View Single Post
Old 07-16-2008, 09:46 PM   #5 (permalink)
lotlizard
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by Arrogant-One View Post
His ban is for 24 hours to allow him an opportunity to reflect on his aggressive and unfriendly attitude, and hopefully to change so as to accord with the standards of civility and courteousy that OzChess is famous for.
so do these reflect "civility and courteousy[sic]" or "aggressive and unfriendly attitude"? :

this thread about bill called "coward"

this post by phild707

this post by firegoat7

?

those were in the first four pages of sixteen
i'm sure i could find many more

just because somebody complains does not mean you have to apply a ban

especially not when the board is awash with worse stuff about the same person that was there before

and banning on such slender and arbitrary pretexts is destroying your credibility to complain about any of the bans on chesschat

if you ban bill under these circumstances phild might accuse you of having a "sad bastard" attitude

whatever that is

scary!
 

Reply With Quote