Axiom, calling me ignorant, childish, naive, or whatever does not help your argument or your ethos. As for being specific- I'll start with the 9/11 inside job conspiracy by Mr. Jones. I told you why the "evidence" he gives is not really proof in my post in your "do you remember" thread that you conveniently chose not to respond to, instead redircting me here:
The problem with a lot of the conspiracy theories that are popular today is that they do not contain any institutional analysis, they do not implement any form of the scientific method, and they simply do not have valid evidence to be accepted in the academic world. Do you really think that all the scientists and researchers out there would reject your theories just because they feel like it? Most researchers take evidence very seriously and as such, your theories would be accepted if you had valid proof- which you don't.
Now you can question the requirements of the academic world, but if you have any strong evidence, you would be able to pass their requirements any way.
What of your theory is there for me to debunk when you don't even have any hard evidence in the first place? The burden of proof is with you, not me.
On the MSM: who said I believe everything they say? Every organization and group has an agenda, I realize that. I never said I believe everything the MSM says or that I just go to the MSM for all info, so stop putting words in my mouth or assuming things.
As for the quotation on anarchism- what is your point? Who said I said anarchism is evil? We are talking about conspiracy theories here, not anarchism and even if Jones is an anarchist I don't care because it is not relevant.