Bill, KB & Dennis - All Mates - OzChess

**antichrist** · 11-22-2009, 08:56 PM

from Chesschat
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iconoclast
At Chess Chat there have been 60 banning notices in the last 60 weeks.

KB
60 weeks (420 days) takes us back to 28 Sep 2008.

Since then there have been 61 posts in the Moderation thread but Matthew has made the beginners' error of assuming all were banning notices when this is actually not the case.

In total 45 bannings have been logged in the thread in this period, however five of those loggings were just to inform members about the banning of hydras known to belong to already permanently banned users. As such these are not fresh bannings; there are actually many such bannings that are not logged at all (because some of our ex-members just can't seem to stay away).

Of the 40 real bannings (including shoutbox bans), 16 were applied to Axiom (who is now permanently banned) and 15 to antichrist. (The remainder were 4 to ursogr8, 3 to Jaydon, 1 to upldiscovered, and there was one spammer banning I logged because of its sneaky and non-obvious nature.)

A/C
Fancy I lost this battle with Axiom and I was trying so hard. BUt he got barred for silly things whereas I got barred for enjoying myself.

**Iconoclast** · 11-22-2009, 09:15 PM

Yes A/C. I did make a short hand 60 in 60. No, I did not bother to analyse it in detail. However, nor did I imply that 60 individuals were banned - just that there were 60 banning notices in 60 weeks - notices that pertain to banning.

In any case, they have banned a considerable number of of their major contributors and much of its colour.

BTW, may we change the title of this thread to more accurately reflect its content.

**MOZ** · 11-22-2009, 10:16 PM

Originally Posted by Iconoclast

Yes A/C. I did make a short hand 60 in 60. No, I did not bother to analyse it in detail. However, nor did I imply that 60 individuals were banned - just that there were 60 banning notices in 60 weeks - notices that pertain to banning.

In any case, they have banned a considerable number of of their major contributors and much of its colour.

BTW, may we change the title of this thread to more accurately reflect its content.

In the sense that a/c collaborated so that KB could make his 60 in 60 quota?

**Axiom** · 11-22-2009, 10:21 PM

Originally Posted by MOZ

In the sense that a/c collaborated so that KB could make his 60 in 60 quota?

Are you talking about collaboration with the enemy here ?

...You know how i feel about such transgressions .

**MOZ** · 11-22-2009, 11:15 PM

Originally Posted by Axiom

Are you talking about collaboration with the enemy here ?

...You know how i feel about such transgressions .

Is your emphasis on 1. or 2. below

1. To work together, especially in a joint intellectual effort.
2. To cooperate treasonably, as with an enemy occupation force in one's country.

1. does seem far-fetched.

**Just2Good** · 11-22-2009, 11:20 PM

Originally Posted by MOZ

Is your emphasis on 1. or 2. below

1. To work together, especially in a joint intellectual effort.
2. To cooperate treasonably, as with an enemy occupation force in one's country.

1. does seem far-fetched.

Please clarify what you mean MOZ. Hopefully you are not referring to that manure pile known as Chess Chat.

**Thomas Bishop** · 11-22-2009, 11:28 PM

Originally Posted by Iconoclast

In any case, they have banned a considerable number of of their major contributors and much of its colour.

This is undeniable.

It is a sad reflection on the quality of the moderation over there, and also the reason I refuse to contribute to that forum.

**Jaydon** · 11-23-2009, 05:10 PM

Originally Posted by antichrist

from Chesschat
(The remainder were 4 to ursogr8, 3 to Jaydon, 1 to upldiscovered, and there was one spammer banning I logged because of its sneaky and non-obvious nature.)

Only 3 times.. That's disappointing

**Axiom** · 11-23-2009, 05:53 PM

If we were to look at the banning activity of cc over a longer time span ,would it not be possible to ascertain even greater levels of metric insight into the big picture understanding ?

"Metrics : The measure of Men " moz .

**antichrist** · 11-23-2009, 07:17 PM

Also, a notice that a poster is being unbanned before their term is up is hardly a "banning notice". More like an unbanning notice.

----------------------------------

I am waiting for mine in the mail

**antichrist** · 11-23-2009, 07:18 PM

well guys I proved you wrong that I had gone soft - I have just as many bannings as Axiom - but I live to fight another day

**Iconoclast** · 11-23-2009, 07:42 PM

An iconoclast, the antichrist, a dog, and a cuckhold, are on a train journey from cyberspace to the Doeberl Cup. As the train crosses the border into the ACT, it goes past a field with a cow with brown hair.

The iconoclast says, "I see a brown cow in that field."
The antichrist looks at it and says, "The cows in ACT are brown."
The dog says "No, there is at least one cow in ACT that is brown."
The cuckhold says "No, there is at least one cow in ACT of which at least one side is brown."

[Yet a cow is still in the field.]

.

**MOZ** · 11-23-2009, 07:54 PM

Originally Posted by antichrist

well guys I proved you wrong that I had gone soft - I have just as many bannings as Axiom - but I live to fight another day

a/c...you have definitely lost your mojo.
You are soft as.

Helping KB meet his quota is not a sign of the challenging individual.

Just look at your namby-pamby posts recently here >>

Originally Posted by antichrist

hello all my mates, KB and JAK and Moz starter - I am off. Wasn't it fantastic that dark guy scoring 5 goals in one game - Totters Vs someone - off to chess now

Originally Posted by antichrist

JAK and I are always mates - along with Mischa and Moz

You are a ....

four letter word
starts with s
and your out of Luck.

What have you done since
>the Pope rasberry.
>>The St George revelations.
>>> The Doerberl counter-tourney?

They have got you house-trained matey. You even help out meeting quotas.

**Just2Good** · 11-24-2009, 05:35 PM

Originally Posted by Iconoclast

An iconoclast, the antichrist, a dog, and a cuckhold, are on a train journey from cyberspace to the Doeberl Cup. As the train crosses the border into the ACT, it goes past a field with a cow with brown hair.

The iconoclast says, "I see a brown cow in that field."
The antichrist looks at it and says, "The cows in ACT are brown."
The dog says "No, there is at least one cow in ACT that is brown."
The cuckhold says "No, there is at least one cow in ACT of which at least one side is brown."

I don't understand this poem.

**Rex** · 11-24-2009, 07:50 PM

Originally Posted by Iconoclast

An iconoclast, the antichrist, a dog, and a cuckhold, are on a train journey from cyberspace to the Doeberl Cup. As the train crosses the border into the ACT, it goes past a field with a cow with brown hair.
The iconoclast says, "I see a brown cow in that field."
The antichrist looks at it and says, "The cows in ACT are brown."
The dog says "No, there is at least one cow in ACT that is brown."
The cuckhold says "No, there is at least one cow in ACT of which at least one side is brown.

[Yet a cow is still in the field.]

.

So what if the cow is in the field, and maybe brown.
Does it give milk or is it dry?
Brown cow, black cow, orange cow ? They should all give milk.
Ha Ha.

11-22-2009, 08:56 PM	#1 (permalink)
antichrist Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Byron Bay, NSW Posts: 2,821	Bill, KB & Dennis - All Mates from Chesschat Quote: Originally Posted by Iconoclast At Chess Chat there have been 60 banning notices in the last 60 weeks. KB 60 weeks (420 days) takes us back to 28 Sep 2008. Since then there have been 61 posts in the Moderation thread but Matthew has made the beginners' error of assuming all were banning notices when this is actually not the case. In total 45 bannings have been logged in the thread in this period, however five of those loggings were just to inform members about the banning of hydras known to belong to already permanently banned users. As such these are not fresh bannings; there are actually many such bannings that are not logged at all (because some of our ex-members just can't seem to stay away). Of the 40 real bannings (including shoutbox bans), 16 were applied to Axiom (who is now permanently banned) and 15 to antichrist. (The remainder were 4 to ursogr8, 3 to Jaydon, 1 to upldiscovered, and there was one spammer banning I logged because of its sneaky and non-obvious nature.) A/C Fancy I lost this battle with Axiom and I was trying so hard. BUt he got barred for silly things whereas I got barred for enjoying myself.

11-22-2009, 09:15 PM	#2 (permalink)
Iconoclast Immoderator Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Wollongong NSW Posts: 2,302	Yes A/C. I did make a short hand 60 in 60. No, I did not bother to analyse it in detail. However, nor did I imply that 60 individuals were banned - just that there were 60 banning notices in 60 weeks - notices that pertain to banning. In any case, they have banned a considerable number of of their major contributors and much of its colour. BTW, may we change the title of this thread to more accurately reflect its content. __________________ The individual is hopeless without the group. The group is hopeless without its individuals.

11-22-2009, 10:16 PM	#3 (permalink)
MOZ Volunteer Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Ozchess is the marginalised cyber-spot where cc-Mods choose to engage with cc-banned posters. Posts: 3,541	Originally Posted by Iconoclast Yes A/C. I did make a short hand 60 in 60. No, I did not bother to analyse it in detail. However, nor did I imply that 60 individuals were banned - just that there were 60 banning notices in 60 weeks - notices that pertain to banning. In any case, they have banned a considerable number of of their major contributors and much of its colour. BTW, may we change the title of this thread to more accurately reflect its content. In the sense that a/c collaborated so that KB could make his 60 in 60 quota? __________________ FReedom though Fischer-Random chess to enjoy the whole game.

11-22-2009, 10:21 PM	#4 (permalink)
Axiom Reality Analyst Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Australia Posts: 3,498	Originally Posted by MOZ In the sense that a/c collaborated so that KB could make his 60 in 60 quota? Are you talking about collaboration with the enemy here ? ...You know how i feel about such transgressions . __________________ "Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom

11-22-2009, 11:15 PM	#5 (permalink)
MOZ Volunteer Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Ozchess is the marginalised cyber-spot where cc-Mods choose to engage with cc-banned posters. Posts: 3,541	Originally Posted by Axiom Are you talking about collaboration with the enemy here ? ...You know how i feel about such transgressions . Is your emphasis on 1. or 2. below 1. To work together, especially in a joint intellectual effort. 2. To cooperate treasonably, as with an enemy occupation force in one's country. 1. does seem far-fetched. __________________ FReedom though Fischer-Random chess to enjoy the whole game.

11-22-2009, 11:20 PM	#6 (permalink)
Just2Good Tin Cup Champ 2004 Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Cairns Posts: 6,233 ICC Handle: Advantage FICS Handle: Advantage	Please Clarify Originally Posted by MOZ Is your emphasis on 1. or 2. below 1. To work together, especially in a joint intellectual effort. 2. To cooperate treasonably, as with an enemy occupation force in one's country. 1. does seem far-fetched. Please clarify what you mean MOZ. Hopefully you are not referring to that manure pile known as Chess Chat. __________________ . "The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing." ~ Isaiah Berlin ~

11-22-2009, 11:28 PM	#7 (permalink)
Thomas Bishop Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Melbourne Posts: 253	Originally Posted by Iconoclast In any case, they have banned a considerable number of of their major contributors and much of its colour. This is undeniable. It is a sad reflection on the quality of the moderation over there, and also the reason I refuse to contribute to that forum.

11-23-2009, 05:10 PM	#8 (permalink)
Jaydon SCTC Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Queensland, Gold Coast Posts: 1,101 ICC Handle: Aussieboy007 FICS Handle: Bermusia	Originally Posted by antichrist from Chesschat (The remainder were 4 to ursogr8, 3 to Jaydon, 1 to upldiscovered, and there was one spammer banning I logged because of its sneaky and non-obvious nature.) Only 3 times.. That's disappointing

11-23-2009, 05:53 PM	#9 (permalink)
Axiom Reality Analyst Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Australia Posts: 3,498	If we were to look at the banning activity of cc over a longer time span ,would it not be possible to ascertain even greater levels of metric insight into the big picture understanding ? "Metrics : The measure of Men " moz . __________________ "Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom

11-23-2009, 07:17 PM	#10 (permalink)
antichrist Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Byron Bay, NSW Posts: 2,821	from CC KB Also, a notice that a poster is being unbanned before their term is up is hardly a "banning notice". More like an unbanning notice. ---------------------------------- I am waiting for mine in the mail

11-23-2009, 07:18 PM	#11 (permalink)
antichrist Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Byron Bay, NSW Posts: 2,821	we are all mates well guys I proved you wrong that I had gone soft - I have just as many bannings as Axiom - but I live to fight another day

11-23-2009, 07:42 PM	#12 (permalink)
Iconoclast Immoderator Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Wollongong NSW Posts: 2,302	An iconoclast, the antichrist, a dog, and a cuckhold, are on a train journey from cyberspace to the Doeberl Cup. As the train crosses the border into the ACT, it goes past a field with a cow with brown hair. The iconoclast says, "I see a brown cow in that field." The antichrist looks at it and says, "The cows in ACT are brown." The dog says "No, there is at least one cow in ACT that is brown." The cuckhold says "No, there is at least one cow in ACT of which at least one side is brown." [Yet a cow is still in the field.] . __________________ The individual is hopeless without the group. The group is hopeless without its individuals. Last edited by Iconoclast : 11-23-2009 at 07:44 PM Reason: word change

11-23-2009, 07:54 PM	#13 (permalink)
MOZ Volunteer Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Ozchess is the marginalised cyber-spot where cc-Mods choose to engage with cc-banned posters. Posts: 3,541	Originally Posted by antichrist well guys I proved you wrong that I had gone soft - I have just as many bannings as Axiom - but I live to fight another day a/c...you have definitely lost your mojo. You are soft as. Helping KB meet his quota is not a sign of the challenging individual. Just look at your namby-pamby posts recently here >> Originally Posted by antichrist hello all my mates, KB and JAK and Moz starter - I am off. Wasn't it fantastic that dark guy scoring 5 goals in one game - Totters Vs someone - off to chess now Originally Posted by antichrist JAK and I are always mates - along with Mischa and Moz You are a .... four letter word starts with s and your out of Luck. What have you done since >the Pope rasberry. >>The St George revelations. >>> The Doerberl counter-tourney? They have got you house-trained matey. You even help out meeting quotas. __________________ FReedom though Fischer-Random chess to enjoy the whole game.

11-24-2009, 05:35 PM	#14 (permalink)
Just2Good Tin Cup Champ 2004 Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Cairns Posts: 6,233 ICC Handle: Advantage FICS Handle: Advantage	Poem Originally Posted by Iconoclast An iconoclast, the antichrist, a dog, and a cuckhold, are on a train journey from cyberspace to the Doeberl Cup. As the train crosses the border into the ACT, it goes past a field with a cow with brown hair. The iconoclast says, "I see a brown cow in that field." The antichrist looks at it and says, "The cows in ACT are brown." The dog says "No, there is at least one cow in ACT that is brown." The cuckhold says "No, there is at least one cow in ACT of which at least one side is brown." I don't understand this poem. __________________ . "The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing." ~ Isaiah Berlin ~

11-24-2009, 07:50 PM	#15 (permalink)
Rex Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 74	How now brown cow Originally Posted by Iconoclast An iconoclast, the antichrist, a dog, and a cuckhold, are on a train journey from cyberspace to the Doeberl Cup. As the train crosses the border into the ACT, it goes past a field with a cow with brown hair. The iconoclast says, "I see a brown cow in that field." The antichrist looks at it and says, "The cows in ACT are brown." The dog says "No, there is at least one cow in ACT that is brown." The cuckhold says "No, there is at least one cow in ACT of which at least one side is brown. [Yet a cow is still in the field.] . So what if the cow is in the field, and maybe brown. Does it give milk or is it dry? Brown cow, black cow, orange cow ? They should all give milk. Ha Ha.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread: