Originally Posted by MOZ
[LISTxx][*]Rapid performances.[/list]The opportunity to publish a few top 'whatevers' for rapid ratings does not seem to have been part of the A.C.E. strategy. This is rather a surprise as we know that juniors in particular often get a rapid rating first and naturally would appreciate the visibility in a national magazine. This feature may lead to more juniors subscribing for the magazine. (No criticism by me here; just an observation that may assist the publisher).
MOZ*
It doesn't seem to be the strategy of anyone so far, there are no top rapid lists on the ACF page that I can see. I think we've discussed this in another thread, that the ACF might want to consider a more organised plan for a national rapid rating system but to do so the states would have to take steps toward phasing out their own junior ratings systems.
Still, it all seems rather ironic for MOZ to take such an interest in rapid ratings.
