New World Order - OzChess

**Axiom** · 03-15-2009, 05:29 AM

**Axiom** · 03-16-2009, 01:08 AM

**Axiom** · 03-16-2009, 01:28 AM

Do you remember a time when only "kooks" spoke of plans for a new world order , and now it's talked about by bush,brown,clinton and kissinger ?

Do you remember a time when only "kooks" spoke of microchipping human beings , and now it is happening ?

Do you remember a time when only "kooks" spoke of the bilderberg group whilst the media denied its existence , and now its existence is undeniable ?

Do you remember a time when only "kooks" spoke of a global financial collapse followed by designs for greater centralised banking regulation and control , and now it is happening ?

Do you remember ?

Is the smell of "coffee" permeating the olfactory centers of your neural synapsis ?

Isn't it time to listen to these "kooks" and what they are speaking about TODAY ? -
"Kooks" like
Alex Jones Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!
David Icke David Icke Website - Home
Jeff Rense Jeff Rense Program
Alan Watt Cutting Through the Matrix with Alan Watt - Clearing the rubbish from the road to reality

Isn't it time ?

Do you remember ?

Isn't it time ?

Do you remember ?

**AzzX** · 03-18-2009, 11:14 PM

Love the Sci fi feel to the video - impressive stuff.
To be honest a united planet with one currency doesn't sound like such a bad idea. It has been the topic of many science fiction books in the past with the type of totalitarian control outlined in these videos, yet I cannot see such negative changes happening. If we start to understand we are all people of the Earth and stop regionalising our existence, maybe we can rise above the processes that dictate our lives.

**Axiom** · 03-18-2009, 11:17 PM

Originally Posted by AzzX

Love the Sci fi feel to the video - impressive stuff.
To be honest a united planet with one currency doesn't sound like such a bad idea. It has been the topic of many science fiction books in the past with the type of totalitarian control outlined in these videos, yet I cannot see such negative changes happening. If we start to understand we are all people of the Earth and stop regionalising our existence, maybe we can rise above the processes that dictate our lives.

you've certainly absorbed the propaganda well , not that i can blame you , most people are programmed to believe this from cradle to grave via schooling ,media and the engineered cultural zeitgeist, whilst completely oblivious to the historical fact of the dangers of increased centralised control.

**Just2Good** · 03-20-2009, 06:28 PM

Originally Posted by Axiom

you've certainly absorbed the propaganda well , not that i can blame you , most people are programmed to believe this from cradle to grave via schooling ,media and the engineered cultural zeitgeist, whilst completely oblivious to the historical fact of the dangers of increased centralised control.

What dangers? There are substantial benefits, but I can't see any dangers.

**Axiom** · 03-20-2009, 06:37 PM

Originally Posted by Arrogant-One

What dangers? There are substantial benefits, but I can't see any dangers.

"power corrupts , absolute power corrupts absolutely"

**Just2Good** · 03-20-2009, 06:55 PM

Originally Posted by Axiom

"power corrupts , absolute power corrupts absolutely"

Okay, thats a good point. However, as long as the judiciary is independent and elections are held regularly, there should be no problem.

**AzzX** · 03-20-2009, 06:57 PM

It would still need to be a democratic type of Government though and I can only see the Western world being united.

**Axiom** · 03-20-2009, 07:23 PM

Originally Posted by Arrogant-One

Okay, thats a good point. However, as long as the judiciary is independent and elections are held regularly, there should be no problem.

but the judiciary is not independent see how supreme court judges in usa are appointed by govt !
and elections are a farce as i've pointed out , a "choice" between corporate run ,media gatekept faux options.

**Axiom** · 03-23-2009, 11:29 PM

NSC advisor Jones: “I take my daily orders from Dr. Kissinger”

**Just2Good** · 03-25-2009, 02:50 PM

Originally Posted by Axiom

but the judiciary is not independent see how supreme court judges in usa are appointed by govt !

Are we talking about Australia or the USA here?

**Axiom** · 03-25-2009, 10:29 PM

Originally Posted by Arrogant-One

Are we talking about Australia or the USA here?

USA

**Just2Good** · 03-25-2009, 11:13 PM

Originally Posted by Axiom

USA

Well that's too bad for your argument then. In the past some presidents have threatened to swamp the US Supreme Court with justices because they Court hasn't rolled over for them. One president said the biggest mistake he ever made as president was appointing a certain judge to the US Supreme Court. The independence of the US Supreme Court is well established.

