Strawmen, Ad Homs And Hyperbole
Originally Posted by Iconoclast
phhht. That tosser is describing anyone who sits opposed to his view on XYZ as being a "sceptic." He goes on to ridicule all opposition as if each and every one of them was an idiot clone of some original idiot sceptic from Doltland. That is illogical, and you know it.
Rather than a piece of "reality analysis" it is a diatribe of mostly -but not all - rhetoric of the nonsense variety.
He needs to do some REAL learning in science so that he can make INFORMED comment on matters scientific. Currently he presents the characteristics of an ignorant arrogant loon who's education came in the post from Dodgy College P/L.
If you could be more specific with your objections to any of mike adams' above work then i would be most happy to respond .
[BTW i agree at least in sentiment with all of mike adams' above piece except for the 'god stuff' .]
__________________
"Sometimes the obligation of the intelligent is to restate the obvious. None more important than emphatically stating that there is a : ' Naked Emperor Elephant in the Room' " Axiom
Last edited by Axiom : 01-28-2010 at 01:05 AM
|