Originally Posted by Firegoat7
What is wrong with having a newsletter editer that questions the ACF agenda's?
Where is the ACF agenda stated publically? Where does this 'agenda' reside, except in the heads of a few elite chess officials?
cheers Fg7
I agree with Matt on most counts regarding the ACF. But this is an ACF newsletter so obviously they don't want to be criticised by their own editor! I would expect the editor to collate information that is provided by clubs and other bodies in an unbiased manner. I don't have a problem with an editorial, in fact I think an editorial is a great idea. Just so long as it doesn't start out with the basic premise of being critical of the ACF. I believe that someone who volunteers to edit the ACF's newsletter should have the ACF's interests in mind. There are other more appropriate avenues for giving them a serve.