Originally Posted by Iconoclast
Therefore the evidence I give to you is hearsay with regard to you. But a direct report to me, by one of the parties about what they actually did/saqw/experianced is not hearsay. Thus their version is a fact for me - not hearsay - upon which I am entilted to form an opinion.
Matt, it is simply a gross mistake to regard the account given by one side of two opposing parties as fact. I is basically impossible for those persons (I am including persons on both sides in this) to give a objective account.
Originally Posted by Iconoclast
I cannot prove that there has never been a blue whale in the Federal Parliament Building. However, I could be excused for calling your elephant in the FPB less rightous than mine.
This rubbish is just avoidance.
Originally Posted by Iconoclast
You, Egor, cannot put your hand on the Bible and say that Gletsos was saintly.
Nor would I ever want to!:p Who's to say that Bill wasn't quietly pleased with Peter and Jason misunderstanding what he didn't say. (Only, of caurse, if he didn't say it.

)
Originally Posted by Iconoclast
The word "sure" is not as firm as the word "did." Are you saying that you "did" get versions from these controlled individuals. Or are you saying you recall that they said something, somewhere at some time.
I'm sorry that I wasn't precise enough for you. I most definity did not get anything from any "controlled individuals". You can repace "sure" with "did" for Bill and norm. The others fall into your second sentance above. I did read pretty much everything posted about it on the internet. If I needed to more at the time I did not realise it. Have you ever consindered checking with more than just two people?
Originally Posted by Iconoclast
No. I am big on doing the "right thing," being fair dinkum with others, and keeping true to yourself.
If you were really interested in doing the "right thing" you would do more than just blindly believe, and champion, one side of a situation. If you care about being "fair dinkum" you would not heap condemation a person just because it suits you to believe they deserve it.
You're to biase to see straight.
Just to set one thing straight, I am posting this to defend Bill. It's not my place, nor am I inclind towards doing so. I do not see Bill as some innocent bystander.