![]() |
|
|
|
#46 (permalink) |
|
Tin Cup Champ 2004
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cairns
Posts: 6,056
ICC Handle: Advantage
FICS Handle: Advantage
|
Originally Posted by Firegoat7
I think the goat will do much better than expected! Remember, the goat can be a ferocious player at 3 0 on ICC!
__________________
. "You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete." ~ Buckminster Fuller ~ |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 (permalink) |
|
fireeater
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 805
|
Rujevic-Johansen is a whopper of a first round draw.
Best wishes to Bashar.
__________________
Against the assault of laughter nothing can stand I'm trying out a new blog site..... http://gorkachc.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 (permalink) |
|
Volunteer
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ozchess is the marginalised cyber-spot where cc-Mods choose to engage with cc-banned posters.
Posts: 3,495
|
Subject: Victorian Championship Reserves 2009
__________________
FReedom though Fischer-Random chess to enjoy the whole game. |
|
|
|
|
|
#50 (permalink) |
|
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 282
|
I see this
Originally Posted by MOZ
and then this
Originally Posted by MOZ by Sandman proxy and I am fuming!
I really AM! |
|
|
|
|
|
#51 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Getting owned by White in the Dragon and trying to recover lost positions from shock paralysis OTB
Posts: 1,924
ICC Handle: guest
|
Originally Posted by Arrogant-One
Haha, it appears you are wrong AO from a rating perspective. I seem to have lost 30 ACF points for entering the tournament and I have not even played a game yet.
cheers, Fg7
__________________
"...What I meant? Dear Mr Ian Rout (ACF news publisher) could you please put Ozchessforum in the next news letter! There is no reason to hide this forum from the Australian chess public. What they meant? Sorry, No english!- Amir Karibasic
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Getting owned by White in the Dragon and trying to recover lost positions from shock paralysis OTB
Posts: 1,924
ICC Handle: guest
|
__________________
"...What I meant? Dear Mr Ian Rout (ACF news publisher) could you please put Ozchessforum in the next news letter! There is no reason to hide this forum from the Australian chess public. What they meant? Sorry, No english!- Amir Karibasic
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 (permalink) |
|
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 282
|
because read the bloody thread!
Since the beginning of it, everytime I hinted of entering or not entering all I was getting was cryptics and deeply involved remarks by Trevor! There was never a clear reference of how to go about entering, the criteria of inclusion, how many places were available etc. Since the bloody CV website wasn't clear either, then one had to keep on guessing. Then I look at the final line up and I see at least two players having lower rating than mine, and they are IN and I am OUT! That's why I am fuming! Last edited by justaknight : 10-08-2009 at 02:19 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 (permalink) |
|
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 282
|
ok everything is fixed!
As soon as I stopped crying, sulking, spitting dummies etc etc, the VP of CV Mr Leonid Sandler called me to inform me that there is a place for me! ![]() Thanks, I am happy now! I will see you all on Sat at Elwood Chess Club! I leave the above protesting threads a) for posterity b) for owning up c) for Trevor to get me back! Fg7 you be quiet and play! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 (permalink) |
|
Volunteer
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ozchess is the marginalised cyber-spot where cc-Mods choose to engage with cc-banned posters.
Posts: 3,495
|
Originally Posted by justaknight
First I read of your passing interest when you said
Originally Posted by justaknight
And then when there were others showing more interest in the RESERVES I said
Originally Posted by MOZ
Then you shrunk into the wall-paper background when you posted.
Originally Posted by justaknight
But now that you have expressed your druthers I will post the pairings for the week-end. And, I will pass on your enduring thanks to the Sandman. And good luck in the tourney. May a/c have mercy on your soles.
__________________
FReedom though Fischer-Random chess to enjoy the whole game. |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 (permalink) |
|
Volunteer
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ozchess is the marginalised cyber-spot where cc-Mods choose to engage with cc-banned posters.
Posts: 3,495
|
Subject: Victorian Championship Reserves 2009
__________________
FReedom though Fischer-Random chess to enjoy the whole game. |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 (permalink) |
|
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 282
|
Trevor, let's face it, some threads, such as this one, require plain facts. Such as time, venue, entry fees etc. Witticisms no matter how sharp and/or funny just tend to complicate things!
Originally Posted by MOZ
I 've done that already, we had a very nice conversation thanks!
![]()
See you at the Club tomorrow night!
Last edited by justaknight : 10-08-2009 at 09:57 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 38
|
Some opinions on the matter of the tournaments and their organisation:
- the Vic Championships is relatively strong and it is good to see GM Johansen playing. - the Vic Reserves seems quite uneven in terms of the quality of the field. I note that the organisers have not achieved the desire expressed on the CV website of having 12 players for both tournament - that indicates to me that they did not receive enough applications to reach this goal. - It is good to see Singaporean player Wang Shee Lee playing - a quick web search indicates that Dr Lee is a research fellow at Melbourne Uni. It is good to see a new strong player join the pool of Victorian players. - It is a great result to secure naming rights sponsorship from Lexus of Blackburn. Hopefully they will get value for money for their efforts and decide to renew their sponsorship for the foreseeable future. - I am surprised that neither 2008 Champion Igor Goldenberg nor 2008 Reserves winner Pano Skiotis is playing. Both are listed as eligibile, yet seem to have decided to not exercise their right to participate. - I am surprised and disappointed that none of the various strong and young players (early twenties and younger) who have been active in playing recently are participating in the Championships. Looking at the last ratings list, I note that 7 of 13 Australia’s top 18 years or younger players come from Victoria - these include the likes of Morris, Schon, Cheng, Matheson, etc. Let’s not also forget the Stojic brothers or Sam Chow either. Of course, I understand that there may be overlap with end of semester exams, etc, but it is still very surprising that not one of these young players is participating. Of the Championship field, only Domagoj Dragicevic and Doug Lindberg are younger than 30 years, and I would think that Doug will be quite rusty. - I cannot understand why 5 of the 10 rounds (prior to the final round fixed at the National Gallery of Victoria) are allocated at Elwood, while only 3 and 2 rounds have been allocated to Box Hill/Canterbury CC and MCC respectively. With all respect, Elwood would not be my first choice for being given the greatest number of rounds (given the generally superior infrastructure at both Box Hill/Canterbury CC and MCC) or even why it would be preferred as the Saturday play venue - would not Noble Park CC be a better choice, given their strong level of participation over the past few years? - I think the inflexible allocation of rounds to a fixed total 10 days, compared to previous years where rounds could be played over about 15 days with the players having a choice of when they prefer to play, is on the whole a negative move and a disincentive that dissuades players, who may lead busy lives, from playing. - The current website is wholly inadequate for several reasons. First, there is a paucity of information relating to the Reserves - e.g. what are the prizes for the winners of the Reserves; will the winner qualify for next year’s Championships? Where is the list of Reserve participants? In fact, it is not clear that the eligibility conditions apply to both tournaments as that is not explicitly stated. Second, what are the tournament conditions - I note that the time control is noted, but what about the possibility of defaults in the event that a person cannot either attend a particular round due to illness or because they fall foul of the (ridiculous) “zero-tolerance” rule for late arrivals at the chessboard? In fact, will the tournament apply that rule or have they exercised their discretion (allowed under FIDE rules) to allow some period of grace before a default is imposed - if it is the latter, why is that not publicised? |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 (permalink) |
|
Volunteer
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ozchess is the marginalised cyber-spot where cc-Mods choose to engage with cc-banned posters.
Posts: 3,495
|
Originally Posted by The Analyst
Agreed.
It is a few years since the various structures of the tournament have meshed with the availability of the GM.
The event has had many structures. Under GW there was maximized flexibility over many venues, but a consequently long time frame made it difficult to attract the very best in the State. In 2007, an attempt was made to shorten the timescale, and to choose a format that gave opportunity to high level Country players. The changes were not well received. In 2008, the tournament reverted to the GW model (modified), and still suffered a lot of criticism on the time-committment angle. The 2009 event is a further attempt to find a balance between flexibility and certainty. I only have it second hand that the venue options did not suit Pano.
While some detail needs to be documented before the start of play, it is probably safe to say that the issues you raise in the final quote would not have influenced entries. regards MOZ*
__________________
FReedom though Fischer-Random chess to enjoy the whole game. |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 (permalink) |
|
fireeater
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 805
|
Let me try to understand things right here.
Elliott Renzies has been allowed into the Reserves tournament after the entry deadline. I am assuming Wallmuller pulled out so Elliott has evened the numbers up, so fair enough, and good luck in the tournament, Elliott. Last night a similar phone call was made by a young IM asking to play in the Championship. I know for a fact that a player in the Championship was willing to give up his place to let the young IM into the tournament, but this offer was refused. Where is the consistency in these 2 actions?
__________________
Against the assault of laughter nothing can stand I'm trying out a new blog site..... http://gorkachc.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
![]() |
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.ozchess.com.au/chess-tournaments-australia/1172-2009-victorian-championships.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| Chess Rules | This thread | Refback | 10-14-2009 10:47 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|