Events at Box Hill Chess Club - Page 35 - OzChess

**MOZ** · 03-05-2010, 09:13 PM

Round 3 pairings

Code:

1	Leon Kempen	[2]	:	Rodolfo D'Onofrio	[2]
2	Henning Meldau	[2]	:	Allen Yu	[2]
3	Adam Hayman	[2]	:	Octavio Martinez	[2]
4	Jim Cannon	[1.5]	:	Marcus Raine	[1.5]
5	Roger Croft	[1.5]	:	Shane Lawson	[1]
6	Rad Chmiel	[1]	:	Max Chew Lee	[1]
7	Ollie Xue	[1]	:	Deniz Tuncer	[1]
8	Steven Guo	[1]	:	Bryan Ng	[1]
9	Eric Neymanis	[1]	:	John Ni	[1]
10	David Cannon	[1]	:	Michael Langley	[1]
11	Alec Yu	[1]	:	Andrew Barclay	[1]
12	Greg Rowlerson	[0]	:	Matthew Cheah	[.5]
13	Kenny Ngai	[0]	:	Surash Rai	[0]
14	Sam Gluzman	[0]	:	Adrian Chew Lee	[0]
15	Benjamin Yep	[0]	:	Alanna Chew Lee	[0]

The opportunities are multiplied with Allegros.
5 rounds a night
Guillotine finishes.

Arbiters can be much busier than usual.

**MOZ** · 03-06-2010, 05:17 PM

Code:

1.	Kempen, Leon		1684	1st
2.	Raine, Marcus		1659	
3.	Meldau, Henning		1421	
4.	Martinez, Octavio		1401	eq 2nd
5.	Lawson, Shane		1289	
6.	D'Onofrio, Rodolfo		1286	
7.	Chmiel, Rad		1209	
8.	Tuncer, Deniz		1157	
9.	Croft, Roger		1117	
10.	Ng, Bryan		1064	
11.	Cannon, Jim		1002	
12.	Yu, Allen		933	eq 2nd
13.	Neymanis, Eric		913	
14.	Hayman, Adam		905	eq 2nd
15.	Cannon, David		802	
16.	Rai, Suraj		801	
17.	Yu, Alec		791	
18.	Chew Lee, Max		736	eq 1st B div
19.	Rowlerson, Greg		701	
20.	Chew Lee, Adrian		669	
21.	Xue, Ollie		642	eq 1st B div
22.	Ni, John		638	
23.	Guo, Steven		577	
24.	Langley, Michael		501	
25.	Yep, Benjamin		501	
26.	Cheah, Matthew		495	
27.	Barclay, Andrew		372	Box Hill
28.	Ngai, Kenny		402	
29.	Gluzman, Sam		201	
30.	Chew Lee, Alanna		159

**MOZ** · 03-31-2010, 07:08 PM

Small turnout as there was no junior coaching session last night.
Nevertheless, some really competitive games were played.

At the end >

Code:

1	Raine, Marcus		1652	5
2	Lawson, Shane		1148	4
3	Croft, Roger		1116	3.5
4-6	Zelesco, Karl		889	3
	Chew Lee, Max		753	3
	Bergmanis, O		1188	3
7	Hayman, Adam		1024	2.5
8-9	Neymanis, Eric		913	2
	Lakshman, Vinay		1047	2
10-11	Chew Lee, A		650	1
	Gluzman, Sam		401	1
12	Chew Lee, Ala		128	0

**MOZ** · 04-07-2010, 08:42 PM

7.45 pm Friday the 9th of APRIL 2010

9 rounds

Last years cross-table.

$5 for members of CJCC or BHCC.
Visitors fee also applies to non-members.

**MOZ** · 04-16-2010, 09:30 PM

Code:

1	David A Flude	1173	[1]	:	Christopher Wallis	2067	[1]
2	Marcus Raine	1652	[1]	:	Shane Lawson	1148	[1]
3	Allen Yu	1116	[1]	:	Elsa Wei Chung Yueh	1616	[1]
4	Michael Addamo	1115	[1]	:	Tharmaratnam Narenthran	1474	[1]
5	Adam Hayman	1024	[1]	:	Thomas Feng	1361	[1]
6	Rad Chmiel	1339	[1]	:	Zachary Loh	934	[1]
7	Jim Cannon	914	[1]	:	Rodolfo D'Onofrio	1208	[1]
8	Kevin M Brown	1591	[.5]	:	David Cannon	893	[1]
9	Karl Zelesco	889	[.5]	:	John Ni	704	[.5]
10	James Huang	1956	[0]	:	Bobby Cheng	1842	[.5]
11	Tim Feng	1041	[0]	:	Savithri Narenthran	652	[0]
12	Eric Neymanis	913	[0]	:	Adrian Chew Lee	650	[0]
13	Greg Rowlerson	601	[0]	:	Max Chew Lee	753	[0]
14	Ollie Xue	720	[0]	:	Alex Hautot	601	[0]
15	Alexander Green	701	[0]	:	Matthew Cheah	578	[0]
16	Sam Gluzman	301	[0]	:	Peter Tsai	693	[0]
17	Steven Guo	657	[0]	:	Alanna Chew Lee	128	[0]

**MOZ** · 04-16-2010, 10:02 PM

Code:

1	Christopher Wallis	2067	[2]	:	Allen Yu	1116	[2]
2	David Cannon	893	[2]	:	Marcus Raine	1652	[2]
3	Tharmaratnam Narenthran	1474	[2]	:	Jim Cannon	914	[2]
4	Zachary Loh	934	[2]	:	Thomas Feng	1361	[1.5]
5	Bobby Cheng	1842	[1.5]	:	Adam Hayman	1024	[1.5]
6	Elsa Wei Chung Yueh	1616	[1]	:	Eric Neymanis	913	[1]
7	Max Chew Lee	753	[1]	:	Rad Chmiel	1339	[1]
8	Rodolfo D'Onofrio	1208	[1]	:	Karl Zelesco	889	[1]
9	John Ni	704	[1]	:	David A Flude	1173	[1]
10	Shane Lawson	1148	[1]	:	Ollie Xue	720	[1]
11	Peter Tsai	693	[1]	:	Michael Addamo	1115	[1]
12	Matthew Cheah	578	[1]	:	Tim Feng	1041	[1]
13	Kevin M Brown	1591	[.5]	:	Steven Guo	657	[1]
14	Alex Hautot	601	[0]	:	James Huang	1956	[0]
15	Alanna Chew Lee	128	[0]	:	Alexander Green	701	[0]
16	Savithri Narenthran	652	[0]	:	Greg Rowlerson	601	[0]
17	Adrian Chew Lee	650	[0]	:	Sam Gluzman	301	[0]

**MOZ** · 04-16-2010, 10:35 PM

Code:

1	Marcus Raine	1652	[3]	:	Christopher Wallis	2067	[3]
2	Thomas Feng	1361	[2.5]	:	Tharmaratnam Narenthran	1474	[3]
3	Elsa Wei Chung Yueh	1616	[2]	:	Bobby Cheng	1842	[2.5]
4	Tim Feng	1041	[2]	:	Rodolfo D'Onofrio	1208	[2]
5	David A Flude	1173	[2]	:	Zachary Loh	934	[2]
6	Jim Cannon	914	[2]	:	Shane Lawson	1148	[2]
7	Allen Yu	1116	[2]	:	David Cannon	893	[2]
8	Michael Addamo	1115	[2]	:	Max Chew Lee	753	[2]
9	Adam Hayman	1024	[1.5]	:	Kevin M Brown	1591	[1.5]
10	James Huang	1956	[1]	:	Peter Tsai	693	[1]
11	Rad Chmiel	1339	[1]	:	Steven Guo	657	[1]
12	Eric Neymanis	913	[1]	:	Savithri Narenthran	652	[1]
13	Karl Zelesco	889	[1]	:	Matthew Cheah	578	[1]
14	Ollie Xue	720	[1]	:	Alanna Chew Lee	128	[1]
15	Adrian Chew Lee	650	[1]	:	John Ni	704	[1]
16	Alexander Green	701	[0]	:	Greg Rowlerson	601	[0]
17	Sam Gluzman	301	[0]	:	Alex Hautot	601	[0]

**MOZ** · 05-06-2010, 12:02 PM

The finish for the Flavid Dude's knight in the 1st board game is an example of this theme Ax.

**MOZ** · 05-23-2010, 09:25 PM

22 moves is all it takes for the zed-kid to take a full point from Bob Bergmanis.

**MOZ** · 06-02-2010, 08:17 PM

Code:

1	Karl Zelesco	1001	[5]	1:0	Laurie Dalton	1307	[3.5]
2	Shane Lawson	1575	[3.5]	0:1	Adam Hayman	1408	[4]
3	Dmitry Lee	990	[3]	0:1	Olgerts Bergmanis	1516	[3.5]
4	Eric Neymanis	1043	[3]	0:1	David A Flude	1628	[3]
5	Mike Viljoen	801	[2.5]	0:1	Roger Croft	1544	[0]
6	William Chang	762	[2.5]	0:1	Steven Guo	677	[2]
7	Jimmy Ying	698	[2]	1:0	Max Han	332	[2]
8	Rafael Pecori	359	[2]	1:0	Stephen Liu	355	[2]
9	James Morrissey	370	[2]	0:1	David Chin	404	[1.5]
10	Euan Reid	374	[1.5]	1:0	Yue Yang Chen	275	[1]
11	Mike Wen	201	[0]	1:0	Calvin Shen	301	[0]
12	Daniel Yuan	937	[3]	0:0	BYE

**Calvin** · 06-03-2010, 03:28 PM

I had hoped Laurie would have got a better result, but she lost quite convincingly.

**JaK** · 06-03-2010, 04:22 PM

Originally Posted by Calvin

I had hoped Laurie would have got a better result, but she lost quite convincingly.

Check your facts and careful with your genders here Calvin!

**MOZ** · 06-05-2010, 11:26 AM

Originally Posted by JaK on chesschat

Dear Publicist, it is true that I had anticipated (albeit too late as I can see) that something wasn't exactly going smoothly in the state of Denmark.

I think JaK has become aware that the chesschat poster, Publicist, is the same as the Editor of the weekly newsletter and not me.

I hestitate to respond to JaK's nicely written piece to Publicist, lest the confusion (about Publicist identity) again surfaces.
Nevertheless, I need to answer JaK's reasonable question. "Why the preferential teratment?"

Apologies if my observation in regards to the gradual diminishing of BHCC and CJCC promotional material and subsequent decision to cease conveying related information from other sources, (the Club's website not excluded) in this forum here caused unforeseen dimensions of friction.

I understand your position (that doesn't necessarily means I justify it) although as a bearer of a multiple signature promoting events that i see fit at the time (including the Goons Show) I should be careful which sites and threads I am visiting.

What really intrigues me is that the confrontation here can be described as the proverbial storm in a tea cup in comparison to uproar it caused in the other Forum, which of what i was told since I was away during the climax of the events led to thread splitting, removal of posts and some very unsavory exchanges.

Originally Posted by JaK

Yet, promotion of the Club's events seem to be going on unperturbed if not substantially augmented in the other place! Why the preferential treatment?

I think a fairer description of the promotion of BHCC/CJCC events is that at least 6 posters consistently put material in cyberspace, without any co-ordination attempt to have a consistent nor agreed narrative. It is basically a free-for-all of individual efforts.
Flavid Dude
MOZ*
Publicist
frankablanca
JaK
trappistnight
All these concentrate on the chatboard forums.

Plus
Publicist...the Newsletter editor
SF ...the BHCC web-master

These are the current visibilities.

We seldom see input at all on the ACF newletter for our events, because it had an hiatus for quite some time. (The current ACF Newsletter Editor does an excellent job of collating from existing material anyway).

An exceptional volunteer effort keeps the BHCC/CJCC web-site up-to-date as much as content providers put forward.

So, as you can see, there are multiple outlets, multiple posters, and no co-ordination. Thus there is no favoritism. There is simply different angles to the events at our two Clubs.

The one site that remains complete with all the results is the Club web-site.

Originally Posted by JaK

I am posting here most of the time and my input in this forum is substantially larger than the corresponing participation in the other place. However, when it comes to Club promotion I am trying to be as equal as possible, not because i am trying to wave the pacifist flag (never again thanks) but for the simple reason that (A+B)>A, where A+B = all of us and A or B = not all uf us.

Nothing wrong with your position. It corresponds with Publicist and frankablanca

The way things look now, and I stand to be corrected if I am wrong, can be presented as: I don't like elements c, d, and e from set A, so I take my ball (read Club) I go to set B and stuff set A!

