Originally Posted by Hayek
Being "newsworthy" is a matter of opinion. I do not think all of those things are newsworthy because I think some of them are hoaxes (including some of the 6 I know of.)
ok , which ones do you think are hoaxes ?
Originally Posted by Hayek
What's your point with the 7 years thing? There are people that have been studying the news media their entire lives who would disagree with you. I am not saying that makes them necessarily right, but that the 7 years is just irrelevant.
my point is , you appear to have studied little of the infowars info . read my "do you remember thread"
eg.Remember when alex warned of military on american streets ? Well now the army is training to tackle tea partiers !
Also i have for over 4yrs presented 1000s of posts on these matters both here and the other forum.I'm just inviting you to do some backstory reading.
Originally Posted by Hayek
From 9-11 to the New World Order conspiracies, they are littered with false assumptions and fake reporting. Just Google Alex Jones' name and you are bound to find a lot of evidence. Even in his public relations, etc. it becomes clear that he is a liar and a fraud. I will find some links for you later if you want some.
ive seen the sites criticising alex jones , and the worst they can come up with is he is not anti zionist enough !
Have you read about the media apologising to alex jones after falsely accusing him in the mmalkin shouting match . There are a litany of lies about a jones to demonise him , like saying the jewish museum shooter was an alex jones fan ,when he was the opposite !
Alex Jones has never lost a court case .
Where are the defamation cases , if what he says is false ??
Again be specific about these so called false assumptions and fake reporting .
Originally Posted by Hayek
You will probably be surprised to know that I am a Ron Paul supporter and Campaign for Liberty guy. He believes in the idea of blowback and his whole foreign policy approach is based on anti-war values. Read his books, he clearly does not believe Jones' b.s. Taking it back further, look at the idealogy and the people he surrounded himself with- Rothbard, etc. and you will see that they have no room for such nonsense.
i fully agree with ron pauls foreign policy approach .
ron paul appears on the alex jones regularly as a guest - what does that tell you ??
Originally Posted by Hayek
I really don't know where Alex Jones' supporters got this idea that Paul believes his b.s.- I am guessing just because Jones said he supports Paul that you all followed blindly as you do in the videos. As a Paul supporter and someone who loves this country, I really wish Jones had picked another candidate to support- the conspiracy theorists only hurt the cause.
ron paul appears on the alex jones regularly as a guest - what does that tell you ??
Originally Posted by Hayek
If you truly did provide adequate evidence, your views would be accepted by many more. You can deny it as long as you want and live in this bubble you have created yourself, but saying you are right over and over again doesn't make you right. (and if you genuinely think you have proved it, I suggest you look at the scientific method and how scientific papers must be presented in order to be accepted as truth.
my views are being accepted by more and more people everyday , as the uninforming msm collapses .
i suggest you look at the scientific papers presented by prof. s .jones.
Originally Posted by Hayek
What exactly do you mean? What books have I read and pertaining to what topic?
pertaining to these competing states as opposed to the NAFTA/NAU agenda
Read "Tragedy & Hope" C.Quigley .
What do the CFR &TRI LAT COMM do ?
Originally Posted by Hayek
Weak argument, I can say the same about you.
except im saying it because , you appear completely uninformed about the globalisation agenda (which is everywhere , check out the number of tertiary academic courses in globalisation ) , the words of kissinger ( who uses the term"global governance") , the aims of Club of Rome ( from their own papers) , z brzinski ( the grand chessboard) .
the rise of the EU and other geo-trade/govt blocks .
see my "new world order" thread.
and guess where i heard about this :
ECB: Global governance today , yep , the most informing source on the planet - ALEX JONES !
Originally Posted by Hayek
The New World Order has been brought up time and time again over the last few decades by conspiracy theorists, trying to prove themselves right. They take words that politicians say and twist them to show that what they said was right before (without any proof) is in fact right. That is your way of showing something is true, when in reality that sort of "proof" would be laughed at in the scientific community or in a court of law. What Bush, etc. said of the New World Order was often completely different than what conspiracy theorists have said and in reality, no such world-wide conspiracy even exists.
so what was kissinger talking about when he used the term "global governance" ?
and what did bushes,blair,brown etc mean by "new world order"
what did g brown mean by "the need for a world constitution for the global financial systems" ?
Originally Posted by Hayek
You really think China, India, Brazil, etc. are collaborating with the US and Europe to become one?
you bet ! they love globalisation !
China is the U.N's model state !
but its a step by step process , the history of the EU gives you a good idea how this forms . Currently we are in the phase of larger free range serf farming management blocks being set up , and USA being destroyed by design , so as to help usher in further steps towards this global governance .
WATCH