Originally Posted by Ophiuchus
Actually you said I was "trolling" on this one. But bearing in mind the subtle distinction between trolling and being a troll, and your newly acquired love of the pedantry you claim to despise, I shall rephrase:
If you're going to accuse me of trolling for pointing out the disconnection between your views about my attitude to the AustJCL and the reality then why should I bother taking an interest in this thread at all?
I am ignoring this divisional trolling.
The "hundreds" generally are not here. They can ask that question through more credible forums or means ...
From this, I understand that if someone other than me asks, some where other than here, then you will answer. Is this true?
By a person who wrongly accuses me of trolling, who has wrongly suggested I am among those most likely to kill the body off, and who wrongly uses the thread as an excuse for more of his usual attacks on the ACF.
I am ignoring this diversion trolling
None of that sounds remotely like "good faith" to me. When I see anything that looks like "good faith" to you on this question I will let you know, but it would certainly include retraction of the rubbish I mention in the previous paragraph.
Am I correct to understand that demonstration of "good faith" by me removing my posts from this thread would be enough for you to deign to answer the question.
I can, but you have not yet caused me to be inclined to do so!
I am I right to assume that you will only answer the question when you are inclined to do so? That you would be inclined to do so if:
1. The asker was not me.
2. The question was posed elsewhere.
3. My posts on this thread where censored.
4. A particular combination of 1, 2, and 3.