9/11 - Page 2 - OzChess

**LMatheson** · 09-11-2009, 09:16 AM

Originally Posted by Axiom

is that enough ?

any questions ?

Just give me a few days to read through it Ax

**Excalibur_Sapiens** · 09-11-2009, 11:27 AM

Originally Posted by Axiom

is that enough ?

any questions ?

None from me.

**hobsonbay player** · 09-11-2009, 02:26 PM

If anyone investigates AJ will discover he is fraud over time .Many of his

articles have no disclaimer at bottom of them .Another question is

if he believes in freedom of speech why does he cut people of air if they

questions his motives ? Many things just dont add up with him.

lam refering to investigations into 9/11 terror attacks suggesting it was

planned demolition then attack on American soil.

Anyone else have any opinion on right-wing hard-liner AJ the radio jock ?

**hobsonbay player** · 09-11-2009, 03:43 PM

For all conspiracy theorists just (ax) to suggest WTC7 was a controlled

Demolition are simply jumping at shadows .The property owner Silverstein had

lease for long time including insurancepolicy against any terrorist's attack .So

why demolish building like that unless it was insurance scam ? but to risk

those fireman really doesnt make any sense .But in history conspiracy

theorist's always try to hang there hat on something .

**Just2Good** · 09-11-2009, 04:05 PM

Originally Posted by hobsonbay player

Most of people who think its inside job probably have a gripe with US adminstration one way or other... Its people who cant accept what happen and looking to blame government.

I would like to nominate this as a post of the month!

**Axiom** · 09-11-2009, 04:40 PM

**Axiom** · 09-11-2009, 04:43 PM

9/11 Facts

11 Remarkable Facts About 9/11

**Just2Good** · 09-11-2009, 04:58 PM

Originally Posted by Axiom

Does he have a University degree, or just an opinion?

**hobsonbay player** · 09-11-2009, 04:58 PM

Charlie sheen is known to take high risk's ,he was addicted to cocaine and

Alcohol around 10 years ago so it very difficult believe what's credible whats

not and again person like AJ would exploit what he can from a converstion

with a celebrity on his webite to draw in masses of people just like with Obama .

**Axiom** · 09-11-2009, 05:15 PM

Originally Posted by hobsonbay player

If anyone investigates AJ will discover he is fraud over time .Many of his

articles have no disclaimer at bottom of them .Another question is

if he believes in freedom of speech why does he cut people of air if they

questions his motives ? Many things just dont add up with him.

lam refering to investigations into 9/11 terror attacks suggesting it was

planned demolition then attack on American soil.

Anyone else have any opinion on right-wing hard-liner AJ the radio jock ?

9/11 has nothing to do with alex jones !

read all the credible people that question the 9/11 story , including 6 of the 10 on the NIST commission that had doubts ,misgivings,grievances with their own findings , one even saying there is a "cover up" !

read all the facts above , make up your own mind ,instead of swallowing whole, mainstream media's account, and coming to a conclusion based on scant data.

read all the facts above

read up on the history of false flags

read up on the PNAC document calling for such a catalytic type event

**Axiom** · 09-11-2009, 05:25 PM

Originally Posted by hobsonbay player

For all conspiracy theorists just (ax) to suggest WTC7 was a controlled

Demolition are simply jumping at shadows .

even when thermite was found iin the debris , even though no other building has collapsed at near free fall speed from fires but wtc7 , that silverstein said "pull it" , even though scientists and engineers favour the demolition theory ?

Originally Posted by hobsonbay player

The property owner Silverstein had

lease for long time including insurancepolicy against any terrorist's attack .So

why demolish building like that unless it was insurance scam ? but to risk

those fireman really doesnt make any sense .But in history conspiracy

theorist's always try to hang there hat on something .

silverstein took lease out only months prior to attack, ensuring a huge windfall for known white elephant of twin towers , most offices empty and was losing money .

you think they care about firemen ?????
they have let them die uncared for from respiratory illness cause by the air born debris !

you think they care about the victim's families ???
when the victim's family organised group , demands a new investigation ?

i'm not a conspiracy theorist looking to hang a hat on something , merely presenting you with facts ( ones your tv wont tell you) and letting you analyse the full spectrum of data , rather than forming conclusions based on such a narrow band width.

**Axiom** · 09-11-2009, 05:29 PM

Originally Posted by hobsonbay player

Charlie sheen is known to take high risk's ,he was addicted to cocaine and

Alcohol around 10 years ago so it very difficult believe what's credible whats

not and again person like AJ would exploit what he can from a converstion

with a celebrity on his webite to draw in masses of people just like with Obama .

again, you refuse to address the concerns of credible people nor the facts presented .
again lost in the personalities of the messenger at the cost of the message.

incidently , why would sheen risk his wealth and status by being seen as a crackpot ? maybe he really is convinced through rational thinking that the official 9/11 story is faulty ?

**Just2Good** · 09-11-2009, 08:24 PM

Originally Posted by Axiom

read all the facts above , make up your own mind ,instead of swallowing whole, mainstream media's account, and coming to a conclusion based on scant data.

Ax,

You could read a library of 'credible reports', but that wouldn't change the fact that Islamic extremists flew planes into building on 11 September 2001, and this had nothing to do with the US government, Bilderberg, etc. Their motives were clearly religion based.

Normal people do not commit suicide by flying planes into buildings. No government can pay a person to do something like that, hence no government conspiracy exists here.

**Axiom** · 09-11-2009, 08:29 PM

Originally Posted by Arrogant-One

Ax,

You could read a library of 'credible reports', but that wouldn't change the fact that Islamic extremists flew planes into building on 11 September 2001, and this had nothing to do with the US government, Bilderberg, etc.

How do you know this ?

Originally Posted by Arrogant-One

Normal people do not commit suicide by flying planes into buildings. No government can pay a person to do something like that, hence no government conspiracy exists here.

there are many possibilities ,like 'allowing' it to occur , all im asserting like countless other credible people , and the majority of the usa population,is that 9/11 needs a re investigation, based on the facts.

**Just2Good** · 09-11-2009, 08:35 PM

Originally Posted by Axiom

How do you know this ?

Because I saw the planes fly into the buildings.

09-11-2009, 09:16 AM	#16 (permalink)
LMatheson Siberian Chess Cub Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 318	Originally Posted by Axiom is that enough ? any questions ? Just give me a few days to read through it Ax

09-11-2009, 11:27 AM	#17 (permalink)
Excalibur_Sapiens Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 53	Originally Posted by Axiom is that enough ? any questions ? None from me.

09-11-2009, 02:26 PM	#18 (permalink)
hobsonbay player Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 179	Alex jones fraud If anyone investigates AJ will discover he is fraud over time .Many of his articles have no disclaimer at bottom of them .Another question is if he believes in freedom of speech why does he cut people of air if they questions his motives ? Many things just dont add up with him. lam refering to investigations into 9/11 terror attacks suggesting it was planned demolition then attack on American soil. Anyone else have any opinion on right-wing hard-liner AJ the radio jock ?

09-11-2009, 03:43 PM	#19 (permalink)
hobsonbay player Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 179	Wtc7 For all conspiracy theorists just (ax) to suggest WTC7 was a controlled Demolition are simply jumping at shadows .The property owner Silverstein had lease for long time including insurancepolicy against any terrorist's attack .So why demolish building like that unless it was insurance scam ? but to risk those fireman really doesnt make any sense .But in history conspiracy theorist's always try to hang there hat on something .

09-11-2009, 04:05 PM	#20 (permalink)
Just2Good Tin Cup Champ 2004 Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Cairns Posts: 6,054 ICC Handle: Advantage FICS Handle: Advantage	Originally Posted by hobsonbay player Most of people who think its inside job probably have a gripe with US adminstration one way or other... Its people who cant accept what happen and looking to blame government. I would like to nominate this as a post of the month! __________________ . "You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete." ~ Buckminster Fuller ~

09-11-2009, 04:40 PM	#21 (permalink)
Axiom Reality Analyst Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Australia Posts: 3,498

09-11-2009, 04:43 PM	#22 (permalink)
Axiom Reality Analyst Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Australia Posts: 3,498	9/11 Facts 11 Remarkable Facts About 9/11

09-11-2009, 04:58 PM	#23 (permalink)
Just2Good Tin Cup Champ 2004 Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Cairns Posts: 6,054 ICC Handle: Advantage FICS Handle: Advantage	Originally Posted by Axiom Does he have a University degree, or just an opinion? __________________ . "You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete." ~ Buckminster Fuller ~

09-11-2009, 04:58 PM	#24 (permalink)
hobsonbay player Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 179	Charlie Sheen Charlie sheen is known to take high risk's ,he was addicted to cocaine and Alcohol around 10 years ago so it very difficult believe what's credible whats not and again person like AJ would exploit what he can from a converstion with a celebrity on his webite to draw in masses of people just like with Obama .

09-11-2009, 05:15 PM	#25 (permalink)
Axiom Reality Analyst Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Australia Posts: 3,498	Originally Posted by hobsonbay player If anyone investigates AJ will discover he is fraud over time .Many of his articles have no disclaimer at bottom of them .Another question is if he believes in freedom of speech why does he cut people of air if they questions his motives ? Many things just dont add up with him. lam refering to investigations into 9/11 terror attacks suggesting it was planned demolition then attack on American soil. Anyone else have any opinion on right-wing hard-liner AJ the radio jock ? 9/11 has nothing to do with alex jones ! read all the credible people that question the 9/11 story , including 6 of the 10 on the NIST commission that had doubts ,misgivings,grievances with their own findings , one even saying there is a "cover up" ! read all the facts above , make up your own mind ,instead of swallowing whole, mainstream media's account, and coming to a conclusion based on scant data. read all the facts above read up on the history of false flags read up on the PNAC document calling for such a catalytic type event Last edited by Axiom : 09-11-2009 at 08:21 PM

09-11-2009, 05:25 PM	#26 (permalink)
Axiom Reality Analyst Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Australia Posts: 3,498	Originally Posted by hobsonbay player For all conspiracy theorists just (ax) to suggest WTC7 was a controlled Demolition are simply jumping at shadows . even when thermite was found iin the debris , even though no other building has collapsed at near free fall speed from fires but wtc7 , that silverstein said "pull it" , even though scientists and engineers favour the demolition theory ? Originally Posted by hobsonbay player The property owner Silverstein had lease for long time including insurancepolicy against any terrorist's attack .So why demolish building like that unless it was insurance scam ? but to risk those fireman really doesnt make any sense .But in history conspiracy theorist's always try to hang there hat on something . silverstein took lease out only months prior to attack, ensuring a huge windfall for known white elephant of twin towers , most offices empty and was losing money . you think they care about firemen ????? they have let them die uncared for from respiratory illness cause by the air born debris ! you think they care about the victim's families ??? when the victim's family organised group , demands a new investigation ? i'm not a conspiracy theorist looking to hang a hat on something , merely presenting you with facts ( ones your tv wont tell you) and letting you analyse the full spectrum of data , rather than forming conclusions based on such a narrow band width. Last edited by Axiom : 09-11-2009 at 08:33 PM

09-11-2009, 05:29 PM	#27 (permalink)
Axiom Reality Analyst Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Australia Posts: 3,498	Originally Posted by hobsonbay player Charlie sheen is known to take high risk's ,he was addicted to cocaine and Alcohol around 10 years ago so it very difficult believe what's credible whats not and again person like AJ would exploit what he can from a converstion with a celebrity on his webite to draw in masses of people just like with Obama . again, you refuse to address the concerns of credible people nor the facts presented . again lost in the personalities of the messenger at the cost of the message. incidently , why would sheen risk his wealth and status by being seen as a crackpot ? maybe he really is convinced through rational thinking that the official 9/11 story is faulty ? Last edited by Axiom : 09-11-2009 at 08:20 PM

09-11-2009, 08:24 PM	#28 (permalink)
Just2Good Tin Cup Champ 2004 Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Cairns Posts: 6,054 ICC Handle: Advantage FICS Handle: Advantage	Originally Posted by Axiom read all the facts above , make up your own mind ,instead of swallowing whole, mainstream media's account, and coming to a conclusion based on scant data. Ax, You could read a library of 'credible reports', but that wouldn't change the fact that Islamic extremists flew planes into building on 11 September 2001, and this had nothing to do with the US government, Bilderberg, etc. Their motives were clearly religion based. Normal people do not commit suicide by flying planes into buildings. No government can pay a person to do something like that, hence no government conspiracy exists here. __________________ . "You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete." ~ Buckminster Fuller ~

09-11-2009, 08:29 PM	#29 (permalink)
Axiom Reality Analyst Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Australia Posts: 3,498	Originally Posted by Arrogant-One Ax, You could read a library of 'credible reports', but that wouldn't change the fact that Islamic extremists flew planes into building on 11 September 2001, and this had nothing to do with the US government, Bilderberg, etc. How do you know this ? Originally Posted by Arrogant-One Normal people do not commit suicide by flying planes into buildings. No government can pay a person to do something like that, hence no government conspiracy exists here. there are many possibilities ,like 'allowing' it to occur , all im asserting like countless other credible people , and the majority of the usa population,is that 9/11 needs a re investigation, based on the facts.

09-11-2009, 08:35 PM	#30 (permalink)
Just2Good Tin Cup Champ 2004 Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Cairns Posts: 6,054 ICC Handle: Advantage FICS Handle: Advantage	Originally Posted by Axiom How do you know this ? Because I saw the planes fly into the buildings. __________________ . "You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete." ~ Buckminster Fuller ~

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread: