Originally Posted by Iconoclast
What for? What for? WHAT FOR?
For accuracy. I realise accuracy in posting is a foreign concept to you.
Originally Posted by Iconoclast
But it was about ME. Common courtesy would suggest that you should have contacted ME.
Your past posts on UCJ, chesschat and here directed at Kevin, me and others show that common courtesy is something you dont practice.
You are well aware that you membership of the NSWCA is conditional on you meeting the conditions specified in the letter that was sent to you in December 2006.
You should have advised your president of this, instead of letting him submit an entry form for you to be a NSWCA member.
Originally Posted by Iconoclast
Has the NSWCA Pres. got some more unseemly abuse for a current NSWCA associate member?
Not abuse, just a statement of behaviour you have demonstrated over many years.
Originally Posted by Iconoclast
Yeah sure, but everybody knows the truth.
The truth is the way I described, irrespective of whatever misinformative spin you try and put on it.
Originally Posted by Iconoclast
Don't try to present your inactions as a virtue when it was really a flash of self serving common sense to avoid catastrophic disaster.
OK then, you go right ahead and reserved the right to cause yourself a catastrophic disaster.
And what catastrophic disaster would that be.
Surely you are not threatening physical violence?
Originally Posted by Iconoclast
You cannot be fair dinkum. A fun hydra Like that and others I have had, is not underhand.
Bulletin boards and chat rooms take an extremely dim view of adults pretending to be juniors as it presents many dangers.
Originally Posted by Iconoclast
It's not like, say, agreeing to not run for the NSWCA Presidency and then doing so.
I never agreed not to run.
Lyons just assumed that was the case.
Originally Posted by Iconoclast
Just going back to my vindictiveness. I can wear that label when it comes to you. You are by far the most difficult person I have ever had the misfortune to know.
And you would be one of the most abusive, foul mouthed and the user of some of the vilest language I have encountered.
Originally Posted by Iconoclast
Furthermore, I am not in anyway constrained in my enmity toward you, because you do not have wife-and-kids responsibilities - you are a loner.
Yes, you have used similar excuses for your behaviour in your abuse of Kevin.
Originally Posted by Iconoclast
I would say that the reasons for me having a family and you not at your age, is a very telling indicator as to the difference in personality between you and me. You think only of yourself, I live for others.
Dont give up your day job because as a psychologist you have no future.
Originally Posted by Iconoclast
I might swear, I might blunder in chess, I might vote weirdly, I might be on the cusp of eccentric, but one thing I do know is that I am a better person than you.
You are also deluded.