Originally Posted by Iconoclast
Dear Readers,
Having read through Kevin Bonham's latest torturous feeble justifications for his own malleable standards and amoral decisions, I have given up the sport of exposing him, for a while. He is beyond redemption. His stock in trade is to misrepresent what is said and then covering those conversational misdeeds wing etymological mythologies.
Actually you've exposed nothing except your own extreme inconsistencies and pretences at inflexibility that are actually a facade for your own contradictions. You provide no evidence of misrepresentation at any point, and someone who calls taking something to play keepings-off with it "borrowing" is in no position to talk about etymological myths.
As is the case now, he bores people into giving up.
I can easily credit that failing to land a single credible point would be boring for you and I take your quitting the field as a compliment (whether you have actually given up or will come back as usual when you see how ineffective your sign-off message has been.)