Originally Posted by Hayek
The thing is, I already have as I am suggesting the UBL videos and other government evidence are sufficient.
ubl videos are widely known proven fakes (unless there's 3 ubls !) and please enlighten us more on this "other govt evidence" lol
Originally Posted by Hayek
You just throw them aside and opt to jump to conclusions with sound bites or out-of-context dialog that only use logical fallacies in order to try to prove something.
oh you mean like the following i've provided :
fbi's no evidence on ubl,
NIST 's own serious doubts and the
fake videos ?? !
We still await your evidence that compels us to believe that cave directed boxcutters acted alone without the aid of insiders or allowed with foreknowledge or indeed orchestrated by other parties .
Originally Posted by Hayek
I am saying that the reason you throw aside that UBL was behind it is because you find some low level employee who thinks so or you take the words of government officials and "sound bite" them to try to prove a point. Using those methods, you can poke holes into anything, including whatever you believe in with regard to 9/11. What makes you think that you aren't wrong either?
any person with half an unbrainwashed brain can see the official story is full of holes !
What is stopping you ?
I suggest you broaden your reading on the subject instead of relying on the un,ill,dis,mis and mal - informing mainstream media for your information .