OzChess - Australia's Chess Forum - View Single Post

**MOZ** · 07-02-2010, 10:08 AM

Originally Posted by Axiom

I call for submissions detailing ideas for the proposed formation of an independent board to hear and adjudicate on matters pertaining to grievances/bannings held against the acf front forum , chesschat .

Thank you ,

Ax (<
SCT & Reality Analyst
(currently permanently banned on chesschat for trivial and vexatious reasons)

I think it only has a chance of working if all the submissions to an appeal are lodged (posted) in a dedicated thread on Ozchess.
I would anticipate that as well as well-thought-out scripted briefs, there would be interjections and explanations as the appeal proceeds.
We should disallow remote testimony from Barwon Heads maximum security prison.

This a necessary but not a sufficient condition for success btw.

07-02-2010, 10:08 AM	#5 (permalink)
MOZ Volunteer Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Ozchess is the marginalised cyber-spot where cc-Mods choose to engage with cc-banned posters. Posts: 3,541	Originally Posted by Axiom I call for submissions detailing ideas for the proposed formation of an independent board to hear and adjudicate on matters pertaining to grievances/bannings held against the acf front forum , chesschat . Thank you , Ax (< SCT & Reality Analyst (currently permanently banned on chesschat for trivial and vexatious reasons) I think it only has a chance of working if all the submissions to an appeal are lodged (posted) in a dedicated thread on Ozchess. I would anticipate that as well as well-thought-out scripted briefs, there would be interjections and explanations as the appeal proceeds. We should disallow remote testimony from Barwon Heads maximum security prison. This a necessary but not a sufficient condition for success btw. __________________ FReedom though Fischer-Random chess to enjoy the whole game.