**Axiom** · 04-04-2009, 03:30 AM

New World Order: Still A Conspiracy Theory?

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Friday, April 3, 2009

New World Order: Still A Conspiracy Theory?

Despite the fact that the term “new world order” was mentioned in connection with the G20 this week hundreds of times by both global leaders and in news reports, it is still regarded as a “conspiracy theory” by that bastion of truthiness, Wikipedia.

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown himself yesterday announced that the G20 heralded the creation of a “new world order” which would involve increased global regulation of economic markets.

A Google News search provides well over a thousand results of reports including the term “new world order” over the past couple of weeks.

Despite the fact that world leaders have been talking about a “new world order” for decades, in the context of the political agenda to diminish the power of sovereign states in favor of a move towards global governance, it was still regarded as a delusion of paranoid conspiracy theorists by the establishment media until relatively recently.

Now even Fox News and Sean Hannity are throwing their arms in the air and admitting that the “conspiracy theorists were right” as the agenda for global government is openly announced.

However, the online encyclopedia Wikipedia, which is notorious for being completely infested with maniacally obsessive trolls, crooked insiders, and establishment apologists, claims that in its warped version of reality, the “new world order” as a sinister concept is still a nebulous conspiracy theory.

New World Order: Still A Conspiracy Theory?

New World Order: So-called “conspiracy theorists” had to endure decades of ridicule for daring to claim such a political agenda existed - now it’s openly discussed in every major news outlet.

New World Order: Still A Conspiracy Theory?

But according to Wikipedia, it’s still a “conspiracy theory”.

Wikipedia attempts to make the differentiation by claiming that the new world order in the context of a sinister, undemocratic, and ultimately totalitarian political agenda, is a characterization embraced only by paranoid conspiracy theorists.

Presumably, Wikipedia is only willing to accept the fact that an agenda to create a new world order exists if that new world order equates to a happy, loving, positive move, where world bankers and global elitists really have the best interests of all of us at heart. Forgive us for being somewhat skeptical of that conclusion.

In reality, as we have exhaustively documented, the new world order has nothing to do with saving the world and everything to do with centralizing power and control into the hands of a gaggle of criminal globalists who are concerned about nothing other than increasing their domination over the planet - at the expense of the rest of the population.

The new world order is totalitarian by its very nature - shifting power away from sovereign countries to global institutions which have no accountability to the general public whatsoever, and through which the public has no voice or influence. That cannot be defined as anything else but undemocratic. There is no such thing as a “benign” new world order.

This very agenda was again enunciated this week by World Bank President and and Bilderberg elitist Robert Zoellick, who openly admitted the plan to eliminate national sovereignty and impose a global government during a speech on the eve of the G20 summit.

Speaking about the agenda to increase not just funding but power for international organizations on the back of the financial crisis, Zoellick stated, “If leaders are serious about creating new global responsibilities or governance, let them start by modernising multilateralism to empower the WTO, the IMF, and the World Bank Group to monitor national policies.”

Proponents of a new world order have always disguised their rhetoric with flowery notions of achieving some kind of global utopia, but behind the scenes the real agenda has always been sinister, nepotistic and anathema to any reasonable notion of democratic freedom.

It’s about time the establishment media stopped parroting the words of globalists and blithely repeating the term “new world order” like it was going out of fashion, and actually started asking real questions about what it really means.

New World Order: Still A Conspiracy Theory?

03-15-2009, 05:29 AM	#1 (permalink)
Axiom Reality Analyst Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Australia Posts: 3,498	New World Order

03-16-2009, 01:28 AM	#3 (permalink)
Axiom Reality Analyst Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Australia Posts: 3,498	Do You Remember ? Do you remember a time when only "kooks" spoke of plans for a new world order , and now it's talked about by bush,brown,clinton and kissinger ? Do you remember a time when only "kooks" spoke of microchipping human beings , and now it is happening ? Do you remember a time when only "kooks" spoke of the bilderberg group whilst the media denied its existence , and now its existence is undeniable ? Do you remember a time when only "kooks" spoke of a global financial collapse followed by designs for greater centralised banking regulation and control , and now it is happening ? Do you remember ? Is the smell of "coffee" permeating the olfactory centers of your neural synapsis ? Isn't it time to listen to these "kooks" and what they are speaking about TODAY ? - "Kooks" like Alex Jones Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind! David Icke David Icke Website - Home Jeff Rense Jeff Rense Program Alan Watt Cutting Through the Matrix with Alan Watt - Clearing the rubbish from the road to reality Isn't it time ? Do you remember ? Isn't it time ? Do you remember ? Last edited by Axiom : 03-16-2009 at 06:36 PM

