Member Comments on Moderation - Page 7 - OzChess

**Bill Gletsos** · 10-08-2008, 12:05 AM

Originally Posted by Firegoat7

Antisense uses the same IP address as Kevin.
Kevin claims Antisense is a house mate.
We have asked Antisense to clarify the truth.
Antisense refuses to clarify the truth.

Result we presume the worst and Antisense gets banned.

At any moment when Antisense speaks up and takes responsibility for their account on Ozchess we will reverse the decision.

That is going to be rather difficult with their account banned.

Originally Posted by Firegoat7

P.S I don't hear you belly aching because Fg7 is banned on Chesschat for being a moderator on Ozhess, Bill?

Correct. As a mod there I support the chesschat policy of holding the admins/mods here responsible with regards this place allowing defamatory posts to remain.

**Firegoat7** · 10-08-2008, 12:15 AM

Originally Posted by Bill Gletsos

That is going to be rather difficult with their account banned.

Its only banned for 7 days. If they don't speak up soon it will be banned permanently.

Originally Posted by Bill Gletsos

Correct. As a mod there I support the chesschat policy of holding the admins/mods here responsible with regards this place allowing defamatory posts to remain.

Of course you are entiltled to your opinion. However in my opinion there is no defamation here and unless you prove it then it pretty much doesn't exist just based on heresay from amateurs.

But its good for Ozchess anyway that Chesschat has resorted to banning people like Moz and myself. So keep up the good work!

cheers ,

**Noddy** · 10-08-2008, 11:42 AM

People tend to get irate when their account gets banned.

**Jaydon** · 10-08-2008, 06:24 PM

Originally Posted by Noddy

People tend to get irate when their account gets banned.

yes he has already began whingeing on the other chess forum

However I could see his lack of motivation to cooperate as he may be a tad annoyed. But he's a big boy he can get over it and move on

**MOZ** · 10-08-2008, 08:02 PM

Originally Posted by PPWPFL

yes he has already began whingeing on the other chess forum
However I could see his lack of motivation to cooperate as he may be a tad annoyed. But he's a big boy he can get over it and move on

What you observe is allowable by AO (the ADMIN of Ozchess).
The alternate approach is documented in rule 117 and confirmed by rule 135, at chesschat.

**Jaydon** · 10-08-2008, 09:44 PM

Originally Posted by MOZ

What you observe is allowable by AO (the ADMIN of Ozchess).
The alternate approach is documented in rule 117 and confirmed by rule 135, at chesschat.

umm ok then. Yeh I do know who AO is. I wasn't defacing the other site if that is what you mean??

**MOZ** · 10-08-2008, 10:46 PM

Originally Posted by PPWPFL

umm ok then. Yeh I do know who AO is.

I have no problem with this.

I wasn't defacing the other site if that is what you mean??

And I have no problem your posts on chesschat.

But KB's post on chesschat (which you described) would appear inconsistent with the spirit of the two rules I quoted.

So, there is no issue for you answer.

Have a nice evening,

MOZ

**Jaydon** · 10-08-2008, 11:28 PM

Originally Posted by MOZ

I have no problem with this.

And I have no problem your posts on chesschat.

But KB's post on chesschat (which you described) would appear inconsistent with the spirit of the two rules I quoted.

So, there is no issue for you answer.

Have a nice evening,
MOZ

All is good then thanks for the reponse. You also have a good evening

**Thomas Bishop** · 10-09-2008, 02:38 AM

Originally Posted by PPWPFL

All is good then thanks for the reponse. You also have a good evening

I also wish to have a good evening.

**Jaydon** · 10-09-2008, 09:16 AM

Originally Posted by Thomas Bishop

I also wish to have a good evening.

Hey there is enough good evenings to go around mate

Take one if you desire.

**MOZ** · 10-09-2008, 09:17 AM

Originally Posted by MOZ

I have no problem with this.

And I have no problem your posts on chesschat.

But KB's post on chesschat (which you described) would appear inconsistent with the spirit of the two rules I quoted.

So, there is no issue for you answer.

Have a nice evening,
MOZ

In fact PPWPFL
I will seek permission from KB to post the completion of his sentence (which begins "Any public criticism of chesschat moderation... " in a PM of 08-06-2008, 12:10 AM
that will further your understanding.

