Originally Posted by Firegoat7
Could you please explain to me your reasoning for asking such a question before I attempt to answer it. It may help us to understand each other without needless argument.
cheers Fg7
The point: the ACF only needs to provide information on its official site (
http://www.auschess.org.au), and perhaps in its official newsletter. Some ACF officers take it upon themselves to "go beyond" this basic service delivery by providing more information on chesschat.
You see the activities of some ACF officials on that bulletin board as the whole organisation endorsing the site, while I see it as merely specific individuals acting out of their own volition to provide "value added" service.
Thus my question: would you rather no additional information was posted on chesschat at all, just to prove the point that the ACF does not endorse the site?