![]() |
|
|
|
#31 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Getting owned by White in the Dragon and trying to recover lost positions from shock paralysis OTB
Posts: 1,924
ICC Handle: guest
|
Maybe its the way your mind works, but I don't think most chess players cheat.
__________________
"...What I meant? Dear Mr Ian Rout (ACF news publisher) could you please put Ozchessforum in the next news letter! There is no reason to hide this forum from the Australian chess public. What they meant? Sorry, No english!- Amir Karibasic
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Getting owned by White in the Dragon and trying to recover lost positions from shock paralysis OTB
Posts: 1,924
ICC Handle: guest
|
Originally Posted by antichrist
Maybe they just enjoy the game you clown.
Originally Posted by antichrist
Well surely they will get better from playing so I don't see what your point is? Do you want them to not go because they don't have a realistic chance of winning many games? I detect serious psychological weakness in your mental attitude
Originally Posted by antichrist
Pride ought to be derived from doing, not from achievement. I think it is you has the problem not the person who gives it a go.
cheers,
__________________
"...What I meant? Dear Mr Ian Rout (ACF news publisher) could you please put Ozchessforum in the next news letter! There is no reason to hide this forum from the Australian chess public. What they meant? Sorry, No english!- Amir Karibasic
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) |
|
Reality Analyst
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,498
|
Originally Posted by Firegoat7
very accurate axiomatic reality analysis shown in this post .
i'm voting it for POTQ
__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom Last edited by Just2Good : 12-13-2010 at 07:19 PM Reason: Post of the Month Candidate is Firegoat7's post, NOT Axiom's |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Byron Bay, NSW
Posts: 2,548
|
Originally Posted by Firegoat7
AC
Pride from doing - one could be hopeless with the ladies in intimate moments, be the bane of their missus and their world is falling apart, yet they happily go whistling to work as if on top of world. (if I may elaborate - his wife was even reading "And the bride strips bare" in frustration and anticipation but eventually realised that there are horses for courses and you can't make a something or another out of a sour's ear) |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) |
|
Reality Analyst
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,498
|
Originally Posted by antichrist
LOL LOL
__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Getting owned by White in the Dragon and trying to recover lost positions from shock paralysis OTB
Posts: 1,924
ICC Handle: guest
|
Originally Posted by AC
Let me put it this way. The idea that you don't play chess because you are a base materialist with self esteem issues who has no faith in his own abilities to adapt seems pretty self defeating in my books.
But hey, each to their own.
__________________
"...What I meant? Dear Mr Ian Rout (ACF news publisher) could you please put Ozchessforum in the next news letter! There is no reason to hide this forum from the Australian chess public. What they meant? Sorry, No english!- Amir Karibasic
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 314
|
Still an interesting thing nonetheless. I have seen it used in online poker for the obvious money incentive. I enjoy chess just for the mental workout. I don't mind losing to someone else because that just gives me more room for improvement. Even if I did play against someone that is using an aid, I wouldn't mind because it forces me to think just that much more even though it would almost be impossible for me to win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) |
|
Immoderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wollongong NSW
Posts: 2,302
|
Pride has no dignity. However, there is dignity in heroics.
Do not put down tryers - it's a bad look.
__________________
The individual is hopeless without the group. The group is hopeless without its individuals. |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 (permalink) |
|
Tin Cup Champ 2004
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cairns
Posts: 6,056
ICC Handle: Advantage
FICS Handle: Advantage
|
Originally Posted by Iconoclast
But didn't Mr Miagi say there is no try?
__________________
. "You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete." ~ Buckminster Fuller ~ |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 (permalink) |
|
Reality Analyst
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,498
|
Originally Posted by antichrist
I mean where does one even start responding to a post like this ??
Besides the bilblical type flood of witty rejoinders that invade every sub-department of my brain , i am simply left tongue-tied and paralysed in the face of this . Collecting my thoughts ,i would like to focus on the second half of this creation , especially the part which says "they don't mind making fools of themselves in public". Actually , upon reflection ,no, i give up . This post is like a master mason's missive . A riddle within a lie within a riddle within an enigma within a lie within a riddle . Quite extraordinary . This is the only post i have ever encountered that leaves me flummoxed stumped and impotent .
__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Byron Bay, NSW
Posts: 2,548
|
Originally Posted by Axiom
Well Axiom thanks for the compliment but the answer should have been:
the lower players help pay for the rent of the premises and prizemoney though they have no chance of winning, they normally lose with a smile on their face (very nice of them) and without them I may end up on bottom of ladder myself. So I had better watch my tongue. |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Getting owned by White in the Dragon and trying to recover lost positions from shock paralysis OTB
Posts: 1,924
ICC Handle: guest
|
Originally Posted by antichrist
AC humor me for a minute here. You make it sound like such a negative experience for a weaker player to play in a tournament. I really don't understand your viewpoint at all. Personally I have always felt that tournament chess is the best environment for a player to develop. It does not matter at what level a player starts. The only important attribute is to keep striving to become a better player. Losing badly at a chess tournament has its positive side. It is how a person deals with losing that is the most important factor in their development not a past result. To be quite honest, the benefits from playing far outweigh the negatives in my mind. cheers,
__________________
"...What I meant? Dear Mr Ian Rout (ACF news publisher) could you please put Ozchessforum in the next news letter! There is no reason to hide this forum from the Australian chess public. What they meant? Sorry, No english!- Amir Karibasic
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Byron Bay, NSW
Posts: 2,548
|
Originally Posted by Firegoat7
Well you are wrong about beniftis outweighing negatives smarty pants coz in that book the psychology of chess that psychologist stated that the misery of losing is greater than the joy of winning, that the misery lasts longer. And if a player wins very little or not at all (as was my example) then there is a lot of misery. I have even heard of such players even becoming depressed over their losses, and even having mental breakdowns. So Mr Socialogist I have taught you something.
The player I was referring to had been playing for years and still had not got far off the bottom, admittingly I don't know if there are other players like this because this one just happen to be a loudmouth about how much he enjoyed the Doberl. Also there are players at the bottom who go in comps and are so (almost) hopeless and slow that they just aggravate other players - more negativity hall-wise that positivity here. Amongst juniors much more common, when they don't know how to win or lose a game (i.e. to actually move) when not a short time limit. I have backed you up in that other thread so go easy on me. See I can crawl to you as well as KB. But KB reakons he does not like crawlers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Getting owned by White in the Dragon and trying to recover lost positions from shock paralysis OTB
Posts: 1,924
ICC Handle: guest
|
Originally Posted by antichrist
Without wading into the disrespectful debate about individual intelligence. I would like to point out that psychological understandings about loss aversion are both known and accepted as being part and parcel of almost any competitive game. It is equally true that our brains constantly strive to avoid pain. This is a necessary condition the brain has developed from evolution (presuming your not a creationist). In fact I have heard that the ratio has evolved in our brain to be as high as 1:2.5 for joy/winning compared to misery/ loss.
But as I have pointed out to you before in this thread. Playing chess for hedonistic motivation is ultimately self destructive. The key point is that learning to be a better chess player requires experience. Tournament chess gives you that experience in a competitive atmosphere that helps to negate self delusion. Whether you win or lose is immaterial, so long as your motivation is directed towards getting the best out of yourself.
Originally Posted by antichrist
The misery, if it is real and being expressed, is caused by wrong attitude. It is a psychological problem in the player, not a problem with playing chess. I think to many players are simply non-objective and really haven't thought through what they expect to get from the game. These type of players have to much self worth invested in winning and losing. Chess if you are willing to persist with it will teach you so many things. Mere mortals could never understand how much self discipline is required to play the game well over a lifetime.
cheers,
__________________
"...What I meant? Dear Mr Ian Rout (ACF news publisher) could you please put Ozchessforum in the next news letter! There is no reason to hide this forum from the Australian chess public. What they meant? Sorry, No english!- Amir Karibasic
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|