Faine-ing A Defence To The Indefensible - Page 4 - OzChess

**antichrist** · 12-09-2010, 11:54 AM

Originally Posted by Igor Goldenberg

It has been known, but conveniently not reported in major media, for quite some time.
Even though situation might've changed in the last few years since I stopped following those news.

Well it was the West and UN who set up these Sheik kingdoms instead of allowing nationalist democracies based on historical boundaries. The West wanted to divide and rule to get the oild.

So what the West soweth the West harvesteth

**Axiom** · 12-11-2010, 12:40 AM

Originally Posted by WikiTwit

Heard tonight on the the ABC News that more cables have been released by the Wikileaks.org web-site.
This error detracts from the national broadcasters credibility since that particular web-site has been down due to DOS actions by the US (alleged) for more than 5 days. Whether the link reference is an inaccuracy, or a deliberate mis-emphasis needs explanation by the ABC.

Given that Wikileaks is in formal partnership with 5 international masterheads (incl Der Spiegel, The Guardian, The New York Times) and it is known that the mastheads are controlling which cables are released for paper-media view, and the US military is being offered right of veto over any cable if it endangers life, before publication of the cable, then for the ABC to say Wikileaks.org is releasing the cables is simplistic, and misleading.

Wikileaks has many mirror-sites which means they can in a sophistic way get away with only saying 'wikileaks.org' . This aspect was conveniently omitted in this article........ why? .......because the abc are a pack of unwitting ill-informing gatekeeping dogs .

**antichrist** · 12-11-2010, 06:08 PM

Originally Posted by Axiom

Wikileaks has many mirror-sites which means they can in a sophistic way get away with only saying 'wikileaks.org' . This aspect was conveniently omitted in this article........ why? .......because the abc are a pack of unwitting ill-informing gatekeeping dogs .

Oh oh oh axiom, you are so jealous that Wikileaks have upstaged you conspiracy theorists by about 5,000 % - you have become irrelevant coz they provided proof

**Axiom** · 12-11-2010, 06:23 PM

Originally Posted by antichrist

Oh oh oh axiom, you are so jealous that Wikileaks have upstaged you conspiracy theorists by about 5,000 % - you have become irrelevant coz they provided proof

you hysterical eye-rolling mutton , of the "hey its on tv it must be true" cult !

your post is so founded in non reality as to be a living testament to your abject cluelessness .

for your sake and everyone else's , please catch up , at - Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind! and Jeff Rense Program

**WikiTwit** · 12-11-2010, 07:25 PM

Originally Posted by Axiom

Wikileaks has many mirror-sites which means they can in a sophistic way get away with only saying 'wikileaks.org' . This aspect was conveniently omitted in this article........ why? .......because the abc are a pack of unwitting ill-informing gatekeeping dogs .

Unwitting?

This is the core of my original post. My view then was the reference to wikileaks.org was probably a deliberate mis-emphasis.
However, events are moving so fast on this historic issue that further posts by me will be direct in INFOWARS. Because that is what the battle has become.
I quote John Perry Barlow : "The first serious INFOWAR is now engaged. The field of battle is Wilikleaks. You are the troops".

Perhaps one could argue that 'religion' was War #1.
The troops have exposed themselves.
It but remains to seen if which media sides with the troops, and which media sides with the politicians and business-men being exposed.

It is no longer about Julian Assange. It is now The Partnership and troops versus Who.

12-09-2010, 11:54 AM	#46 (permalink)
antichrist Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Byron Bay, NSW Posts: 2,821	Originally Posted by Igor Goldenberg It has been known, but conveniently not reported in major media, for quite some time. Even though situation might've changed in the last few years since I stopped following those news. Well it was the West and UN who set up these Sheik kingdoms instead of allowing nationalist democracies based on historical boundaries. The West wanted to divide and rule to get the oild. So what the West soweth the West harvesteth

12-11-2010, 12:40 AM	#47 (permalink)
Axiom Reality Analyst Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Australia Posts: 3,498	Originally Posted by WikiTwit Heard tonight on the the ABC News that more cables have been released by the Wikileaks.org web-site. This error detracts from the national broadcasters credibility since that particular web-site has been down due to DOS actions by the US (alleged) for more than 5 days. Whether the link reference is an inaccuracy, or a deliberate mis-emphasis needs explanation by the ABC. Given that Wikileaks is in formal partnership with 5 international masterheads (incl Der Spiegel, The Guardian, The New York Times) and it is known that the mastheads are controlling which cables are released for paper-media view, and the US military is being offered right of veto over any cable if it endangers life, before publication of the cable, then for the ABC to say Wikileaks.org is releasing the cables is simplistic, and misleading. Wikileaks has many mirror-sites which means they can in a sophistic way get away with only saying 'wikileaks.org' . This aspect was conveniently omitted in this article........ why? .......because the abc are a pack of unwitting ill-informing gatekeeping dogs . __________________ "Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom

12-11-2010, 06:08 PM	#48 (permalink)
antichrist Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Byron Bay, NSW Posts: 2,821	Originally Posted by Axiom Wikileaks has many mirror-sites which means they can in a sophistic way get away with only saying 'wikileaks.org' . This aspect was conveniently omitted in this article........ why? .......because the abc are a pack of unwitting ill-informing gatekeeping dogs . Oh oh oh axiom, you are so jealous that Wikileaks have upstaged you conspiracy theorists by about 5,000 % - you have become irrelevant coz they provided proof

12-11-2010, 06:23 PM	#49 (permalink)
Axiom Reality Analyst Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Australia Posts: 3,498	hysterical eye-rolling mutton Originally Posted by antichrist Oh oh oh axiom, you are so jealous that Wikileaks have upstaged you conspiracy theorists by about 5,000 % - you have become irrelevant coz they provided proof you hysterical eye-rolling mutton , of the "hey its on tv it must be true" cult ! your post is so founded in non reality as to be a living testament to your abject cluelessness . for your sake and everyone else's , please catch up , at - Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind! and Jeff Rense Program __________________ "Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom Last edited by Axiom : 12-11-2010 at 07:43 PM

12-11-2010, 07:25 PM	#50 (permalink)
WikiTwit Junior Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 15	Originally Posted by Axiom Wikileaks has many mirror-sites which means they can in a sophistic way get away with only saying 'wikileaks.org' . This aspect was conveniently omitted in this article........ why? .......because the abc are a pack of unwitting ill-informing gatekeeping dogs . Unwitting? This is the core of my original post. My view then was the reference to wikileaks.org was probably a deliberate mis-emphasis. However, events are moving so fast on this historic issue that further posts by me will be direct in INFOWARS. Because that is what the battle has become. I quote John Perry Barlow : "The first serious INFOWAR is now engaged. The field of battle is Wilikleaks. You are the troops". Perhaps one could argue that 'religion' was War #1. The troops have exposed themselves. It but remains to seen if which media sides with the troops, and which media sides with the politicians and business-men being exposed. It is no longer about Julian Assange. It is now The Partnership and troops versus Who.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread: