Originally Posted by Axiom
Are you deliberately trying to be obtuse ?
There is mountains of hard core scientific visual/video proof that the videos are faked . It is just that you seemingly point blank refuse to use your google search engine .
Axiom, you don't have complete proof that they are fake. You just have the same thing you always have- guesses. If you did have 100% proof, NO ONE would believe the whole UBL thing or at least question it more. And before you say that's another media conspiracy or whatever, just remember what happened during other scandals such as Watergate and more recently, the whole WMD thing (which is actually very similar to this.) The proof clearly isn't there.
Originally Posted by Axiom
It is mind numbingly common for the brainwashed serf sheeple to be astoundingly confident in their indoctrinated govt/media position despite rarely reading a skerrick of the opposing evidence .
This is just another reason why i believe fully in the "brainwashed" hypothesis explaining this behaviour .
And it is mind numbingly common that conspiracy theorists do not understand the thought process and how academia works.
Originally Posted by Axiom
I now definitely conclude that you have serious comprehension issues . (refer : My Position....again !)
Why is it a comprehension issue if I call your position a conspiracy theory? Last I checked, you believe that the UBL thing was made up by the government (or at the very least that they are hiding some greater truth from the public)- that sounds like a conspiracy theory to me.
Originally Posted by Axiom
Why do you trust intelligence or defence agencies with their obvious political agendas and not the crime fighting agency, which focuses more on the actual facts and evidence of the crime itself ?
Where are these facts and evidence from the cia or dod ??
Well the evidence I give such as the motive and the videos, you just brush aside, so I'm not going to go down that circle again. I don't know why you trust Alex Jones and his political/financial agenda either though.
Originally Posted by Axiom
It is when they are not sound bites , but complete unambiguous full sentences and paragraphs .
I'm emphatically proving to you that there is more than enough evidence that the official story does not bear rationale scrutiny . And it would appear, in this regard , that i am in
excellent company .
Are These 9/11 Whistleblowers Credible?
Why do you not realize that I have accepted the idea that the government has not released every detail for whatever reason? That does not mean the main idea isn't still logical and holds truth. Besides, if you want to talk about company I will give you a list of academics [who believe the official story is mostly right] that your "good company" can only wish to even work under.