Iconoclast

Keep your vommitBecause you are going to have to eat it fo rthe calories.

__________________
The individual is hopeless without the group.
The group is hopeless without its individuals.

Axiom

or conversely utilise all the billions of hectares of unused arable land

__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom

Axiom

Canadian Newspaper Calls for Malthusian Global Population Reduction Policy


Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
December 10, 2009

Diane Francis, writing for Canada’s Financial Post, begins an editorial by declaring a myth — the world is over-populated. “The ‘inconvenient truth’ overhanging the UN’s Copenhagen conference is not that the climate is warming or cooling, but that humans are overpopulating the world,” she writes. “A planetary law, such as China’s one-child policy, is the only way to reverse the disastrous global birthrate currently, which is one million births every four days.”

An interesting choice of words. Planetary law. In other words, a world government with the power to decide if humans are allowed to procreate.
featured stories Canadian Newspaper Calls for Malthusian Global Population Reduction Policy


China’s brutal totalitarian rulers base their Malthusian depopulation program on Mao Zedong’s reading of Marxist theory on population growth, an idea Marx took from Thomas Malthus.


Currently we do not have such a world government. Behind the scenes at Copenhagen, however, the powerbrokers are working feverishly to establish the sort of world government only partially imagined by Ms. Francis.

The elite realized a big victory when they anointed the Bilderberg and Trilateral commission member Herman Van Rompuy as the “permanent” (and unelected) president of the European Union. Van Rompuy declared 2009 the “first year of global governance” and said Copenhagen is “another step towards the global management of our planet.”

It is also interesting that Francis cited China’s notorious one-child policy as the desired template. The totalitarian rulers of China have enforced a one-child policy since 1979. It is modern eugenics in practice. “China currently has Galton-era eugenics laws on the books which only allow pre-approved couples to marry and have children,” writes Daniel Taylor. “The Law of the People’s Republic of China on Maternal and Infant Health Care states that if the approved couples children are deemed to be inferior they are to be terminated.”

China’s draconian eugenics program is supported the Rockefellers, a clan of infamous eugenicists. The Washington Post reported on October 12, 2000 that the Rockefeller Foundation had donated two million dollars to upgrade a Chinese drug factory that produces the abortion drug RU-486. “RU-486 has been a key ingredient in China’s population control strategy for years. Of the estimated 10 million abortions performed annually in China, about half are carried out with RU-486, said Gao Ersheng, director of the Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research,” the CIA’s favorite newspaper reported.

The globalist United Nations — soon to be cast off as useless (it was revealed this week in Copenhagen) — is largely responsible for fostering China’s one-child policy.

China’s brutal totalitarian rulers base their Malthusian depopulation program on Mao Zedong’s reading of Marxist theory on population growth, an idea Marx took from Thomas Malthus.
The British economist argued in favor of “positive checks” on population. Positive checks are those, according to Thomas Malthus, that increase the death rate, specifically disease, war, disaster, and finally, when other checks are ineffective, famine. Of course, when Malthus formulated his macabre philosophy in 1798, the modern totalitarian dictatorship had yet to come into existence.



Mao was a master at eliminating humans he deemed either inferior or belonging to the wrong social class. Mao, like Stalin, killed more people than Hitler. Unlike the mass murder campaign in the Soviet Union that began years after the October Revolution, Mao started killing people almost immediately after taking power. He starved millions to death under a forced agricultural collectivization program. Mao considered these collectivized farms too individualistic, so he forced millions of peasants into communes where family life, traditions, personal property and privacy, personal initiative and individual freedom were drummed out of the victims.

The Khmer Rouge in Cambodia would later attempt to follow Mao’s lead and killed more than 20% of the population under the rule of Pol Pot.

Mao’s so-called Great Leap Forward in industrialization killed at least 30 million Chinese, mostly through famine. A few years later, Mao launched his Cultural Revolution and purged and executed large numbers of Communist Party members and intellectuals. The Cultural Revolution killed an additional 10-15 million.

China’s so-called communist rulers continued Mao’s brutal policies after his death. In 1989 the government engaged in the methodical murder of an estimated 2,000-3,000 demonstrators in Tiananmen Square. Others have put the number at over 12,000. However, the murderous zeal of Mao has waned in China. Political criminals are no longer killed in large numbers. Instead, political criminals are sent to “re-education” camps and exploited as state-owned assets (an undetermined number of these state assets are harvested for their internal organs).

“Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose,” a praiseful David Rockefeller has gushed (New York Times, August 10, 1973). “The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.”

Rockefeller and the New World Order gang are chomping at the bit to bring Mao’s lessons to Europe and especially America where “high morale and community of purpose” need to be inflicted on a population that still remembers, however vaguely, the example of Jefferson and Madison.

Part of the plan is to drastically scale back the population through eugenics. The “recalibration” of humanity Diane Francis writes about so glowingly in her editorial published by the Financial Times on December 8 is well underway in the form of genetically modified food, a systematic poisoning of the population through water and product fluoridation, and degradation of the environment through industrial and military pollution (which the Ford and Rockefeller foundation environmentalists ignore in favor of the contrived scam they call “climate change,” formerly global warming before it was revealed as a scientifically disprovable fallacy).

The New World Order will ultimately have no use for Ms. Francis or the rest of us, who are considered interlopers and trespassers on a planet they consider their property.

__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom

antichrist

Of course overpopulation is a myth - go and have another 6bill souls to prove it

Axiom

Strong Reaction Follows Editorial Calling for Global One-child Dictatorship



Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Friday, December 11, 2009



An article featured in Canada’s Financial Post newspaper calling for China’s draconian one child policy, where woman are kidnapped off the streets, drugged, and forced to undergo compulsory abortions, to be imposed worldwide has been met with widespread hostile reaction, yet such measures are being debated at the United Nations climate summit in Copenhagen.

In her editorial published on Tuesday, columnist Diane Francis wrote that, “A planetary law, such as China’s one-child policy, is the only way to reverse the disastrous global birthrate.”

Just days later, the Chinese government delegation at the Copenhagen climate change conference argued that the Communist dictatorship’s one child policy should “serve as a model for integrating population programs into the framework of climate change adaptation.”

As we have exhaustively documented, the overpopulation myth is often cited by control freak phony environmentalists as a justification for the implementation of drastic policies, yet it has no basis in reality whatsoever.

Due to falling fertility rates globally, humans will soon stop replacing themselves and population numbers will naturally fall.

Populations in developed countries are declining, only in third world countries are they expanding dramatically. Industrialization itself levels out population trends and even despite this world population models routinely show that the earth’s population will level out at 9 billion in 2050 and slowly decline after that. “The population of the most developed countries will remain virtually unchanged at 1.2 billion until 2050,” states a United Nations report. The UN’s support for depopulation policies is in direct contradiction to their own findings.

Once a country industrializes, there is an average of a 1.6 child rate per household, so the western world population is actually in decline. That trend has also been witnessed in areas of Asia like Japan and South Korea. The UN has stated that global population will peak at 9 billion and then begin declining.

Since radical environmentalists are pushing to de-industrialize the world in the face of the so called CO2 threat, this will reverse the trend that naturally lowers the amount of children people have. If climate change fanatics are allowed to implement their policies, global population will continue to increase and overpopulation may become a real problem – another example of how the global warming hysterics are actually harming the long term environment of the earth by preventing overpopulated countries from developing and naturally lowering their birth levels.

As is the norm with these so-called “liberals” who espouse modern-day eugenics, what they are advocating are the most illiberal, inhumane and barbarous policies imaginable – a Hitlerian final solution in the name of saving Mother Earth.

We need to call out these people for what they are – would-be mass murderers who are advocating arcane and brutal programs of global eugenics that have no place in the 21st century.

Francis’ poorly written diatribe is not only absent of facts, it is shockingly devoid of any notion of compassion or humanity for what a global implementation of China’s one child policy will entail.

China’s one child policy is enforced by way of forced abortions, infanticide and compulsory sterilization.

Somewhere in the region of twenty-five million men in China are unable to find brides because so many girls are murdered shortly after birth. The explosion in the illegal sex trade in Asia is also a direct result of the shortage of women.

In many cases, women are literally kidnapped off the street by state goons from the “Birth Control Office,” driven to government hospitals, drugged, and their child is forcibly aborted.

In one case earlier this year, both a young woman and her baby were killed after such an abduction in Liaocheng City.

“According to a Doctor at the hospital where the two died, the young woman was kidnapped by the “Birth Control Office” and taken to the hospital where she was forced to undergo an abortion procedure,” reported the Epoch Times.

“The young woman fought with staff to protect her unborn child however a half a dozen men, pushed her down on a bed and injected her with a drug to induce labor. After the young woman had a still birth, she developed a massive hemorrhage and soon thereafter died.”

This is the kind of tyrannical regime Francis is calling to be introduced worldwide.

Policies introduced in the name of cutting CO2 emissions are already killing millions of people in the third world. The implementation of policies arising out of fraudulent fearmongering and biased studies on global warming is already devastating the third world, with a doubling in food prices as a result of the introduction of biofuels causing mass starvation and death.

If Diane Francis is so keen on getting rid of stupid people that breed too much, then maybe she should step forward as the first candidate. As with all these control freaks, people like Ted Turner who calls for a 95% population reduction yet has five children and is the largest land owner in North America with some 2 million acres, they are utter hypocrites – do as I say not as I do. Francis herself has two children, according to her Wikipedia biography – one more than what she says the rest of the world should be allowed to have by decree of the dictatorial system of government she is proposing.

On the positive side, the reaction to Francis’ editorial has been vehement, furious and hostile to the kind of authoritarian hell she is pushing. Comments in response to her article were almost universally in opposition, as were callers to radio shows that she subsequently appeared on.

A selection of responses to Francis’ disgusting diatribe are reprinted below.

“Diane Francis was on a talk radio show the same morning this article was published. NOBODY agreed with her. I mean nobody at all. People can see through this Eugenics bullshit. The walls are closing in on the elite scum of the earth.”

“You make me ashamed of living in Canada. If you’re a first-born, it’s too bad your mother had you and if you’re not, she should have started with you. You are a heartless, dirty woman and shame on you. Ask the Chinese people who fled their country and came to Canada and the U.S. exactly why they’re here. Hang your head in shame.”

“That this Malthusian junk science is still proposed from time to time speaks of the fact that some in academia just refuse to learn from empirical evidence. And now it’s slipped into journalism. The management of the Financial Post should be quite embarrassed. I’ll just stick to the WSJ and not bother coming back here again. An editorial board that thinks that this is worthy of publication couldn’t possibly know how to edit a newspaper / website.”

“I am currently reading “War and Genocide” by Bergen and it strikes me that these horrible Nazi ideas keep coming back.With Nazism it was a “scientific” eugenics that led to forced abortions, sterilizations, heavy fines, etc. for some who dared procreate. For Francis, it is a “scientific” environmentalism that will lead to the exact same evils for all (except, of course, herself).”

“It’s hard to believe that this opinionated rant is called journalism. I saw no evidence of journalistic balance, fairness, and objectivity. She made NO mention of the grave problems caused by the One-Child Policy in China, including: forced sterilizations and abortions, heavy fines, disparate sex ratio, infanticide of females, increase in mental health problems (including Chinese women’s suicide rates)…”

“This reporter is a complete nut job. I can’t believe anyone in a North American country would actually believe this is a legitimate idea. And by the way, China’s policy has had major consequences. many girl babies were aborted and killed, and due to the scarcity of Chinese women, Chinese men are paying through the nose to obtain brides. Therefore, lives are unfulfilled, and the Chinese population decreases much further than they even desired.”

“And so one must wonder, what kind of journalism does this article or “column” represent? Which of her children would Diane Francis give up in order to live up to her death rhetoric? One might also ask, what kind of a self-professed do-gooder wants to have power over others in order to “help” them? Who, after all, are these elites who keep telling us that we need to be better controlled, “for our own good, you see”?”

__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom

antichrist

[QUOTE=antichrist;22257]Of course overpopulation is a myth - go and have another 6bill souls to prove it[/quote]

doesn't this short snappy retort deserve a reply -say something original rather than just reposting from somewhere else

antichrist

I am still waiting. admit that another 6 billion souls would stuff our world up

Axiom

Admit you're uninformed .

__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom

antichrist

you answer my question first

Axiom

ok, answer is 'no'.

__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom

antichrist

I am already finding Byron beach too crowded during peaktimes in summer, with double the numbers it would be shocking, already the traffic cant move and backs up all way to highway

Axiom

yes , 'density' is a curious concept...

__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom

Axiom

One Child Policy: The Case For Killing Junior | LoanSafe.org

__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom

Axiom

Depopulation Fanatics, Eugenicists Launch “Objective� Global Population Study

__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom

Ehm TO

Don't forget to add that a reason for the population decrease in the 19th century was attributed partially to the fact that families were creating emotional bonds with their children and no longer needed to try and rear 6 children to tend the fields and support the family.