Originally Posted by Egor
Do you know what these, "finanially advantadous actions", are supposed to be?
The NSWCA sponsored the Sydney International Open (NSW) with $500. Only a fool would think that the NSWCA would not dop the same for the Australian Championships to be held in NSW.
Can you promise that NSWCA WILL NOT do the same/similar for the both these events.
The simple answer is that the NSWCA is not behind the bid, so your main issue does not exsist.
This is wrong is that powerful NSWCA councilors are running the bid (and the event). The Parramatta bid reads "... the composition of the tournament committee if any Shane Burgess, Tarun Pant and Bill Gletsos (to comply with relevant ACF by-laws)." Thus the NSWCA is up to its neck in the event.
Again you have wrong information, I'm completely willing to condemn questionable ethics. However, in this case there are no questionable ethics, just what appears to be a complete figment of your imagination.
Ethics? Ethics? Do you know what you are talking about. It is patently clear from his comments on the CV bid that Bill Gletsos has been privy to it. He then is found to be on the organising committee of the Parramatta bid. THAT, sir, is a CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
Bill Gletsos must resign completely from at least one of the bodies, ACF or NSWCA. You know this to be true. If you had an ounce of moral strength you would agree. However, you are a victim of the Gletsos method and now kowtow to him. Be a man and stand up to him.