OzChess - Australia's Chess Forum - View Single Post

**MOZ** · 05-15-2009, 05:19 PM

Originally Posted by Arrogant-One

Based on the rating difference, I'd expect Wallis to hammer him.

Well, AO, technically, actually, and philosophically, he is unrated.
The locally allocated rating was a best guess by the Arbiter. <Our local practice to end guesses with a 1401>.

I thought the hint about un-rated in the original post may have been an alert.

05-15-2009, 05:19 PM	#56 (permalink)
MOZ Volunteer Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Ozchess is the marginalised cyber-spot where cc-Mods choose to engage with cc-banned posters. Posts: 3,540	Originally Posted by Arrogant-One Based on the rating difference, I'd expect Wallis to hammer him. Well, AO, technically, actually, and philosophically, he is unrated. The locally allocated rating was a best guess by the Arbiter. <Our local practice to end guesses with a 1401>. I thought the hint about un-rated in the original post may have been an alert. __________________ FReedom though Fischer-Random chess to enjoy the whole game.