03-18-2009, 11:14 PM	#4 (permalink)
AzzX Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Melbourne Posts: 109	Love the Sci fi feel to the video - impressive stuff. To be honest a united planet with one currency doesn't sound like such a bad idea. It has been the topic of many science fiction books in the past with the type of totalitarian control outlined in these videos, yet I cannot see such negative changes happening. If we start to understand we are all people of the Earth and stop regionalising our existence, maybe we can rise above the processes that dictate our lives. __________________ azzx.org ozsource

03-18-2009, 11:17 PM	#5 (permalink)
Axiom Reality Analyst Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Australia Posts: 3,498	Originally Posted by AzzX Love the Sci fi feel to the video - impressive stuff. To be honest a united planet with one currency doesn't sound like such a bad idea. It has been the topic of many science fiction books in the past with the type of totalitarian control outlined in these videos, yet I cannot see such negative changes happening. If we start to understand we are all people of the Earth and stop regionalising our existence, maybe we can rise above the processes that dictate our lives. you've certainly absorbed the propaganda well , not that i can blame you , most people are programmed to believe this from cradle to grave via schooling ,media and the engineered cultural zeitgeist, whilst completely oblivious to the historical fact of the dangers of increased centralised control.

03-20-2009, 06:28 PM	#6 (permalink)
Just2Good Tin Cup Champ 2004 Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Cairns Posts: 6,056 ICC Handle: Advantage FICS Handle: Advantage	Originally Posted by Axiom you've certainly absorbed the propaganda well , not that i can blame you , most people are programmed to believe this from cradle to grave via schooling ,media and the engineered cultural zeitgeist, whilst completely oblivious to the historical fact of the dangers of increased centralised control. What dangers? There are substantial benefits, but I can't see any dangers. __________________ . "You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete." ~ Buckminster Fuller ~

03-16-2009, 01:08 AM	#2 (permalink)
Axiom Reality Analyst Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Australia Posts: 3,498

03-20-2009, 06:37 PM	#7 (permalink)
Axiom Reality Analyst Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Australia Posts: 3,498	Originally Posted by Arrogant-One What dangers? There are substantial benefits, but I can't see any dangers. "power corrupts , absolute power corrupts absolutely"

03-20-2009, 06:55 PM	#8 (permalink)
Just2Good Tin Cup Champ 2004 Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Cairns Posts: 6,056 ICC Handle: Advantage FICS Handle: Advantage	Originally Posted by Axiom "power corrupts , absolute power corrupts absolutely" Okay, thats a good point. However, as long as the judiciary is independent and elections are held regularly, there should be no problem. __________________ . "You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete." ~ Buckminster Fuller ~

03-20-2009, 06:57 PM	#9 (permalink)
AzzX Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Melbourne Posts: 109	It would still need to be a democratic type of Government though and I can only see the Western world being united. __________________ azzx.org ozsource

03-20-2009, 07:23 PM	#10 (permalink)
Axiom Reality Analyst Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Australia Posts: 3,498	Originally Posted by Arrogant-One Okay, thats a good point. However, as long as the judiciary is independent and elections are held regularly, there should be no problem. but the judiciary is not independent see how supreme court judges in usa are appointed by govt ! and elections are a farce as i've pointed out , a "choice" between corporate run ,media gatekept faux options.

03-23-2009, 11:29 PM	#11 (permalink)
Axiom Reality Analyst Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Australia Posts: 3,498	Here's Your So Called Democratically Elected Representatives ! NSC advisor Jones: “I take my daily orders from Dr. Kissinger”

03-25-2009, 02:50 PM	#12 (permalink)
Just2Good Tin Cup Champ 2004 Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Cairns Posts: 6,056 ICC Handle: Advantage FICS Handle: Advantage	Originally Posted by Axiom but the judiciary is not independent see how supreme court judges in usa are appointed by govt ! Are we talking about Australia or the USA here? __________________ . "You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete." ~ Buckminster Fuller ~

03-25-2009, 10:29 PM	#13 (permalink)
Axiom Reality Analyst Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Australia Posts: 3,498	Originally Posted by Arrogant-One Are we talking about Australia or the USA here? USA

03-25-2009, 11:13 PM	#14 (permalink)
Just2Good Tin Cup Champ 2004 Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Cairns Posts: 6,056 ICC Handle: Advantage FICS Handle: Advantage	Originally Posted by Axiom USA Well that's too bad for your argument then. In the past some presidents have threatened to swamp the US Supreme Court with justices because they Court hasn't rolled over for them. One president said the biggest mistake he ever made as president was appointing a certain judge to the US Supreme Court. The independence of the US Supreme Court is well established. __________________ . "You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete." ~ Buckminster Fuller ~

04-04-2009, 03:30 AM	#15 (permalink)
Axiom Reality Analyst Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Australia Posts: 3,498	New World Order: Still A Conspiracy Theory? Paul Joseph Watson Prison Planet.com Friday, April 3, 2009 New World Order: Still A Conspiracy Theory? Despite the fact that the term “new world order” was mentioned in connection with the G20 this week hundreds of times by both global leaders and in news reports, it is still regarded as a “conspiracy theory” by that bastion of truthiness, Wikipedia. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown himself yesterday announced that the G20 heralded the creation of a “new world order” which would involve increased global regulation of economic markets. A Google News search provides well over a thousand results of reports including the term “new world order” over the past couple of weeks. Despite the fact that world leaders have been talking about a “new world order” for decades, in the context of the political agenda to diminish the power of sovereign states in favor of a move towards global governance, it was still regarded as a delusion of paranoid conspiracy theorists by the establishment media until relatively recently. Now even Fox News and Sean Hannity are throwing their arms in the air and admitting that the “conspiracy theorists were right” as the agenda for global government is openly announced. However, the online encyclopedia Wikipedia, which is notorious for being completely infested with maniacally obsessive trolls, crooked insiders, and establishment apologists, claims that in its warped version of reality, the “new world order” as a sinister concept is still a nebulous conspiracy theory. New World Order: Still A Conspiracy Theory? New World Order: So-called “conspiracy theorists” had to endure decades of ridicule for daring to claim such a political agenda existed - now it’s openly discussed in every major news outlet. New World Order: Still A Conspiracy Theory? But according to Wikipedia, it’s still a “conspiracy theory”. Wikipedia attempts to make the differentiation by claiming that the new world order in the context of a sinister, undemocratic, and ultimately totalitarian political agenda, is a characterization embraced only by paranoid conspiracy theorists. Presumably, Wikipedia is only willing to accept the fact that an agenda to create a new world order exists if that new world order equates to a happy, loving, positive move, where world bankers and global elitists really have the best interests of all of us at heart. Forgive us for being somewhat skeptical of that conclusion. In reality, as we have exhaustively documented, the new world order has nothing to do with saving the world and everything to do with centralizing power and control into the hands of a gaggle of criminal globalists who are concerned about nothing other than increasing their domination over the planet - at the expense of the rest of the population. The new world order is totalitarian by its very nature - shifting power away from sovereign countries to global institutions which have no accountability to the general public whatsoever, and through which the public has no voice or influence. That cannot be defined as anything else but undemocratic. There is no such thing as a “benign” new world order. This very agenda was again enunciated this week by World Bank President and and Bilderberg elitist Robert Zoellick, who openly admitted the plan to eliminate national sovereignty and impose a global government during a speech on the eve of the G20 summit. Speaking about the agenda to increase not just funding but power for international organizations on the back of the financial crisis, Zoellick stated, “If leaders are serious about creating new global responsibilities or governance, let them start by modernising multilateralism to empower the WTO, the IMF, and the World Bank Group to monitor national policies.” Proponents of a new world order have always disguised their rhetoric with flowery notions of achieving some kind of global utopia, but behind the scenes the real agenda has always been sinister, nepotistic and anathema to any reasonable notion of democratic freedom. It’s about time the establishment media stopped parroting the words of globalists and blithely repeating the term “new world order” like it was going out of fashion, and actually started asking real questions about what it really means. New World Order: Still A Conspiracy Theory?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread: