Dollars To Get Farm Animals To Fart less!

"In its ongoing quest to reduce the emissions of gases blamed for climate change - and placate grumbling green activists - the Australian government has earmarked 17 million dollars for research into how to prevent the country's 120 million farm animals from emitting so much me"

So basically the taxmoney goes into researching BS, literally.
Jaz is offline  

Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 11:18 PM   #41 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
AzzX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 109
Default

Originally Posted by Jaz View Post

So basically the taxmoney goes into researching BS, literally.
Nothing much has changed then

In a radio interview, Burke acknowledged that Australian farmers would have to pay for the new project, through increased transportation and input costs.
That's from the article and proves yet again what little thought has gone into this 17 million project.
  • 85 million sheep
  • 31 million beef
  • 3 million goats
Just pay for a refillable filter to be strapped to the animals backside and charge the people that eat the product - problem solved
__________________
azzx.org
ozsource
AzzX is offline  

Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 01:57 PM   #42 (permalink)
Member
 
cume's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 94
Default

Originally Posted by Arragont-One
To be fair there is a school of thought that says the world is probably over populated, including countries like Australia which should have around 15 million people at most
As far as the cities go. If only Australia had cities in the middle of the country in desert areas like in America. Instead the biggest you can get are places like Alice Springs, Broken Hill and Mount Isa.
cume is offline  

Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 01:48 AM   #43 (permalink)
Jaz
Member
 
Jaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 87
Default

EU Lunatics Want to Tax Livestock Farts

I think it couldn't get more absurd than that, oh I think it can - next, lets tax breathing, I'm sure air will get much cleaner that way just like with the carbon and soon livestock taxes. I think it is utter rubbish. They havent't even proved that human activity causes global warming and they are already taxing the s*** out of us.
Jaz is offline  

Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009, 03:37 AM   #44 (permalink)
Reality Analyst
 
Axiom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,498
Default

Nobody listens to the real climate change experts - Telegraph
Axiom is offline  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009, 04:42 PM   #45 (permalink)
Tin Cup Champ 2004
 
Just2Good's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cairns
Posts: 6,056
ICC Handle: Advantage
FICS Handle: Advantage
Default

The link won't work for me. Can you please cut and paste it and then use quote tags?
__________________
.
"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete."

~ Buckminster Fuller ~
Just2Good is online now  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Go Back   OzChess - Australia's Chess Forum > Discussions Not Related to Chess (Non-Chess) > News & Contemporary Issues


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:



All times are GMT +11. The time now is 07:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Copyright © 2000-2010 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

The views and opinions expressed in posts on this site are exclusively those of the member who made them, and do not represent the views or opinions of OzChess or OzChess's owners. OzChess does not endorse any post, and makes no representations about the truth or accuracy of any matter contained in any post made by members of this site.