Thread: Info Wars
View Single Post
Old 05-22-2010, 05:39 PM   #389 (permalink)
Axiom
Reality Analyst
 
Axiom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,498
Default

Originally Posted by Hayek View Post
There is real evidence against your claims. You have no valid evidence- I will respond to your quotation as an example:

And how exactly does this quotation tell you that he/she is saying the conspiracy is true? All they are saying is that the White House might be covering some things up. That does NOT mean it was an inside job.

Why don't you give some actual proof instead of just speculating. Anyone can do what you are doing. And do you really think we are not trying to find Bin Laden?


And you are now using Mcveigh as a credible source? Would most similar criminals not say the same to make themselves look better?

A detective also considers everything and while you may have one or two small inconsistencies that fall in line with your grand conspiracy, that does not mean the whole thing is true. When told so many times, any story is bound to have inconsistencies. It is the one that has the least and seems most logical (and has hard scientific evidence- which in this case is there) that is usually the accepted one.
Not only does that site allow anyone to be considered a scholar as it says in the "about" section, but even if there are a couple of educated people on there, that does not mean they are right. Do you really want to play that game? Do you really want me to start naming professors, experts, etc. that DO believe in the official story or atleast something close to it? There is no doubt my numbers will outweigh yours- even you have to admit that.

I followed the first link and was done because it is just more of the same sort of quotation you posted above. Nowhere does the ex-Reagan cabinet member say anything about it being an inside job. Furthermore, if you are going to argue this on ethos alone, then I clearly have the edge as stated in my previous argument. If you want to point out one particular person that you feel is great "proof" of your little story, then go ahead and post it and I will respond. Until now I have not seen anything credible whatsoever. Using your logic, one can make the argument that almost anything in this world is real- and if people believed it, it would tear apart the fabric of all scientific and societal progress over the last 6000 years. Thank God most people think more logically than you do.
you talk about evidence , without addressing the fbi's (lack of) evidence on ubl !
why do you keep referring to "your conspiracy theory" ?
did you read my position on 9/11 above ??

and could you for the sake of clarity in this debate ,do likewise and summarise your position .
__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom

Last edited by Axiom : 05-22-2010 at 11:40 PM
Axiom is offline  

Users Flag!
Reply With Quote