![]() |
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 134
|
Originally Posted by Thomas Bishop
Why aren't you not sure? There is no public dispute regarding this match. The reason for the date change was not controversial.
Regarding the Kamsky - Topalov match, yes, that match is not yet confirmed and is still up in the air. I read somewhere that the Topalov camp was pressing hard to have the match held in Bulgaria but Kamsky wanted it somewhere else. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Perth
Posts: 147
|
Here is a recent interview of Anand where he talks about the upcoming match vs. Kramnik
ChessBase.com - Chess News - Mainz 2008: Anand on Carlsen, Morozevich and Polgar
__________________
Patzer see check, patzer give check! - Bobby Fischer |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 134
|
Originally Posted by Fischer-Fan
Who do you think is gonna win the world championship?
I think It's gonna be kramnik Both players have their advantages, but kramnik is too good in matches. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Tin Cup Champ 2004
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,682
ICC Handle: Just2Good
FICS Handle: Advantage
|
Kramnik is, or used to be a heavy smoker. That means Anand would probably clean the floor with him by the third round
![]() Best Regards, AO
__________________
. ... for it is always the person not in the predicament who knows what ought to have been done in it, and would unquestionably have done it too . . . ~ Charles Dickens novel ~ |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sydney, NSW
Posts: 127
|
Originally Posted by Noddy
I don't think Kramnik is all that good in matches. He used to lose them regularly (e.g. the "final" to Shirov, who then got dominated by Garry Kasparov).
But Anand does not have a waterproof match record either. But they're both in reasonably good form now, so it is an even matchup (Kramnik-Topalov was a bit of an upset, I thinkTopalov looked like the stronger player at the time). Everything hinges on what happens when Anand has White. If Kramnik can rely on a safe string of Petroffs, then Anand is in trouble, because one or two of those Catalans will go to Kramnik and probably none of them will go to Anand. On the other hand if the Petroff is faulty, then Kramnik has a big problem on his hands because the Berlin Wall is missing more than one brick, and the Sveshnikov is becoming a distant memory for Kramnik, not that he'd ever have the courage to use it in a match anyway though. So who knows? Maybe Kramnik will treat us to a solid version of the Caro-Kann.
__________________
“When you see a good move, look for a better one” - Emanuel Lasker |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 33
|
Kramnik may surprise us with his opening choice as black. These days Ruy Lopez Marshall attack has become a good choice for securing a draw. Even Aronian uses it with great success most of the time.
However, if he uses Petroff then Anand will need to find a novelty or two. I don't know what Anand will play as black, but probably the Nimzo/Queen's Indian because this us the universal choice at top level these days. Also, Grunfeld would be a good choice and all world championship matches have witnessed this opening at least once. Does anyone have any information about who the seconds will be for either Kramnik or Anand in the upcoming match? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|