OzChess - Australia's Chess Forum - View Single Post

**MOZ** · 12-23-2007, 09:20 PM

Originally Posted by MOZ

That is not a very scientific answer Matt. Canterbury Juniors is (equally) happy to use the ACF rapid ratings service.
The question is....So, is the NSWJCL system better? It is certainly cheaper; for them.

I wonder if he will respond in a thread to this one of yours?

Electronic?

New data

Rapid ratings
December 2007 quarter
Number of calculations to establish new ratings.

Code:

ACT   1513
NSW   1241
QLD    162
SA      400
VIC    3305

Traditional ratings
December 2007 quarter
Number of calculations to establish new ratings.

Code:

ACT    972
NSW  4773
QLD   3972
SA     1056
TAS    624
VIC    3342
WA     846

MOZ*

12-23-2007, 09:20 PM	#43 (permalink)
MOZ Volunteer Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Ozchess is the marginalised cyber-spot where cc-Mods choose to engage with cc-banned posters. Posts: 3,541	Update on volumetric analysis of use of ACF ratings services. Originally Posted by MOZ That is not a very scientific answer Matt. Canterbury Juniors is (equally) happy to use the ACF rapid ratings service. The question is....So, is the NSWJCL system better? It is certainly cheaper; for them. I wonder if he will respond in a thread to this one of yours? Electronic? New data Rapid ratings December 2007 quarter Number of calculations to establish new ratings. Code: ACT 1513 NSW 1241 QLD 162 SA 400 VIC 3305 Traditional ratings December 2007 quarter Number of calculations to establish new ratings. Code: ACT 972 NSW 4773 QLD 3972 SA 1056 TAS 624 VIC 3342 WA 846 MOZ* __________________ FReedom though Fischer-Random chess to enjoy the whole game.