The only site with complete results is the Club web-site.
Bits and pieces appear all over the place at Ozchess, chesschat, the ACF Newsletter, Melbourne Chinese Newspapers, the Boroondarra Fuse newsletter, and various blogs.

I believe that discussion, not necessarily according to our liking, crirticism or encouragement, approval or rejection is better than silence. It is even much better than those horrible and monotonous stagnated repetitions of "results of round x and draw of round y in the www.clubofyourchoice/nowhere/000site".

Agreed.

I, confess that I refuse to even look at those pages anymore let alone follow their links and I know for a fact that I am not the only one who has wondered "can't they form a freeking sentence to make the bloody thing a bit more attractive and readable? But that's me anyway!

I have conscientiuesly tried to help not only BHCC & CJCC and other CLubs as much and in any way I possibly could. You know my love and devotion for the Club, you also know that despite our occasional disagreements the common cause prevails and will continue to prevail no matter what!
Good luck with the new website, looking forward to see it!

The new site release date would be nice around the Canterbury Summer Swiss time.

**MOZ** · 06-16-2010, 12:29 AM

Eq 1st on 4.5/5
D Flude, B Bergmanis

**Just2Good** · 06-16-2010, 04:45 AM

Originally Posted by MOZ

"Why the preferential treatment?"

Because the MCC and the BHCC are the two best and biggest chess clubs in Victoria!

03-31-2010, 07:08 PM	#513 (permalink)
MOZ Volunteer Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Ozchess is the marginalised cyber-spot where cc-Mods choose to engage with cc-banned posters. Posts: 3,541	Senior Allegro at Canterbury March 2010 Small turnout as there was no junior coaching session last night. Nevertheless, some really competitive games were played. At the end > Code: 1 Raine, Marcus 1652 5 2 Lawson, Shane 1148 4 3 Croft, Roger 1116 3.5 4-6 Zelesco, Karl 889 3 Chew Lee, Max 753 3 Bergmanis, O 1188 3 7 Hayman, Adam 1024 2.5 8-9 Neymanis, Eric 913 2 Lakshman, Vinay 1047 2 10-11 Chew Lee, A 650 1 Gluzman, Sam 401 1 12 Chew Lee, Ala 128 0 __________________ FReedom though Fischer-Random chess to enjoy the whole game.

04-07-2010, 08:42 PM	#514 (permalink)
MOZ Volunteer Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Ozchess is the marginalised cyber-spot where cc-Mods choose to engage with cc-banned posters. Posts: 3,541	Box Hill Chess Club. BLITZ Championship 7.45 pm Friday the 9th of APRIL 2010 9 rounds Last years cross-table. $5 for members of CJCC or BHCC. Visitors fee also applies to non-members. __________________ FReedom though Fischer-Random chess to enjoy the whole game.

06-03-2010, 04:22 PM	#522 (permalink)
JaK Senior Member Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 391	Originally Posted by Calvin I had hoped Laurie would have got a better result, but she lost quite convincingly. Check your facts and careful with your genders here Calvin!