MOZ*

**Jaydon** · 10-09-2008, 09:21 AM

Originally Posted by MOZ

In fact PPWPFL
I will seek permission from KB to post the completion of his sentence (which begins "Any public criticism of chesschat moderation... " in a PM of 08-06-2008, 12:10 AM
that will further your understanding.

MOZ*

Then a completion of the sentence it shall be!!

**MOZ** · 10-09-2008, 02:51 PM

Originally Posted by MOZ

What you observe is allowable by AO (the ADMIN of Ozchess).
The alternate approach is documented in rule 117 and confirmed by rule 135, at chesschat.

My use of the word rule has been objected to.

So much for economy of expression.
The thread title was Moderation Rules and Decisions.
Rather than truncate for economy to Rules, possibly I should have abbreviated the para. to
"The alternate approach is documented in ruling 117 and confirmed by ruling 135, at chesschat"

NTTIADWT.

**Gumshoe Mystery** · 10-11-2008, 02:53 PM

I have no idea what this thread is about?

**MOZ** · 10-11-2008, 05:44 PM

Originally Posted by Gumshoe Mystery

I have no idea what this thread is about?

hi GM
And I don't think your lack of knowledge will in any way give you regret.

Just skip it.

regards
MOZ*

10-08-2008, 12:05 AM	#91 (permalink)
Bill Gletsos Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 287	Originally Posted by Firegoat7 Antisense uses the same IP address as Kevin. Kevin claims Antisense is a house mate. We have asked Antisense to clarify the truth. Antisense refuses to clarify the truth. Result we presume the worst and Antisense gets banned. At any moment when Antisense speaks up and takes responsibility for their account on Ozchess we will reverse the decision. That is going to be rather difficult with their account banned. Originally Posted by Firegoat7 P.S I don't hear you belly aching because Fg7 is banned on Chesschat for being a moderator on Ozhess, Bill? Correct. As a mod there I support the chesschat policy of holding the admins/mods here responsible with regards this place allowing defamatory posts to remain.

10-08-2008, 12:15 AM	#92 (permalink)
Firegoat7 Playing backyard cricket Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: somewhere in virtual reality Posts: 605	Originally Posted by Bill Gletsos That is going to be rather difficult with their account banned. Its only banned for 7 days. If they don't speak up soon it will be banned permanently. Originally Posted by Bill Gletsos Correct. As a mod there I support the chesschat policy of holding the admins/mods here responsible with regards this place allowing defamatory posts to remain. Of course you are entiltled to your opinion. However in my opinion there is no defamation here and unless you prove it then it pretty much doesn't exist just based on heresay from amateurs. But its good for Ozchess anyway that Chesschat has resorted to banning people like Moz and myself. So keep up the good work! cheers , __________________ "...A thorough knowledge of the elements takes us more than half the road to mastership" - Aron Nimzowitsch

10-08-2008, 06:24 PM	#94 (permalink)
Jaydon Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Queensland, Gold Coast Posts: 172 ICC Handle: Aussieboy007 FICS Handle: Bermusia	Originally Posted by Noddy People tend to get irate when their account gets banned. yes he has already began whingeing on the other chess forum However I could see his lack of motivation to cooperate as he may be a tad annoyed. But he's a big boy he can get over it and move on

10-08-2008, 08:02 PM	#95 (permalink)
MOZ Figurehead absolute. Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: In the Margin Posts: 1,062	No rules, OK? Originally Posted by PPWPFL yes he has already began whingeing on the other chess forum However I could see his lack of motivation to cooperate as he may be a tad annoyed. But he's a big boy he can get over it and move on What you observe is allowable by AO (the ADMIN of Ozchess). The alternate approach is documented in rule 117 and confirmed by rule 135, at chesschat. __________________ I support the right to vote for moderators.

10-08-2008, 09:44 PM	#96 (permalink)
Jaydon Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Queensland, Gold Coast Posts: 172 ICC Handle: Aussieboy007 FICS Handle: Bermusia	Originally Posted by MOZ What you observe is allowable by AO (the ADMIN of Ozchess). The alternate approach is documented in rule 117 and confirmed by rule 135, at chesschat. umm ok then. Yeh I do know who AO is. I wasn't defacing the other site if that is what you mean??

10-08-2008, 11:42 AM	#93 (permalink)
Noddy Senior Member Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 134	People tend to get irate when their account gets banned.

