Originally Posted by justaknight
Hi AO, as I explained to David, that was not a matter of offence. The omisiion created confusion and missunderstanding!
I also, did not know the original source until i was informed by a third party that this was the case. At the same time I received an email, by MCC's President Grant Szuveges, CCed to Amiel, that this should not become an issue and should be settled immediately, or words to that extent.
Now, that's nonsensical finger pointing with no reference to specific examples. I, honestly don't know what you are talking about in this case so no response, thanks!
None spoke of stealing! I referred to Calvin's (I do not know who Calvin is by the way) brevity as the plausible reason for the omission underlining "was" as part of that sentense!
Indeed he is doing a great job and I always read his blog! It's a must for me!
Good move!
Cheers!
Elliott
hi Elliott
There are 237 posts in this
chesschat thread. Starting at about post #7 there is fair evidence that material is being lifted from Alex's site, massaged/paraphrased/twisted and even on a few occasions refuted.
I can't recall a single instance in that long thread where it has been sourced to ozchess.com.au
Luv your interviews btw.
regards
the reader of the Parables.
Rembrandt, Return of the Prodigal Son, 1662, (Hermitage Museum, St Petersburg)