06-05-2010, 11:26 AM	#523 (permalink)
MOZ Volunteer Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Ozchess is the marginalised cyber-spot where cc-Mods choose to engage with cc-banned posters. Posts: 3,541	JaK asks Originally Posted by JaK on chesschat Dear Publicist, it is true that I had anticipated (albeit too late as I can see) that something wasn't exactly going smoothly in the state of Denmark. I think JaK has become aware that the chesschat poster, Publicist, is the same as the Editor of the weekly newsletter and not me. I hestitate to respond to JaK's nicely written piece to Publicist, lest the confusion (about Publicist identity) again surfaces. Nevertheless, I need to answer JaK's reasonable question. "Why the preferential teratment?" Apologies if my observation in regards to the gradual diminishing of BHCC and CJCC promotional material and subsequent decision to cease conveying related information from other sources, (the Club's website not excluded) in this forum here caused unforeseen dimensions of friction. I understand your position (that doesn't necessarily means I justify it) although as a bearer of a multiple signature promoting events that i see fit at the time (including the Goons Show) I should be careful which sites and threads I am visiting. What really intrigues me is that the confrontation here can be described as the proverbial storm in a tea cup in comparison to uproar it caused in the other Forum, which of what i was told since I was away during the climax of the events led to thread splitting, removal of posts and some very unsavory exchanges. Originally Posted by JaK Yet, promotion of the Club's events seem to be going on unperturbed if not substantially augmented in the other place! Why the preferential treatment? I think a fairer description of the promotion of BHCC/CJCC events is that at least 6 posters consistently put material in cyberspace, without any co-ordination attempt to have a consistent nor agreed narrative. It is basically a free-for-all of individual efforts. Flavid Dude MOZ* Publicist frankablanca JaK trappistnight All these concentrate on the chatboard forums. Plus Publicist...the Newsletter editor SF ...the BHCC web-master These are the current visibilities. We seldom see input at all on the ACF newletter for our events, because it had an hiatus for quite some time. (The current ACF Newsletter Editor does an excellent job of collating from existing material anyway). An exceptional volunteer effort keeps the BHCC/CJCC web-site up-to-date as much as content providers put forward. So, as you can see, there are multiple outlets, multiple posters, and no co-ordination. Thus there is no favoritism. There is simply different angles to the events at our two Clubs. The one site that remains complete with all the results is the Club web-site. Originally Posted by JaK I am posting here most of the time and my input in this forum is substantially larger than the corresponing participation in the other place. However, when it comes to Club promotion I am trying to be as equal as possible, not because i am trying to wave the pacifist flag (never again thanks) but for the simple reason that (A+B)>A, where A+B = all of us and A or B = not all uf us. Nothing wrong with your position. It corresponds with Publicist and frankablanca The way things look now, and I stand to be corrected if I am wrong, can be presented as: I don't like elements c, d, and e from set A, so I take my ball (read Club) I go to set B and stuff set A! The only site with complete results is the Club web-site. Bits and pieces appear all over the place at Ozchess, chesschat, the ACF Newsletter, Melbourne Chinese Newspapers, the Boroondarra Fuse newsletter, and various blogs. I believe that discussion, not necessarily according to our liking, crirticism or encouragement, approval or rejection is better than silence. It is even much better than those horrible and monotonous stagnated repetitions of "results of round x and draw of round y in the www.clubofyourchoice/nowhere/000site". Agreed. I, confess that I refuse to even look at those pages anymore let alone follow their links and I know for a fact that I am not the only one who has wondered "can't they form a freeking sentence to make the bloody thing a bit more attractive and readable? But that's me anyway! I have conscientiuesly tried to help not only BHCC & CJCC and other CLubs as much and in any way I possibly could. You know my love and devotion for the Club, you also know that despite our occasional disagreements the common cause prevails and will continue to prevail no matter what! Good luck with the new website, looking forward to see it! The new site release date would be nice around the Canterbury Summer Swiss time. __________________ FReedom though Fischer-Random chess to enjoy the whole game.

06-16-2010, 12:29 AM	#524 (permalink)
MOZ Volunteer Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Ozchess is the marginalised cyber-spot where cc-Mods choose to engage with cc-banned posters. Posts: 3,541	Results of the June Tuesday ALLEGRO Eq 1st on 4.5/5 D Flude, B Bergmanis __________________ FReedom though Fischer-Random chess to enjoy the whole game.

06-03-2010, 03:28 PM	#521 (permalink)
Calvin Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Melbourne Posts: 268	I had hoped Laurie would have got a better result, but she lost quite convincingly.

06-16-2010, 04:45 AM	#525 (permalink)
Just2Good Tin Cup Champ 2004 Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Cairns Posts: 6,233 ICC Handle: Advantage FICS Handle: Advantage	Originally Posted by MOZ "Why the preferential treatment?" Because the MCC and the BHCC are the two best and biggest chess clubs in Victoria! __________________ . "The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing." ~ Isaiah Berlin ~

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.ozchess.com.au/chess-tournaments-australia/29-events-box-hill-chess-club.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date
Australian Chess News: Box Hill Chess Club September Allegro	Post #0	Refback	09-15-2009 10:33 AM
Australian Chess News	Post #0	Refback	09-05-2009 02:26 PM
Events at Box Hill Chess Club - OzChess - Australia's Chess Forum	This thread	Refback	02-20-2009 12:00 AM
OzChess - Australia's Chess Forum	This thread	Refback	02-19-2009 11:09 PM

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread: