It's the content and its importance that makes me believe that the CV executive would not trust this sensitive (until its publication that is) document to anyone other than 1) a member of CV in which case there would be no need for the particular person to use his real name instead of using the sobriquet "Sobriquet"! or 2) someone who's trusted by the CV executive that would do the clerical job. I thought (without being sure as I stated in my original post) that that person might have been MOZ (i) due to the fact that MOZ is trusted (and justifiably so) by the Executive due to his position as member of the previous administration (ii) due to his actual participation in initial meetings of the present administration in order to assist the present treasurer in getting acquainted with his duties (iii) due to his style of annotating texts by using the grey shade (iv) due to his fancying himself of being some kind of a polyglote (he is not) using latin, Greek and as in this case French terms and (v) last but not least the fact that MOZ usually enjoys exhibiting an inside knowledge of situations, and why not since he was, is and hopefully will be successfully involved in future State and Club administrations.

PS1: oooops before I had time to read this posted text to see what it looked like from an aesthetic point of view... BUZZ goes the phone: "Listen carefully says my friend! In your add a her next to his said emphatically my friend on the other end of the line... "But there aren't any representatives of the fairer sex in the CV executive" I tried to say, but "shut up and do it!" my friend concluded! My friend is a reliable source, and after all, the inclusion of a harmless adjective wouldn't really hurt, or would it?

so here it goes:1) a member of CV in which case there would be no need for the particular person to use his/her real name instead of using the sobriquet "Sobriquet"!

PS2: What the heck, why do I have to get into another arguement? I stick with my initial which is "I think Sobriquet is MOZ but I am not sure!" so much for my source!