10-08-2008, 10:46 PM	#97 (permalink)
MOZ Figurehead absolute. Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: In the Margin Posts: 1,062	Originally Posted by PPWPFL umm ok then. Yeh I do know who AO is. I have no problem with this. I wasn't defacing the other site if that is what you mean?? And I have no problem your posts on chesschat. But KB's post on chesschat (which you described) would appear inconsistent with the spirit of the two rules I quoted. So, there is no issue for you answer. Have a nice evening, MOZ __________________ I support the right to vote for moderators.

10-08-2008, 11:28 PM	#98 (permalink)
Jaydon Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Queensland, Gold Coast Posts: 172 ICC Handle: Aussieboy007 FICS Handle: Bermusia	Originally Posted by MOZ I have no problem with this. And I have no problem your posts on chesschat. But KB's post on chesschat (which you described) would appear inconsistent with the spirit of the two rules I quoted. So, there is no issue for you answer. Have a nice evening, MOZ All is good then thanks for the reponse. You also have a good evening

10-09-2008, 02:38 AM	#99 (permalink)
Thomas Bishop Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 39	Originally Posted by PPWPFL All is good then thanks for the reponse. You also have a good evening I also wish to have a good evening.

10-09-2008, 09:16 AM	#100 (permalink)
Jaydon Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Queensland, Gold Coast Posts: 172 ICC Handle: Aussieboy007 FICS Handle: Bermusia	Originally Posted by Thomas Bishop I also wish to have a good evening. Hey there is enough good evenings to go around mate Take one if you desire.

10-09-2008, 09:17 AM	#101 (permalink)
MOZ Figurehead absolute. Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: In the Margin Posts: 1,062	Originally Posted by MOZ I have no problem with this. And I have no problem your posts on chesschat. But KB's post on chesschat (which you described) would appear inconsistent with the spirit of the two rules I quoted. So, there is no issue for you answer. Have a nice evening, MOZ In fact PPWPFL I will seek permission from KB to post the completion of his sentence (which begins "Any public criticism of chesschat moderation... " in a PM of 08-06-2008, 12:10 AM that will further your understanding. MOZ* __________________ I support the right to vote for moderators.

10-09-2008, 09:21 AM	#102 (permalink)
Jaydon Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Queensland, Gold Coast Posts: 172 ICC Handle: Aussieboy007 FICS Handle: Bermusia	Originally Posted by MOZ In fact PPWPFL I will seek permission from KB to post the completion of his sentence (which begins "Any public criticism of chesschat moderation... " in a PM of 08-06-2008, 12:10 AM that will further your understanding. MOZ* Then a completion of the sentence it shall be!!

10-09-2008, 02:51 PM	#103 (permalink)
MOZ Figurehead absolute. Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: In the Margin Posts: 1,062	Originally Posted by MOZ What you observe is allowable by AO (the ADMIN of Ozchess). The alternate approach is documented in rule 117 and confirmed by rule 135, at chesschat. My use of the word rule has been objected to. So much for economy of expression. The thread title was Moderation Rules and Decisions. Rather than truncate for economy to Rules, possibly I should have abbreviated the para. to "The alternate approach is documented in ruling 117 and confirmed by ruling 135, at chesschat" NTTIADWT. __________________ I support the right to vote for moderators.

10-11-2008, 02:53 PM	#104 (permalink)
Gumshoe Mystery Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 141	I have no idea what this thread is about? __________________ Student Retreat \| Web Hosting from £1.95 a Month

10-11-2008, 05:44 PM	#105 (permalink)
MOZ Figurehead absolute. Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: In the Margin Posts: 1,062	Originally Posted by Gumshoe Mystery I have no idea what this thread is about? hi GM And I don't think your lack of knowledge will in any way give you regret. Just skip it. regards MOZ* __________________ I support the right to vote for moderators.

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.ozchess.com.au/forum-news-announcements/702-member-comments-moderation.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date
Restore A Deleted Member - Page 2 - vBulletin.org Forum	Post #0	Refback	10-21-2008 06:25 AM
Restore A Deleted Member - Page 2 - vBulletin.org Forum	Post #0	Refback	10-20-2008 08:57 PM
Restoration of Deleted Accounts? - vBulletin FAQ Forums	Post #0	Refback	10-17-2008 04:57 PM

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread: