Originally Posted by Firegoat7
Good point Phil. Now lets examine your complaint. I will presume you are acting in good faith, for the sake of analysis.
Fact 1. SOMEBODY posted under your name on a different board.
FACT 2. We don't know yet who that somebody is.
Fact 3. This example is almost the same as Phil707's complaint on Chesschat.
Fact 4. There has already been moral outrage directed towards Ozchess about this incident on Chesschat.
cheers Fg7
Regarding Fact 3
"This example is almost the same as Phil707's complaint on Chesschat"
I would point to one significant difference:
PhilB's statement has been posted here close to verbatim.
While we may not admire the surrepticious manner in which this was done but we must agree that it is hardly any gross travesty of the truth.
PhilD's complaint was quite different in that respect.
Phil(D)
__________________
"It ain't no sin if you crack a few laws now and then, just so long as you don't break any."
Mae West
|