Originally Posted by Z&MLoh
Moz,
I tested your theory above and you are right ... of course.
Using March 09 data as the basis for comparison,
Code:
1600-1899 group
Players Players in Mar-09 Players not in Mar-09
Mar-09 49
Sep-09 59 23 36
Mar-10 43 20 23
Code:
1300-1599 group
Players Players in Mar-09 Players not in Mar-09
Mar-09 43
Sep-09 77 25 52
Mar-10 68 20 48
Mike
No need to run up the flag of
I was simply reflecting on the effect on statistics of the entry of micro-juniors such as 1st on the leader board here >
Chess Chat - Australia's Premier Chess Forum - View Single Post - ACF March 2010 Ratings
But I could equally have been thinking of the second-place-getter.
You know change is in the air when Bob Bergamanis says of KZ...he knew deeper of the theory against the Marshall gambit than I did; Or when Mr Podvorac says "how can I see into his eyes to judge what he is thinking when his head doesn't show over the table-ledge."
Mike they are not the only 'hunters of the hunted'. I can name 3 from the nascent Sunday coaching group who are about to give us a new 'phantasmagoria'.
regards
MOZ*